-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

208 Democratic presidential nominees in the race as of right now.

Two Hundred and Eight...

List

a reply to: crankyoldman

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Is that a real cover?

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Yep appears it is from their page on pinterest.


pin.it...

The Great Awakening is more then Q, Q is just one part of it. Q is a tool, which you can use to any degree you wish, but it is by far not the only part of this process going on.

I figured I'd drop this in here as it is a nice, general overview of things and helps shed light on the larger aspects. Not meant to derail, or drift, really just meant to add to the complexity of this effort, as today and in the next few days many may feel something greater within.

Ohhh maybe a shout out to Warrior??




twitter.com...

Good to see reports in the news.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Theres that pesky number 17 again. I swear, these days just about any official number released in the news or by the government has the number 17 in it. Synchronicity at its finest.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Ironic that they're all trying to look from the Light into the Dark!

Another "Resignation"... 😲

Warner Bros. Chairman Steps Down Following Quid Pro Quo Sex Scandal

Warner Bros. chairman and CEO Kevin Tsujihara announced Monday he would be stepping down from his post two weeks after an explosive Hollywood Reporter article that alleged he promised acting roles in exchange for sex.

The article includes text messages between British actress Charlotte Kirk and Tsujihara going back to 2013 when they were introduced by Australian billionaire James Packer at the Hotel Bel Air past midnight. Packer and his business partner Brett Ratner were close to closing a production deal with the studio at the time.

The messages suggest a quid pro quo sexual relationship between the aspiring actress and the studio head in which he made promises that he'd introduce her to influential executives and she'd be considered for roles in movies and television. They also show she was determined to hold Tsujihara, Packer and Ratner accountable.

a reply to: crankyoldman

I guess their first debate will be held on a football field.

Rel?
"The Cell"

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

EMN, I went on a blind date to Banbury once... I feel a bit the same digging into this!

From the UK government official website...

Huawei Cyber Security Review 2013 - has PDF download on report.

The National Security Adviser has today published the executive summary of a report to the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) on a review of Huawei’s Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC).

The report is in response to the ISC’s recommendation in their July 2013 report on Foreign Investment in Critical National Infrastructure.

...So... UK government is worried about UK critical infrastructure and so gets a Chinese firm to do a security check on its own equipment? WTF?

From the PDF came this in the exec summary:

The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) reported in June 2013 on Foreign Investment in Critical National Infrastructure. The report questioned in particular the ability of the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC)to operate with sufficient independence from Huawei headquarters. The report recommended that the staff in HCSEC should be GCHQ employees; or that, as an absolute minimum, oversight arrangementsshouldbe strengthened, and the Government should be more directly involved in the selection of HCSEC staff.

...So then we have a Chinese company managing GCHQ employees (FVEY) to look for cyber threats on infrastructure? No... they decided it had to be Huawei employees but GCHQ would have veto on the managers:

The review’s first conclusion, however, was that GCHQ’s involvement in the future appointment of senior staff to HCSEC should be strengthened. At present, GCHQ have a power of veto over appointments through the security vetting process. The review recommends that, in future, GCHQ should lead and direct senior HCSEC appointments(in consultation with Huawei), in particular through chairing the selection panel.

Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC) Oversight Board: 1st annual report 2015 - government report on the centre for 2014/15:

The HCSEC facility in Banbury, Oxfordshire, belongs to Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd. The Oversight Board has now completed its first full year of work and has covered a number of areas of HCSEC’s work over the course of the year 2014 to 2015.

The Oversight Board concludes that in the year 2014 to 2015 HCSEC fulfilled its obligations to provide assurance that any risks to UK national security from Huawei’s involvement in the UK’s critical networks have been sufficiently mitigated.

HCSEC opened in November 2010 and its infrastructure meets the UK Government’s standards as a secure facility..... It is a crucial part of a set of arrangements agreed earlier that year between the company and HM Government about mitigating any perceived risks to UK national security arising from the involvement of Huawei in parts of the UK’s critical national infrastructure. HCSEC provides security evaluation for a range of products and services used in the UK market. Through HCSEC, the UK Government is provided with insight into Huawei UK’s strategies and product ranges. GCHQ, as the national technical authority for information assurance and the lead Government operational agency on cyber security, leads for the Government in dealing with HCSEC and with Huawei more generally.

So... this was set up in 2010 under Tony Blair as Prime minister and the only reports available go through to 2015 under David Cameron as prime minister.

Note that Banbury started as a small market town where the nursery rhyme Ride a cock horse to Banbury Cross came from.

The site in Banbury is with a few hundred yards of the M40 motorway running between London and Birmingham.
It's about 20 miles from Oxford/Oxford University!

Banbury has grown to become a bustling commercial centre:

Banbury's main industries are car components, electrical goods, plastics, food processing, and printing.

One last thought:
If Huawei steals America's technology/patents for the Chinese government and...
UK's GCHQ uses Huawei HCSEC to find out more about Huaweis new technologies...
Is the UK also stealing America's IPR... X to Y, Y to Z?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
That's a whole lot of WTF there.

Too busy today to post much, but I see Trump is keeping the heat on General Motors over their plans to close the Lordstown (Ohio) plant. Now, I'm in the auto industry, and I understand why the plant is closing, but I appreciate Trump trying to goad GM into repurposing the plant. I don't recall Obama ever giving a crap about workers losing their jobs.

a reply to: butcherguy
a reply to: EndTheMadnessNow

Roger that! Thanks to EMN for highlighting it!!

I assume "The Cell" reference is both pointing out Huawei and UK gov in collusion and...
pointing to Huawei being leaders in the killer 5G technology.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

You are exactly right,

For many years now the information that guided the population came from a select few channels on radio and television. The powers that be set themselves into positions to own a majority of these information channels for their benefit.

With the internet, they are struggling to maintain their control. The public's eyes are now being taken off of their televisions and are focusing more on their computers and mobile phones. On the internet there are too many different channels to own, and they are mostly owned by The People now. For whatever reason, these powers that be didn't anticipate what the internet would become, which looks like it may turn out to be a fatal mistake.

The powers that be are now trying to reestablish their dominance on the internet, which is why you see them modifying search results to guide you back to their channels, their videos, and censoring channels that threaten their control of public opinion. They are going so far to create conflicts that will convince the public that they need to censor their own channels for their best interest, as if it was their own idea to do so, but it is neither for their best interest nor their own idea.

Social media, online discussion forums, memes and viral subjects now dominate the public's short attention spans with information. The powers want to control those sources, or at the very least the information passing through those sources. That is because whoever owns these new sources, and the information from them, is the one that is in control. Again, it seems The People are in control right now, and control is not exactly the best word for it. Celebrities on television and radio still have influence even when moving to the internet domain, but new "influencers" are rising every day. When The People's information is currently viral and dominating the The People's attention, that is when it is their time to shine...

Q is a channel. A channel that somehow made a following and got on stage into the public's limelight. Now it seems its just a matter of reflecting some of that light into the shadowy corners, and possibly behind the curtains. You are the news now, right?

What they thought was the cover of darkness was really just twilight. Just illuminate it all.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

We've all heard the phrase a picture can speak a thousand words but this is a serious WoW factor.

Yes, you assumed correct on "The Cell". I'll post more when I get back later.

On your last thought... what vicious circular insanity.

You mentioned car components, do you know if a "GKN Driveline" HQ or subsidiary exists somewhere nearby?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Further digging on EMN's pointer to UK's Huawei run HCSEC cyber security cell. I have read the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC) Oversight Board: 1st annual report 2015 further and identified that Ciaran Martin is GCHQ Director General Cyber Security and regarding HCSEC:

The Board is chaired by Ciaran Martin, DG for Cyber Security at GCHQ. It comprises senior executives from Huawei, including in the role of Deputy Chair, as well as senior representatives from across Government and the UK telecommunications sector.

Prior to joining GCHQ in February 2014, Ciaran was Constitution Director at the Cabinet Office. In this role, he was the lead official negotiator for the Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Scotland in the run-up to the Edinburgh Agreement in 2012 on a referendum on independence for Scotland.

Previous Cabinet Office roles included Director of Security and Intelligence, from 2008 to 2011, and Head of the Cabinet Secretary’s Office from 2005 to 2008. Before that Ciaran spent 6 years at HM Treasury and 3 at the National Audit Office, after graduating from Hertford College, Oxford in 1996.

Here is his picture:


I'm wondering if he links in to:
a) The London meetings with Strzok, Page et al that we have so many pictures in Q posts?
b) If he is the guy in the picture in Asia that many thought was Prince William? The one near the kindergarten and bank.

H had some airtime in Dec 2018 blaming Russia for hacking.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Theres that pesky number 17 again.

In the Bourne movie, the Tron graphics with the credits at the end, there's a door key that opens a lock....guess which number is on it?

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

EMN,

Airbus' Helicopter division Eurocopter Group is 15 miles from Banbury, in Kidlington, on the way to Oxford.

GKN Driveline HQ is in Redditch, Worcestershire. That's about 25 miles from Banbury and both are close to the M40 motorway. The Redditch HQ is about the same distance from GCHQ in Cheltenham. The 3 places form a pretty regular triangle!


There used to be GKN Fasteners in Banbury town centre but doesn't appear to be there anymore (GKN subcompanies are merged and name changed more than any group I know).

Crompton Technology Group is based in Banbury and makes "Innovative aerospace composites for civil and military applications".

This Autonews article covers how both GKN and a Banbury company called Prodrive (Wiki) are concentrating on electric cars!

From Prodrive wiki:

It develops new technologies and systems for clients which include Jaguar Land Rover, McLaren Automotive, Bentley, Rolls Royce (commercial jet engines), Volvo and the Land Rover BAR America's Cup team. The company has a carbon composites manufacturing facility in Milton Keynes making lightweight components for premium vehicle manufacturers, including Jaguar, Aston Martin and Bentley, and the aerospace industry.