It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source: www.foxnews.com...
California GOP Rep. Devin Nunes filed a major lawsuit seeking $250 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages against Twitter and a handful of its users on Monday, accusing the social media site of "shadow-banning conservatives" including himself to influence the 2018 elections, systematically censoring opposing viewpoints and totally "ignoring" lawful complaints of repeated abusive behavior.
In a complaint filed in Virginia state court on Monday, obtained by Fox News, Nunes claimed Twitter wanted to derail his work on the House Intelligence Committee, which he chaired until 2019, as he looked into alleged and apparent surveillance abuses by the government.
Nunes said Twitter was guilty of "knowingly hosting and monetizing content that is clearly abusive, hateful and defamatory – providing both a voice and financial incentive to the defamers – thereby facilitating defamation on its platform."
originally posted by: Metallicus
Good.
Free speech needs to be protected from these effective monopolies.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Metallicus
Good.
Free speech needs to be protected from these effective monopolies.
My personal view is that Twitter, Facebook, ATS, are PRIVATELY OWNED. As such, they can do whatever they want. If enough people don't like it, they should go build their own platform. It's horrible being a slave to any person or media platform.
originally posted by: CosmicAwakening
Ha thats probably an hours salary for the ceo... Move along serfs.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Metallicus
Good.
Free speech needs to be protected from these effective monopolies.
My personal view is that Twitter, Facebook, ATS, are PRIVATELY OWNED. As such, they can do whatever they want. If enough people don't like it, they should go build their own platform. It's horrible being a slave to any person or media platform.
They lose that right when they are a monopoly and they actively block competitors from forming.
Traditionally, libel was a tort governed by state law. State courts generally follow the common law of libel, which allows recovery of damages without proof of actual harm. Under the traditional rules of libel, injury is presumed from the fact of publication. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment's protection of freedom of expression limits a State's ability to award damages in actions for libel.
originally posted by: neo96
Traditionally, libel was a tort governed by state law. State courts generally follow the common law of libel, which allows recovery of damages without proof of actual harm. Under the traditional rules of libel, injury is presumed from the fact of publication. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment's protection of freedom of expression limits a State's ability to award damages in actions for libel.
www.law.cornell.edu...
And yet Twitter was openly denying peoples free speech.
Nunes has a case, and he's more than likely to win it.