Trans Activism and "Gender Affirmation" is Breaking Our Kids

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: pteridine

It actually IS the general consensus of the Endocrine Society.

www.endocrine.org...

Consensus is not science, nor is it evidence based medicine.

And as long as any/all opposing voices are threatened with loss of jobs, reputation, platforms, etc., "consensus" really means "coercion."

I blame MSM for indoctrinating children with gay and transgender propaganda. If one turns on any newer TV shows today being gay or transgendered is portrayed as being normal & in style. By watching TV one would assume that at least 25% of people are gay or transgendered, when in actuality only a small percentage are gay/transgendered, maybe 2-5% or 10% depending on the area. What's being portrayed via TV programming is starting to become the norm in society. 3/4 of my liberal cousin's children (3 out of 4) identify as being gay. 1 is clearly gay by his mannerisms & 2 of the others (1 boy/1 girl) appear to have adopted being gay in support of their gay relative. These three are teens. The 4th one is too young to identify as anything & appears to be on the autism spectrum. On the conservative side of my family, no one is gay/transgendered or appears to be gay/transgendered by their mannerisms. My nephew just joined the Navy & the others all have boyfriends/girlfriends of the opposite sex. I think
much of this phenomenon is caused by societies decadence and lack of any real problems. Also, in studies with rats and mice the more crowded a society gets the more individuals start becoming gay. I'm willing to bet that higher populated areas have more gay/transgendered percentages vs rural areas. I think soy products and certain plastic containers also play a role in the percentage of those who become gay/transgendered. I also believe hormone therapy can definitely turn someone gay, especially children. Imo, children should not even know what gay/transgendered is until they go through puberty. One day, probably soon, all this nonsense will stop, once society collapses again. We've seen similar things happen throughout history in decadent societies like Greece and Rome.

a reply to: Boadicea

Very comprehensive and well-thought-out post. It seems like lately, people are speaking up more and more. I'm so glad my kids are older. When my daughter was preteen, she was very gender non-conforming. She wore baggy Tshirts & jeans and hiking boots all the time. Hated pink and dresses, and perish the thought of a Barbie! It was all about climbing trees and tomboy things.

I shudder to think what she could have gotten sucked into, were she coming of age today. She is a beautiful young woman now, with a strong sense of independence, and a creative spirit.

When will people realize that clothing preferences, interests, behaviors, and personality traits vary widely among males and females, should be celebrated, and have absolutely no effect on the sex of the person. Not only do you NOT have to change your sex to be who you are, you absolutely CANNOT.

a reply to: Boadicea

If a person wants to dress like the opposite sex, if the person wants to be the opposite sex, then they should have that freedom to do so.

Children?


I say wait until the children are 18 before allowing any changes.


We hold off on children owning booze, smoking cigarettes until they are old enough, I think waiting until they are adults to finally make that decision would be a good thing.

a reply to: Boadicea

fake as in these ricky bobby gung ho gun polishing types acting like they care about the babies and kids

its hilarious.

dig through the threads about what we should do about border security or certain wars or police violence and protests and check out the tone of the posts

but many of these same people care about the babies and the kids

its a joke

originally posted by: kaylaluv

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: kaylaluv

Should schools / doctors / media be allowed to attempt to indoctrinate small children into being confused about gender and sexuality?

Should religious fanatics and other hardcore, narrow-minded conservatives be allowed to indoctrinate children into thinking they have to ignore their gender identification if it is not in alignment with their natal sex?

Are 99.3% of people trans, or not trans?

Use that answer to decide where the one size fits all should be allocated.

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: pteridine

It actually IS the general consensus of the Endocrine Society.

www.endocrine.org...

Consensus is not science, nor is it evidence based medicine.

And as long as any/all opposing voices are threatened with loss of jobs, reputation, platforms, etc., "consensus" really means "coercion."

Ahhh yes. All 17,000 members from 120 countries have been scared into their guidelines and clinical practices. Science and research have nothing to do with their guidelines and clinical practices. Give me a break.

a reply to: TinySickTears

If someone is against Open Borders that means they like hurting babies and kicking puppies?

Excellent op! Something is afoot in our society, and it is not healthy. Why is it happening? Who, really, is behind it?

Inches turn into miles.

This father in the article below is angry. He has been denied access to health information about his own child, because she is now 12. This is unbelievable! But, it is happening.

www.kcci.com...

IOWA CITY, Iowa (KCRG) —
A Coralville father recently found out he will no longer have access to his 12-year-old daughter's medical records, so he asked KCRG’s I9 investigative team to investigate.

Kevin Christians, of Coralville, said a letter triggered his concerns alerting him he was losing access to his daughter's medical records.

At the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, parents are no longer able to see test results, messages from doctors and other information once a child turns 12.

The letter said the hospital wants children at that age to be more active in their own health care. Christians said he believes 12 is too young to keep parents in the dark.

"If you get locked out of being able to see the health care records for your child, that makes parenting even that much more difficult, in my opinion," said Christians.

The letter from UIHC does not give the full explanation. I9 found the practice stems from federal law and all hospitals have a similar policy but not all of them start at the same age.

I9 has discovered one medical organization where the age is 10.

a reply to: DBCowboy

In that case, we should dress all babies and children in gender neutral clothes, and give them gender neutral names and gender neutral pronouns - until they are 18, and they can decide on their own what gender they are.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy

In that case, we should dress all babies and children in gender neutral clothes, and give them gender neutral names and gender neutral pronouns - until they are 18, and they can decide on their own what gender they are.

Huh?

What kind of dystopian nightmare are you for?


Do you think children should be able to buy and drink scotch? If not, then why do you think they have the mental ability to determine life-altering surgeries and medicinal procedures?

a reply to: queenofswords

Its important to realize that the EnvironMENTAList infected "liberals" are constantly fed Malthusian Doomsday propaganda, and that Malthus himself suggested encouraging homosexuality as a means of population control.

And that the Ruling Establishment types you can see their obsession with said environment, not to mention their disdain in the commoners and poor, in 'all' of their broadcasting.

The worlds is theirs you see.

Then the icing on the cake is to feminize and marginalize the strongest group of society as the ultimate long term means of crowd control.

There are girls having their first menstruation with 8 years. Like it or not, blame it on the hormones in our food if that helps you cope with it, children are a lot more sexual from a much younger age on than what we'd wish for (like 30 or so haha jk).

The problem in my view is that the approach of gender fluidity hasn't really caught much traction yet. But in a society where you're the best or a loser you're basically circumstancially forced to make a decision. The logic then goes something like this "I'm born m/f but I don't fit in so the solution has to be to apply all drastic measures to switch over to the opposite."
Of course that's dangerous and wrong and a good reason why there have been introduced a lot more individualistic shades of gender. They just didn't make it into the public mind yet.

I'm absolutely against hormone therapy before you're 21, the same goes for surgery, 30 would be better, because it's irreversible.
In a perfect world you can have days where you feel a bit manly dress up accordingly, the next day a bit more girly and all is done sincerely and in good fun. Striving for love, acceptance and joy. Not mutilation.
I'd say many of those kids in a gender-grey-area would benefit a big deal if somebody told them they can be themselves and not some over the top drag-monster recruiting little minions for their cult.

I just want to add I'm not against drag queens, just all of the self centered "artists" who don't do anything but want to be famous because they are so fabulous. That's wrong in any case.

a reply to: kaylaluv

more like keep them confused for 18 years and then they will decide while they're still under the effect of confusion, yeah that will work just fine

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy

In that case, we should dress all babies and children in gender neutral clothes, and give them gender neutral names and gender neutral pronouns - until they are 18, and they can decide on their own what gender they are.

Do you think children should be able to buy and drink scotch? If not, then why do you think they have the mental ability to determine life-altering surgeries and medicinal procedures?

They don’t. But they have symptoms. It’s up to a team of professionals to examine, diagnose and treat those symptoms.

a reply to: kaylaluv

When only 0.7% of humans normally end up being trans that TOTALLY makes sense!

Your crowds obsession with wanting to force society into propping you all up into a new majority is bizarre. How about wear it as a badge of individuality instead of yearn for this disaster of a groupthink uniformity?

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: Boadicea

fake as in these ricky bobby gung ho gun polishing types acting like they care about the babies and kids

its hilarious.

dig through the threads about what we should do about border security or certain wars or police violence and protests and check out the tone of the posts

but many of these same people care about the babies and the kids

its a joke

Your posts have become predictable, you are coming off as a npc.

You must be a great role model.🤣

originally posted by: kaylaluv

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy

In that case, we should dress all babies and children in gender neutral clothes, and give them gender neutral names and gender neutral pronouns - until they are 18, and they can decide on their own what gender they are.

Do you think children should be able to buy and drink scotch? If not, then why do you think they have the mental ability to determine life-altering surgeries and medicinal procedures?

They don’t. But they have symptoms. It’s up to a team of professionals to examine, diagnose and treat those symptoms.

When all the doctors are falling over themselves to hand out ritalin prescriptions to any and every kid out there, for "chemical imbalances" that cannot be tested or verified, what could possibly go wrong with all that idea there?

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

So you think it makes sense to force all children born with a vagina to have a girly name, wear girly dresses, have girly toys, just because? How is that individuality and not groupthink uniformity?

a reply to: kaylaluv

That's human nature (99.3% of it anyways).