It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
One thing we never made clear was what Brexit meant.
Oh, I don't know. The same can be applied to the argument to remain - it's not clear what continued membership of the EU meant, except the gradual erosion of the nation state - although not advertised as such. Studies show the leavers were chasing issues of sovereignty, so that's what Brexit meant to many.
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: DoctorBluechip
Short answer: who gives a crap, London is the economic powerhouse of the world. Bow down beatchessszzz
originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: WhyDidIJoin
If that was the case we'd be the wealthiest nation per-capita and Brexit wouldn't be a problem because the whole world would want to trade with us, the British Empire died a long time ago my friend...
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
Point of fact:
France's GDP is now larger than ours in absolute and per capita terms because our economy has taken a kicking over the last couple of years.
The measure of GDP is not a good representation of how much economies produce; economists and international organisations prefer to compare economies at an exchange rate based on what money in each country can buy.
On such a basis, known as purchasing power parity, or PPP, the UK again comes out slightly ahead, by 2.5 per cent,
but both Britain and France are overtaken by India, Russia, Indonesia and Brazil, putting them in ninth and tenth places respectively.
originally posted by: eletheia
But if we are sharp off the blocks there are NEW markets out there and as
it takes the cumbersome EU between 7/10 years to make deals the UK can
be a lean mean machine
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
For example, many of people who convinced us to leave the EU have feathered their nests quite nicely. Most have made arrangements to cover their backs eg Nigel Lawson getting French residency, Jacob Rees-Mogg's hedge fund setting up in Dublin. Some have made a bit of cash by betting against the British economy eg John Redwood and Nigel Farage.
The EU made it clear from day one - the basic principles of the EU are not up for negotiation. What have we made clear since day one? Erm. Um.
One thing we never made clear was what Brexit meant. Back in 2016, we were told how good a Norway model was. Today, the same people are telling us that the Norway model would be almost treason.
Because the government is hamstrung by austerity, we are going to hurt badly when the EU takes its grants away. London alone will lose £500 million in support to charities and public bodies. Outside London, where the EU funds much more infrastructure, the loss will be greater. Does anyone really think the carpetbaggers behind Brexit give a toss about the North East?
originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Whodathunkdatcheese
I'm actually really worried about the $hitstorm coming our way. I'm as skint as one can be without being completely on my arse and I can't afford to take any hits...
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
originally posted by: eletheia
But if we are sharp off the blocks there are NEW markets out there and as
it takes the cumbersome EU between 7/10 years to make deals the UK can
be a lean mean machine
Look around you. What are the chances we will be quick off the blocks?
More importantly, what will those nations want from us? What do we have to offer?
We already have access to a lot of markets through the EU. At the beginning of April, we won't. We'll have to negotiate with each of them individually. Again, what do we have to offer? What will they want in return? Does anyone really believe we can get a more advantageous deal with less to offer in terms of goods, services and markets?
Even more importantly, who was telling us about these sunny uplands of the future? Why, the same people who stand to make a killing out of Brexit!
Note the past tense. They seem to have gone quiet on the subject.
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Whodathunkdatcheese
I'm actually really worried about the $hitstorm coming our way. I'm as skint as one can be without being completely on my arse and I can't afford to take any hits...
Well you for one should be glad to leave because if you are like ^^^that^^^
while we have been in the EU.
So in *Tonys* words "Things can only get better"? '
When you're down theres only one way and thats UP!
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: DoctorBluechip
I just think it’s funny when I hear people saying no deal will be fine.....but the military are on standby and we are stalk piling supplies ohhh and not ask about the boarder and just keep those figures all crossed and the economy will be just dandy
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Cassi3l
Would you rather we pander to fear mongers ?
Our economy has been doing well since the referendum regardless of what was warned by the same Euro supporting Doom mongers.
You never had it so good
before March the 29th
Or we're getting out while the goings good.
Italy in recession amid sluggish eurozone
Italy has the biggest government debt in the EU at more than €2.3 trillion ($2.6tn; £2tn). It is also the fourth-largest government debt in the world.
The country's debt burden as a percentage of annual economic activity is second only to Greece in the EU at 132%.
Last week, European Central Bank (ECB) president Mario Draghi said eurozone economic data had been weaker than expected and the risks to growth had increased.
Claus Vistesen, chief eurozone economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said that the overall eurozone figures "don't look pretty, but have been well telegraphed by the hard data and the financial market horror show in Q4".
www.bbc.co.uk...
Time to put the "Great" back into Britain.
originally posted by: gortex
I didn't say the situation in Greece was caused by the EU , they bent the finance rules to let Greece enter now they and Greece are paying the price.
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
But let's assume all will be well, the British economy is on an even keel, the economic disruption is short and painless - what makes you think London is going to spend that nine billion quid on the regions? Why do you think the regions, heck even parts of London, depended on hand outs from the European Social Fund even when our economy was booming?