It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
During a whirlwind campaign swing Saturday through New Hampshire, Clark, the newest Democratic presidential candidate, gave supporters one of the first glimpses into his views on technology.
"We need a vision of how we're going to move humanity ahead, and then we need to harness science to do it," Clark told a group of about 50 people in New Castle attending a house party -- a tradition in New Hampshire presidential politics that enables well-connected voters to get an up-close look at candidates.
Then the 58-year-old Arkansas native, who retired from the military three years ago, dropped something of a bombshell on the gathering.
"I still believe in e=mc2, but I can't believe that in all of human history, we'll never ever be able to go beyond the speed of light to reach where we want to go," said Clark. "I happen to believe that mankind can do it. I've argued with physicists about it, I've argued with best friends about it. I just have to believe it. It's my only faith-based initiative." Clark's comment prompted laughter and applause from the gathering.
When I put this question out across the United States to a number of different people, I sent it to a couple of people who were inside NIDS (National Institute of Discovery Science, now-defunct). Some of those people have bumped up against the UFO subject in their former work for the government and a number of them have been notoriously known as the 'aviary.'
Back in 2003 when I gave Gen. Clark's initial statement about the fact that we could go faster than the speed of light to one of the people inside NIDS, he said: 'A bird told me that Clark has been given access to crashed saucer material.'
originally posted by: coursecatalog
On another note, but related to the theme of intelligence agency meddling that runs through this thread, here are two recent posts by an account purported to be owned by former CIA scientist and oddball conspiracy amplifier Ron Pandolfi on his frenemy Dan Smith's forum:
Footman is Ron himself. The Cheese is a bad pun nickname for Joe Firmage (fromage). The Princess is Ron's wife who allegedly controls inter-dimensional portals according to Dan Smith. The president may refer to Trump who Ron predicted pretty early in the 2016 campaign would win the election in an upset. This information supposedly came from a combination of predictive algorithms and human inteligence gathered through remote viewing.
This is where things get cyptic. He refers to Joe Firmage and his "rattling cage" which is his antigravity gyroscope device that certain enthusiastic TTSA supporters on this thread have brought up recently. He seems to say Firmage has been demoing this device in Hollywood and may have found a new source of funding (Bread?). He then makes a reference to (I assume) former NATO Supreme Allied Commander General Wesley Clark being the four star general actually driving this effort.
Clark's name has come up many times in the past as someone who may be "in the know" about UFOs and government possession of advanced technologies. For a while he was head of a company investigating alternative propulsion technologies. This is what he said at a private party back in 2003 while running for president:
During a whirlwind campaign swing Saturday through New Hampshire, Clark, the newest Democratic presidential candidate, gave supporters one of the first glimpses into his views on technology.
"We need a vision of how we're going to move humanity ahead, and then we need to harness science to do it," Clark told a group of about 50 people in New Castle attending a house party -- a tradition in New Hampshire presidential politics that enables well-connected voters to get an up-close look at candidates.
Then the 58-year-old Arkansas native, who retired from the military three years ago, dropped something of a bombshell on the gathering.
"I still believe in e=mc2, but I can't believe that in all of human history, we'll never ever be able to go beyond the speed of light to reach where we want to go," said Clark. "I happen to believe that mankind can do it. I've argued with physicists about it, I've argued with best friends about it. I just have to believe it. It's my only faith-based initiative." Clark's comment prompted laughter and applause from the gathering.
Here is a snippet of a Grant Cameron interview where he asks his sources in NIDS about whether Clark had ever been briefed on UFOs:
When I put this question out across the United States to a number of different people, I sent it to a couple of people who were inside NIDS (National Institute of Discovery Science, now-defunct). Some of those people have bumped up against the UFO subject in their former work for the government and a number of them have been notoriously known as the 'aviary.'
Back in 2003 when I gave Gen. Clark's initial statement about the fact that we could go faster than the speed of light to one of the people inside NIDS, he said: 'A bird told me that Clark has been given access to crashed saucer material.'
Source: www.whipnet.com...
Its interesting that Clark has come up yet again. There have been rumors that Pandolfi is involved in a parallel disclosure effort that neatly mirrors TTSA with Firmage and his magic device, Hollywood connections, documentaries and TV shows and now a General behind the scenes. Or is this really part of the same initiative that has a public and private component?
What was strange, the pilots said, was that the video showed objects accelerating to hypersonic speed, making sudden stops and instantaneous turns — something beyond the physical limits of a human crew.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: celltypespecific
You are loud and clear today so I see.
The United States Navy has basically admitted that UFOs are real. Here’s the weird: Very few people seem to care.
“The Navy has confirmed that the three videos that are in wide circulation are indeed recordings made by naval aviators, recorded during their training evolutions,” Susan Gough, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said in a statement. “The Navy has always considered the phenomena observed in those videos as unidentified.”
The NAVY is clearly communicating that the observed phenomena is ALIEN.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
Please let's try to have a constructive mature conversation.
The precise definition of "phenomena" is : "a fact or situation that is observed to exist or happen, especially one whose cause or explanation is in question."
The NAVY is clearly communicating that the observed phenomena is ALIEN.
Its not of earthly origin. We are living in a post-disclosure world many people especially on ATS are currently experiencing cognitive dissonance...which is understandable given the gravity of our current state.
We need to move the conversation forward and start planning for the Post-Disclosure word. Today is year one of After Disclosure :
1 A.D.
The fact that these UAVs display no flight surfaces or apparent propulsion mechanisms, and do not produce sonic booms or excessive heat that would be released given the hundreds of GigaWatts of power that we expect should be involved (Figure 3C), strongly suggests that these anomalous craft are taking advantage of technology, engineering, or physics that we are unfamiliar with. For example, the Tic-Tac UAV dropping from 28,000 ft to sea level in 0.78 s involved at least 4.3 × 1011 J of energy (assuming a mass of 1000 kg), which is equivalent to about 100 tons of TNT, or the yield of 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles, released in 3 of a second. One would have expecteda catastrophic effect on the surrounding environment. This does not rule out the possibility that these UAVs have been developed by governments, organizations, or individuals on Earth, but it suggests that these UAVs and the technologies they employ may be of extraterrestrial origin.
These unidentified craft typically exhibit anomalous flight characteristics, such as traveling at extremely high speeds, changing direction or accelerating at extremely high rates, and hovering motionless for long periods of time. Furthermore, these craft appear to violate the laws of physics in that they do not have flight or control surfaces, any visible means of propulsion apparently violating Newton’s Third Law, and can operate in multiple media, such as space (low Earth orbit), air, and water without apparent hindrance, sonic booms, or heat dumps [4]
OMG...I really am psychic !!