It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: ScepticScot
That some of the other kids have 2 daddies or mummies and that there is nothing wrong with that.
It isn't about sex, its about relationships.
That isn't sexuality...
I guess I don't want younger kids to be in the position to have it explained to them what is heterosexual and homosexual. As I said there is a time for that, so it is a delicate situation. Just the fact there might be 2 daddies or 2 mummies means that it is OK... No need to go past "its OK" for a good number of years...
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ScepticScot
Away with you now, some of the reading books they come home with address the issues of same-sex marriage and the like.
They are still more interested in what the bunny rabbits doing at the beach as opposed to who he is pumping all the same or cuddles up to at bed time.
originally posted by: andy06shake
Well, funnily enough, i still thought an erection was for pissing over high walls until around that age.
Weans just don't see the world in a sexual context until puberty kick in, imho.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ScepticScot
Kids don't have a problem with that.
Kids, however, don't get married, at least not in this country.
Then again at 16, i dont know many people who are not still children to be honest.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
That is exactly what is being taught , really they are not going into sexual details with primary school kids.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: ScepticScot
That is exactly what is being taught , really they are not going into sexual details with primary school kids.
How are they doing it... I also do not want non-heterosexual relationship to be seen as special or not normal. Personally I don'tr see a need for it as young kids don't typically care one way or the other and if they grow up with different relationships around them then they see it all as normal.
To do lets say they have a show and tell of the LBGT community is something I don't think is right are young ages.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
That is all it really is doing. Showing gay relationships as ok rather than just the traditional family unit we see in most school books.
It also covers accepting different religions and disabilities but no one seems to get their knickers in a twist over that.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
As Muslims gain more power in western culture this clash will happen, if two left sides are fighting among themselves, maybe the right should pick the winner on this one.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Same here.
And like all normal people I support freedom of sexuality.
But this is the site (ats) where people openly defend little kids being dressed in drag and dancing in gay clubs for adults simply because “white Christians are bigots”
Now here we have non-‘white Christians’ protesting sexualisation of little kids and the left is silent.
Hang on a second that's a little different, the parents of the kid dancing in the nightclubs are obviously a little messed up but should have the right to do that if they choose to, however schools teaching sexuality is not on, that's the parents job.
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Same here.
And like all normal people I support freedom of sexuality.
But this is the site (ats) where people openly defend little kids being dressed in drag and dancing in gay clubs for adults simply because “white Christians are bigots”
Now here we have non-‘white Christians’ protesting sexualisation of little kids and the left is silent.
Hang on a second that's a little different, the parents of the kid dancing in the nightclubs are obviously a little messed up but should have the right to do that if they choose to, however schools teaching sexuality is not on, that's the parents job.
Uh, no. CPS takes children for far less.
Secondly, Imagine if this was gay conversion therapy. I'm sure you'd say parents should have the right to that if they choose to, as well?
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Same here.
And like all normal people I support freedom of sexuality.
But this is the site (ats) where people openly defend little kids being dressed in drag and dancing in gay clubs for adults simply because “white Christians are bigots”
Now here we have non-‘white Christians’ protesting sexualisation of little kids and the left is silent.
Hang on a second that's a little different, the parents of the kid dancing in the nightclubs are obviously a little messed up but should have the right to do that if they choose to, however schools teaching sexuality is not on, that's the parents job.
Uh, no. CPS takes children for far less.
Secondly, Imagine if this was gay conversion therapy. I'm sure you'd say parents should have the right to that if they choose to, as well?
Really, like really?
You are all about rights not being infringed until you have something you disagree with, if the child is not being harmed then the parents can raise their child how they see fit, I realize that's a foreign concept to you authoritarian types.
And WTF is gay conversion therapy , get off the special sauce dude it's rotting your brain.
And if ONE christian was to be protesting the homosexual inclusiveness of this school
ALL leftists would be screeeeeeching “intolerance”