It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ok, but your government has already had to launch in inquiry into those courts for their treatment of women. They may not have teeth yet, but how long before they might?
originally posted by: Ohanka
I don't care if pedophiles were "anxious" because Tommy was there. This reporting law is seldom enforced. May as well jail every journalist out there. Anyone who goes out of their way to protect pedophiles beyond the required legal representation deserves the same contempt the pedophiles themselves receive.
The real reason for this charge is they don't like Tommy or what he has to say, even though he has every right to speak.
What a pathetic and sad state state this country is in.
out of their way to protect pedophiles beyond the required legal representation
When you began rejecting Churchill And Thatcher.
Yet you've let Sharia Courts supersede your jurisdiction in certain areas it would seem.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Wardaddy454
I wonder if the people of Glasgow felt that way?
I know my great grandmother had some rather colourful things to say about the Man in question.
I remember that cow taxing our school milk!
Dirty wrong'yin!
In rather a few parts of the UK, bar Tory London town, Westminster, and Terresa Mays non existant strong and stable hills, Thatcher is/was about as welcome as Colon Cancer.
Do the poor miners, steelworkers, trade unions, and teachers lives just not matter nether the way they most definitely did not matter to Thatcher or her ilk?
Or are you simply ignoring what she done to those poor people the same way you also dodge other relevant facts that have been presented to you about Tommy?
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Wardaddy454
When you began rejecting Churchill And Thatcher.
Churchill was a GREAT war time leader and a hopeless peacetime leader.
But still a great man who will have the eternal respect of the British people.
Thatcher was an evil woman who divided this country to an extent not seen since The Civil War.
The current crop of politicians and their amazingly incompetent handling of Brexit have at least matched her.
In some ways we are still paying the price for some of Thatcher's policies.
Many disagree with me.
Yet you've let Sharia Courts supersede your jurisdiction in certain areas it would seem.
No, UK Law always takes precedence.
Did you know there have been Jewish courts in the UK since around Cromwell's times?
The Islamic courts have more or less the same powers as the Jewish Beth Din Councils.
Neither can pass a sentence that would be iilegal under UK Law.
There you are again with the "people like you" comments. LoL The story is rather plain Tommy 10 names is a racist arse, coke head Muslim hater.
Well, you should. After all he is a twat responsible for the inception of the English Defence League. Do you support them or their ilk?
Other peoples homework as you have been clearly told already, and badly reported i may add.
I don't even know what you're going on about now. LoL I suggest you appeal for some common sense.
It's not over till the fat lady sings, the Iron Witch is dead and Terresa Mays a skinny cow soon to be politically dead just like her party, let's just see how the future plays out.
You really don't understand History at all? Silly little sausage that you are. What's the bet there are a few parties in the streets when Theresa May pops her clogs? x
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Wardaddy454
I'm not interested any longer its clear your a silly Tommy 10 names supporting sausage.
What i comprehend thus far is that your nothing but a gullible fool who refuses to see further than the Muslim hating nose on your puss.
Oh aye, and you think the likes of Margaret Thatcher was the bee's knees which says it all really.
Night, night little pepper, have fun. x
Did she divide it, or were you already divided.
I guess maybe half of you always wanted socialism.
And for now UK law takes precedence.
How would you ever know when it doesn't when you have a state news agency?
Or what about when you're the minority in the coming decades?
And for now UK law takes precedence. How would you ever know when it doesn't when you have a state news agency?
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Wardaddy454
And for now UK law takes precedence. How would you ever know when it doesn't when you have a state news agency?
I think we might actually notice that.
Yes, of course in the UK we have to rely solely on the BBC for all our news. If only we were allowed access to other sources of news or the internet. Oh, wait a minute......
What utter nonsense.