Beyond Bigelow & BAASS, After AATIP and on To the Stars...

a reply to: pigsy2400

Adding to all that for speculation's sake... something like laser-guided plasma-spheres would fit into the category of UAVs with a certain "skunkwork footprint", right?

a reply to: mirageman

God damn it Jim, I'm a doctor not a phenomenon related space time metric ufo retrieval crash team engineer!

They are still going for the USO aspect then...

Whats interesting here is the the continuation of what has come before. Are these guys Bigelows Stars team 2.0!

They are recreating ATP/NIDS/BASS/AAWSAP/AATIP step by step as they go...I wonder which billionaire they are targeting this time.

a reply to: pigsy2400

Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur and MIT technologist Rizwan Virk and the Toronto-based CEO of the quantum computing company, ReactiveQ, Deep Prasad have both signed on to help with securing investment for the project.

Will those two be the next Firmages?

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: coursecatalog

I think my favourite part was

The company’s white paper is pretty wild. It asks, “Do fleets of UAP 'migrate' from Catalina Island to Guadalupe Island with a certain frequency?

And if so, how well do whale songs correlate, if at all, to UAP appearances?” It’s unclear how whale songs are relevant here, but let’s move along.

I saw a documentary called "The Voyage Home". An alien communicated with whales in it. They also had an invisible spaceship.

Looks like there is a connection between whale songs and Tic Tacs

a reply to: celltypespecific

If you convert whale and dolphin sounds into different RF signals then they are no longer whale and dolphin sounds.

Not only that there is not necessarily a correlation with what the camera picked up any more than if seagull defecated on his head just before. And what did they calibrate against terrestrial objects?

In other news Colm Kelleher. The cleverest Irishman that Bob Bigelow knows seems to have been erased from the TTSA Website?

He's no longer part of the TTSA Team

a reply to: mirageman

Doesn't he still work with Bigelow Aerospace? Maybe he doesn't have the time, or there's a conflict of interest

originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: pigsy2400

Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur and MIT technologist Rizwan Virk and the Toronto-based CEO of the quantum computing company, ReactiveQ, Deep Prasad have both signed on to help with securing investment for the project.

Will those two be the next Firmages?

Prasad has very much bought into the TTSA thing. It's pretty wild to see.

TTSA Announces CRADA with U.S. Army CCDC


Development Command to advance TTSA’s materiel and technology innovations in order to develop enhanced capabilities for Army ground vehicles.


dpo.tothestarsacademy.com...-team

TTSA’s technology solutions, which leverage developments in material science, space-time metric engineering, quantum physics, beamed energy propulsion, and active camouflage, have the potential to enhance survivability and effectiveness of multiple Army systems. TTSA will share its discoveries with Ground Vehicle System Center (GVSC) and Ground Vehicle Survivability and Protection (GVSP) and the U.S. Army shall provide laboratories, expertise, support, and resources to help characterize the technologies and its applications.

“Our partnership with TTSA serves as an exciting, non-traditional source for novel materials and transformational technologies to enhance our military ground system capabilities,” said Dr. Joseph Cannon of U.S. Army Futures Command. “At the Army's Ground Vehicle Systems Center, we look forward to this partnership and the potential technical innovations forthcoming.”

Steve Justice, TTSA’s COO and Aerospace Division Director added that, “This cooperative research agreement brings additional, critically important expertise that is necessary to advance the state-of-the-art in both our near and long-term technology areas of study. While the Army has specific military performance interests in the research, much of the work is expected to have dual-use application in support of TTSA’s path to commercialization and public benefit mission.”

What does all of this mean?

I can't make head nor tail of what any of the above means. TTSA is going into the tire business?

Celty what does it mean, you're the scientist?

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: celltypespecific

If you convert whale and dolphin sounds into different RF signals then they are no longer whale and dolphin sounds.

Not only that there is not necessarily a correlation with what the camera picked up any more than if seagull defecated on his head just before. And what did they calibrate against terrestrial objects?

Great point. I have no idea. I am skeptical of this particular venture, Kevin Day gives me pause.

originally posted by: Willtell
TTSA Announces CRADA with U.S. Army CCDC


Development Command to advance TTSA’s materiel and technology innovations in order to develop enhanced capabilities for Army ground vehicles.


dpo.tothestarsacademy.com...-team

The above is simply marketing babble.

Only thing that should matter is the potential "Independent" evaluation by the Army of the "Meta-Materials" in possession of TTSA.


TTSA’s technology solutions, which leverage developments in material science, space-time metric engineering, quantum physics, beamed energy propulsion, and active camouflage, have the potential to enhance survivability and effectiveness of multiple Army systems. TTSA will share its discoveries with Ground Vehicle System Center (GVSC) and Ground Vehicle Survivability and Protection (GVSP) and the U.S. Army shall provide laboratories, expertise, support, and resources to help characterize the technologies and its applications.

“Our partnership with TTSA serves as an exciting, non-traditional source for novel materials and transformational technologies to enhance our military ground system capabilities,” said Dr. Joseph Cannon of U.S. Army Futures Command. “At the Army's Ground Vehicle Systems Center, we look forward to this partnership and the potential technical innovations forthcoming.”

Steve Justice, TTSA’s COO and Aerospace Division Director added that, “This cooperative research agreement brings additional, critically important expertise that is necessary to advance the state-of-the-art in both our near and long-term technology areas of study. While the Army has specific military performance interests in the research, much of the work is expected to have dual-use application in support of TTSA’s path to commercialization and public benefit mission.”

What does all of this mean?

I can't make head nor tail of what any of the above means. TTSA is going into the tire business?

Celty what does it mean, you're the scientist?

a reply to: celltypespecific



Who is this prasad? What kind of camera even costs 50k? military grade tech?

And most importantly, Where is the photo of the tic tac




Btw blackvault updated his TTSA timeline page

The below timeline is a culmination of about two years worth of work since AATIP was unveiled. Every point you read below is generated directly from the words, lectures, news broadcasts and written material of the KEY players involved with this whole saga since day 1. Navigating this “AATIP Timeline” forces you to immerse yourself in a twisted maze of conflicting dates, contradicting sources, questionable intentions and a slew of unanswered questions.

The Timeline – Last Updated 10/23/2019

originally posted by: vlawde
a reply to: mirageman

Doesn't he still work with Bigelow Aerospace? Maybe he doesn't have the time, or there's a conflict of interest

Seems to be the case. According to his Linkedin Colm is still a VP at Bigelow Aerospace.

What's more interesting is that Linkedin does confirm he worked at BAASS on the AAWSAP contract ( we know BAASS was awarded this contract in that time period).



Some of his responsibilities appear to be the very things TTSA are claiming to have done, or will be doing in the near future....

• Briefed government department undersecretary and senior United States senators on threat analysis and advanced technology programs.
• Worked closely with IC to develop and execute multiple programs involving advanced aerospace technology including negotiating and executing multi-disciplinary subcontracts for database creation, physics and engineering analysis and medical science studies
• Led in the creation of all scientific programs and strategic initiatives for the company.
• Interfaced with Congressional staff, political consultants, Washington DC think tanks and other organizations in the furtherance of company goals.
• COMSEC Custodian and Facility Security Officer for IC latter contract period.

As we know Colm was also originally part of the TTSA background team. So what happened to subcontracts for database creation, the physics and engineering analysis? Which senators did he brief? What did he tell them?

Isn't this what Zondo says he's been doing for the TV cameras in the last year or so?

a reply to: IMSAM

Prasad....(Deepneuron) is an active TTSA supporter often on twitter and reddit. Most likely on this forum. He is a CEO of a quantum computer company and outside affiliate of TTSA (Lue specifically).

I am skeptical of this new UAP hunting venture due to Kevin Day. Kevin Day is a great person but I have my concerns (sorry Kevin).


Below is an example of the $50,000 camera and the supposedly TIC-TAC caught on video:






twitter.com...

originally posted by: 1ofthe9

originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: pigsy2400

Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur and MIT technologist Rizwan Virk and the Toronto-based CEO of the quantum computing company, ReactiveQ, Deep Prasad have both signed on to help with securing investment for the project.

Will those two be the next Firmages?

Prasad has very much bought into the TTSA thing. It's pretty wild to see.

Hi 1ofthe9.... I am happy that I am not the only one to notice this.... "wild" is an understatement.
He is an excellent case study ...
None the less he seems like a nice kid.

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: coursecatalog

I think my favourite part was

The company’s white paper is pretty wild. It asks, “Do fleets of UAP 'migrate' from Catalina Island to Guadalupe Island with a certain frequency?

And if so, how well do whale songs correlate, if at all, to UAP appearances?” It’s unclear how whale songs are relevant here, but let’s move along.

I saw a documentary called "The Voyage Home". An alien communicated with whales in it. They also had an invisible spaceship.

The ET's have moved on to Whale Mutilation.....

Mystery surrounds humpback whale found dead in depths of Brazil’s Amazon jungle

www.independent.co.uk...

Here is something very relevant to our endeavor, though not directly related to TTSA.

Edward Snowden searched the CIA's networks for proof that aliens exist. Here's what he found[/b

PSA for all the Area 51 stormers, chemtrail believers and climate change deniers: Edward Snowden has searched the depths of the US intelligence networks and can report the conspiracy theories are not true. As a former employee of the CIA and contractor for the National Security Agency, Snowden had access to some of the nation's most closely held secrets. And, like any curious mind with access to the CIA's version of Google might do, he went in search of answers to some of society's most pressing questions. As it turns out, the US government is not aware of any intelligent, extraterrestrial life, he says. "For the record, as far as I could tell, aliens have never contacted Earth, or at least they haven't contacted US intelligence," Snowden writes in his recent memoir, "Permanent Record."

Its very interesting to analyze how TTSA has influenced the media's acceptance of UAPs/UFOs....the CRADA story broke last week...mainly picked up by fringe media (except popularmechanics). This week the story is gaining traction by more mainstream media include NBC and Fox. Their masterful ability to control, manipulate, and publicize the UFO narrative is what separates TTSA from other Ufology groups. Its important to understand how this was accomplished....

So their strategic approach is actually pretty transparent now when I think about it..

They have several work groups that focuses on communicating their message to the :

1. Media>>>>>>> (Tucker at FOX, MJ Banis at Vice, Leslie kean NYT, Bryan Bender Politico etc.....)

2. DC >>>>>( Reid, Podesta, Mellon, congressman Walker, and several other undisclosed politicians )

3. Military>>>>> ( CRADA with Army, Policy changes with Navy, TDL's Military Genrals)

Blink-182 founder's UFO hunting group clinches deal with Army to study 'exotic material

www.foxnews.com...

Yes....but Snowden apparently was not aware of AATIP ( and the four other undisclosed UFO programs mentioned by Corbell)
Snowden did not have the access he thought he had.

RE: Snowden/UFO mania

There are countless private networks that are completely disconnected from the outside world, as in: you can't access the compute farm unless you have a physical/direct connection on an isolated desktop in some random server closet.

Snowden should know that.

SIPRnet/JWICS is great for controlling cross-program communication but anything specific pertaining to the TS/SCI wheelhouse is most definitely not hard-linked to the net. In order to access certain dept databases, you need to physically be on the campus, more than likely within a SCIF, and using some sort of directly connected KVM/Console interface. Even then, ALL your activity is logged, monitored and strictly controlled. You don't go anywhere on a secure and isolated LAN without a monitor watching everything you're doing.

It goes without saying that I think Gary McKinnon was baited - he wasted his bandwidth on exactly what the USG wanted him to while they sniffed out his entire home network.