For Defaming Conservatives - Congressman Devin Nunes Sues Twitter for 250 Million Dollars.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
And if they do it certainly won't be Devy Tardo's lame attempt.

I was going to continue our discussion, but your repeated lame, pathetic and childish references to Mr Nunes just make it clear what a waste of my time that would be.

If you would get out of your mammie's basement once in a while, maybe even - god forbid - get a job - maybe you'd gain a modicum of civility.

I think you're taking this harder than Nunes, which is saying something. Simmer down their sport.

Curious statement you made about Augustus though, kind of a weird place to leap and be wrong just because you don't like that twatter has Nunes memes.

For Defaming Conservatives - Congressman Devin Nunes Sues Twitter for 250 Million Dollars.

I don't think lil Devin thought this up on his own. Sounds more like a directive from the "twitter in Chief" to me.

originally posted by: Lethalsport
Devin Nunes is an Honorable American who fights for the truth. Nunes is one of the bravest Patriots we have. No one has been held accountable. It's time to turn the tables. Go D Nunes. You are a God send.

huh?....Nunes wore a fanny pack with a quart of K-Y in it, so he would be prepared whenever he went to the white house

boo hoo, people says terrible things about me on twitter...waaaaaahhhhhh!!!!...friggin grow a pair, isn't that what all you rightwingers say to "triggered" liberals....republican snowflakes on ATS can't even follow their own advice.......

PLUS...this is so ridiculous, it took me a while to stop laughing....the suit will be thrown out with eyerolls from the judge

People need to grow up. LMAO @ suing twitter and every media outlet you don't personally agree with. Conservatives are really at the end of their rope and it's obvious. They are just trying to destroy companies owned by liberals. It's completely pathetic. If only they held Faux news to the same standard.

a reply to: Dfairlite

He is going to have to prove that posts were removed for political reasons.
You cant sue someone for stating their opinion because opinions cannot be proven false and to sue any statements that are believed to be slanderous need to also be false. If derogatory information is true its not slander.
Who is claiming that their posts were removed when they were within terms?

a reply to: Dfairlite

Then he will really need to prove intent.

a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

The entire complaint is a resume of Nunes time in congress. A glowing report that even links yes links to his biography.
How can he claim this is about him as a private citizen when its all about how they ruined his reputation in congress and made him lose an election. ( Never mind the whole Russia thing though).

a reply to: Dfairlite

You should be glad.
These are laws that allow trump to lie about his opponents without being sued for it.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

I was going to continue our discussion, but your repeated lame, pathetic and childish references to Mr Nunes just make it clear what a waste of my time that would be.

If you would get out of your mammie's basement once in a while, maybe even - god forbid - get a job - maybe you'd gain a modicum of civility.

Awwww, triggered? You and Devy Lame Ass can sue me.


Actual translation: You don't have a legal leg to stand on.

originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
His "Cow" has more followers than he does. The self-own is complete.

I'd rather follow a piece of roadkill than a dope like him so I get their rationale.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
Nice to see everyone around here celebrating the weaponization/abuse of our court systems because they got butt hurt.

We all lose if this goes through.

The two parties are really going full REEEEE right now.

Like I said earlier, plenty of little AOC's running around wanting more government intervention when they start to feel rectal discomfort from other people's mouth noises.

Whats funny is how much attention Devin Nunes gave to his parody accounts. The Devin Nunes Cow account that he brings up so much in his filing, had been heard of by almost nobody before this. At the time of the court filing it only had about 1,200 followers. Now it is approaching 500,000 followers.

a reply to: carewemust

What a pussy! He can't handle a little legitimate internet criticism. I thought liberals were supposed to be the sensitive ones?

originally posted by: carewemust
Monday, March 18, 2019

The lawsuits against liberal outlets that go against core USA values, is accelerating.

Oh, so Freedom of Speech and reporting the news are things that go against core USA values now? When exactly did they become un-American? When they started hirting Trump's poor little feelings? When they started reporting on his criminal activity?
This r3ally shouldnt have to be said, save for the fact that you are an amazingly dumb and disingenuous clown: just because a newspaper reports stuff that you dont like, doesnt mean that it is somehow "un-American."
(Also, i hate to burst another hole in ypur incredibly stupid bubble, but your buddy isnt sitting in the White House today without a legion of [Russian] Twitter bots. You sure you want to crack down on Twitter? )

I'd also like to point put how mind-bogglingly idiotic, hypocritical, and pathetic it is for the same people who constantly whine about government intervention and socialism, now want the government to step in and regulate freaking Twitter and media organizations because they dont like what they say and it hurts their poor little feelings.
Why, it's almost like you guys were the sensitive little "snowflakes" all along!
Truly and aincerely pathetic. I would be embarrassed with myself if i were you. What a pathetic joke you are.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: CosmicAwakening
Ha thats probably an hours salary for the ceo... Move along serfs.

The suit is probably more for "teaching a lesson". I'm not sure who will get the money though. It's not Nunes.

Nobody will get it, you dolt, because it will never even make it to court, because it is an entirely specious lawsuit that has already turned him into a nationwide laughingstock. Well, among people who are smarter than the pathetic little MAGA corner of ATS idiotically cheering him on, at least (which is a very low bar).

www.foxbusiness.com...

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey is admitting mistakes were made while banning conservative voices, but that disclosure is being met with resistance from some skeptics.

Dorsey, along with Twitter’s chief legal officer Vijaya Gadde, addressed the claims of censoring conservatives on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast. Dorsey admitted the social media platform may have acted too quickly.

“We would fully admit that we were probably way too aggressive when we first saw this as well and made mistakes,” he said on Tuesday.


They freely admit the problems.
To pretend it is not an issue is ludicrous.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Since when is that a violation of the law however?

Overzealous mods are now grounds for multi-million dollar lawsuits?

Look out ATS! I've had a number of posts of mine deleted where the responsible mod later admitted they made a mistake. Do you just want to give me ownership of the company now so we don't have to involve any lawyers?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Dfairlite

Then he will really need to prove intent.

He could prove that it was removed purely because of political views and it would still be legal. Twitter is a private entity..

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: shooterbrody

Since when is that a violation of the law however?

Overzealous mods are now grounds for multi-million dollar lawsuits?

Look out ATS! I've had a number of posts of mine deleted where the responsible mod later admitted they made a mistake. Do you just want to give me ownership of the company now so we don't have to involve any lawyers?

There have been other cases in which states went after websites for violations of their states consumer fraud laws, New Jersey and Connecticut specifically. I sited them previously in this thread. I do not agree with them, but that does not mean they have not occurred.
As twitter has admitted publicly some of their "mistakes" I would wager they will settle quickly and quietly.