Beyond Bigelow & BAASS, After AATIP and on To the Stars...

a reply to: ctj83

ctj83 Please check your PM inbox, you have a message.

a reply to: Defragmentor

Nah, they wanted "program status be upgraded" to reduce its visibility to people who might ask questions about what the program budget was used for imho.

In the end it produced nothing but "reams of paperwork".

a reply to: Springer

Thanks Springer

originally posted by: Jukiodone
a reply to: Baablacksheep

He is still posting in this YT comments thread and covers his core theory.
www.youtube.com...

This is his summary comment:

The key idea is G/c^4 is the strength of the coupling of the mass energy-stress density tensor Tuv to the gravitational field Guv in Einstein's field equation of 1915. G is Newton's gravity constant. c is the actual speed of light at the field point where Einstein's local partial differential tensor equations apply. The speed of light is determined by the electrical and magnetic properties of the medium as shown by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860s around the time of the American Civil War. The square of the speed of light is inversely proportional to the product of the electrical response of the material to incident electromagnetic fields "permittivity" with the corresponding magnetic response "permeability". In the case of quantum vacuum this response is primarily from virtual electron-positron pairs inside the vacuum according to Feynman-Schwinger '"Quantum Electro-Dynamics". In materials real electric charges in motion contribute as well, but usually their corrections are small. Their corrections are embodied in the "index of refraction" which is normally still not very different from 1. However, when we pump properly designed artificial layered (lattices within lattices) meta-materials with special frequencies and wavelengths of both non-radiating "Tesla" near EM fields (including "scalar" polarization) as well as radiating EM "far fields" of only two transverse polarizations, I predict that we will get enormous "Frohlich coherent" resonances pushing the effective speed of light down close to zero where light stands still in the meta-material. This makes the space-time in the material very soft easy to mould like soft clay with tiny amounts of electromagnetic energy - that can be negative making antigravity. By continuity of Einstein's equation that will spread out to the surrounding space outside the fuselage but not very far - these are called evanescent fields because we are only using the "Tesla" near fields made from coherent Glauber states of virtual gravitons including all five spin 2 tensor polarizations.

Interesting that it seems to re-use a few core principles we've heard before.

Yep. He busy. Right in the thick of it all.

a reply to: mirageman

If this is all to make the military and IC look good then it's the strangest way of going about it.

You'll hear no argument from me with regards to the strangeness of it all.

But if there is something more to this mystery than secret military technology and this is made public, the custodians of this new truth will certainly be in the spotlight as the wider world races to catch up.

Where better to be than at the center of things, spinning the news as they break? Focus in this, don't mention that, underline such and such etcetera.

And if it was only military and intelligence shenanigans from the start, but people can be made to believe there is something more to it, then that will work just as well.

In fact, an imagined bogeyman is even better than a real one, because a real one is unpredictable whereas a bogeyman who do not exist will never really catch you off guard.

And let us not forget that these are the guys who came up with "duck and cover" as a public relations effort to keep the public nice and snug in the face of thermonuclear annihilation.

It doesn't always need to make sense to us.

Two days ago I've had an experience with "the others". I have only one memory, like being somewhere and trying to move an object with my mind. I did see other people possibly doing the same thing. After midnight I felt like I was briefly sitting in my bed and something put me back to sleep. I've heard one long word spoken in some strange language. After that I fell asleep but woke up again and the room was empty. I would describe the experience as positive.

a reply to: beetee

Very well put. I fully agree with everything you have stated here.

a reply to: Willtell

Sacred Lore.

Whatever TTSA turns out to NEVER lose your hope, your innate innocence and positive outlook…it’s a good and refreshing thing. TTSA is but a grain of sand on a colossal beach and many of the other grains are the real thing…we just have to be patient and it will come.

Seek and ye shall find is a hard but true reality

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Willtell

Sacred Lore.

Whatever TTSA turns out to NEVER lose your hope, your innate innocence and positive outlook…it’s a good and refreshing thing. TTSA is but a grain of sand on a colossal beach and many of the other grains are the real thing…we just have to be patient and it will come.

Seek and ye shall find is a hard but true reality

Yeah well said, SL brings balance to the force

I think according to "the others" there is no balance in duality. I'm pretty sure their message is more like "All is one". Tom Delonge said these things are possibly not spiritual at all, but there are some books with comparative studies. And the majority of experiencers describe them as spiritual.

a reply to: Willtell

Thanks for the encouragement!
Rest assured I will continue to pester you guys with news from TTSA
Except for the updated T-shirt designs maybe (I get informed about these on a weekly basis from TTSA).

a reply to: SacredLore

TTSA may or may not have the answers and evidence people seek. I wish them well but either way I can’t see it is a great move to pre announce and hype an announcement. Then delay. Then release an opinion piece etc.

a reply to: ctj83

Absolutely, the communications from TTSA were/are messy. I think even Elizondo agrees with that.
I remain curious to see where we will be at by December.

a reply to: SacredLore

Perhaps we might get contact from Vallee’s Artificial Intelligence aliens, as mentioned in Forbidden Science 4, if there is any “out there” behind this!

originally posted by: SacredLore

Thanks for the encouragement!
Rest assured I will continue to pester you guys with news from TTSA

Except for the updated T-shirt designs maybe (I get informed about these on a weekly basis from TTSA).

I concur with the sentiment that you are pretty durn cool, Sacred.

If I'm not being too nosy are you an "experiencer" by any chance? If so, you could score more than updates and a t-shirt...Kit Green will give you a free brain scan!

originally posted by: pigsy2400

In the latest interview with Pasulka that GUT posted, she didn't seem to think it was a joke. She even said that these people involved (Tim Taylor et al) believed that any contact with the "others" would be techno based and would not be a carbon based "life-form".

"These people" (as she often calls them) certainly pushed their innate eccentricity with her - for example, their tacky insistence on blindfolds; and odd, childish assumptions that she'd recognise an 'X Files' filming location. I think I started punching myself repeatedly in the face as soon as the dreaded R-word ("Roswell") inserted itself into the narrative.

Overall, despite her engaging personality and interesting religious perspective, it seems to boil down to another case of "someone told me blah about UFOs", no matter how in awe of "these people" she may be, and what a "cool trip" it was.

I was tempted to read her book until the R-word emerged, but then 'R' already IS a thriving religion for many wishful souls - which is the thrust of her book.

a reply to: SacredLore

Well a different kind of conversation would be nice as he hinted at last December.

As long as he isn't a John Dee / magician kinda guy! The only differences being that you swap out the mysticism for ufos and it's practically the same, if they weren't already

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

Least it was not R for Rendlesham CB.

a reply to: Baablacksheep

Ones the old testament, the other the new testament or Genesis / Revelations if we wanna go all biblical.

Regardless they will be used to prop up whatever it is they want people to believe.

originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: SacredLore

Well a different kind of conversation would be nice as he hinted at last December.

As long as he isn't a John Dee / magician kinda guy! The only differences being that you swap out the mysticism for ufos and it's practically the same, if they weren't already

I agree, but maybe it's a good thing. You don't get the possibility to transform your entire worldview from something, which can be explained quite simply as a very advanced level of technology.