Trump told to ‘resign or be impeached’

a reply to: Arnie123

He is threatening Michael Cohens father in law by twitter... you think that is unphased?
wow.... whats phased... or whatever the opposite of unphased is... lol.
It's like overwhelmed and underwhelmed. Is there a whelmed and does it equal satisfaction? or merely agreement that is emotionally unphased....lol.

a reply to: LSU2018

Compared to what Benghazi?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JDmOKI

Why are we hearing this now? You can't keep a secret in Washington

I think that Robert Mueller has proven that you can.

Or you don't have a secret to keep. Comrade

a reply to: CriticalStinker


There. Are. Two. Sites.

You know, just like Fox News and Fox TV (Home of the Simpsons).

a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey

I'm neutral and not a Trump supporter just stating a story from Buzzfeed or salon doesn't mean much.

I'm sure their next big story is Kim k and her dog break up

originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: CriticalStinker


There. Are. Two. Sites.

You know, just like Fox News and Fox TV (Home of the Simpsons).

You are right, I was looking at the wrong one.

Either way, your claim on 12 Pulitzers in the last two years isn't accurate.

Also, their news site isn't considered the most credible if you do a little research on it, they got a mixed rating in their factual output. Media bias/fact checker (note they recognize the two split and they are judging both)

I don't know if Fox is the best comparison, they're a toxic MSM brand that does clickbait like articles too, their factual rating is also mixed. Media bias/factchecker

So buzzfeed news, like many profit driven clickbait hell holes should be taken with a grain of salt and an ounce of skepticism.

He is now suggesting of backing out on reporting to Congress because he feels "his family is in danger" if he does... Is a Hollywood scriptwriter creating all this?

I haven't heard that. Where did that information come from?

originally posted by: Sillyolme

So trump paid the man for over a decade to only have him perform this one task?

wuuuuuut?

The guy is a tax attorney by trade, so you suggest he then became some inter circle political mover and shaker... I guess people need to say something to fit their narrative.

a reply to: Beach Bum

lol your signature...
you know what I'm gonna say right?

You can't handle the truth...

Buzzfeed may have brought the story but it is now being reported across the spectrum including FOX.

originally posted by: Speedtek
a reply to: LSU2018

www.archbalt.org...

They wanted to add an amendment to the constitution, not change an already existing one. Democrats want to remove the electoral college, that means they want to change it, and that means they don't agree with the constitution. This means they're not in office to do their job, which consists of protecting the constitution.

Cohen's father-in-law is a guy named Fima Shusterman. He's mixed up in the taxi cab medallions business.

originally posted by: SingswithChickens1

originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey

Buzzfeed, Unnamed sources, cohen seriously is this even a story?

Its the potential smoking gun, the story is spreading if there was nothing too it it would be fading. Trump calling Cohen a lair is laughable they are both lairs but Cohen records things, Trump wasn't happy about that with good reason.

I guess? But I've seen smoke for two years so I won't hold my breath

originally posted by: Sillyolme


I haven't heard that. Where did that information come from?

Hmm 5 second search...About 12,600,000 results (0.45 seconds)

Here is a quick one...

World
Former Trump lawyer reconsidering plan to testify to Congress - adviser
President Donald Trump's former personal attorney Michael Cohen is reconsidering his plan to testify publicly to Congress next month out of fear for his family, an adviser to Cohen said on Thursday.


Read more at www.channelnewsasia.com...

a reply to: Arnie123

Whine? Language alone is probably illustrated to appeal to low info leftist voters

Flinging mud... again...
oh well

originally posted by: SingswithChickens1
But Obama!!!
But Hilary!!!

Lock her up

Is now
Lock him up!!!!

Fox news is even carrying the story...
It took Trump and his supports to make Clinton look good..SMH

Fox News covers everything, even if it's just something to laugh at. But they still let their viewers know what's happening. It's a shame that the MSM doesn't do this.

originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey

originally posted by: Speedtek
I'm still curious to what the result should be if all of this was proven true? The responses so far have been 'didn't happen'

Deny, deflect, and when presented with irrefutable evidence, say it does not matter, then run away before your burst into tears...Par for this minority group of supports who have tied up who they are as people with a cheap orange con man...

This isn't a "what if" OP, it's a failed OP about Trump having to resign or be impeached.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey

Your OP is this...

Trump told to ‘resign or be impeached’

The answer is no. There is no reason to. He has done nothing wrong. Not one thing. Every week there is a new he will be impeached story. for two years.....

Where is Stormy Daniels?
Where is Michael Avenatti?
Where is Omarosa?
Where are all of the authors whose books were gonna take him down?
Where are all the women who said days before the election they were raped?
When will Don Lemon actually run a factual story?
When will the stories on The View take him down?
Where will the Morning Joe take him down?
When will Maddow take him down?
When will one of the night time show host take him down?
NO evidence that Russia assisted him in any way to be elected?

You have nothing. Basically the media throws # at a wall and comes up with a story...with no proof and retractions later in the day that are not run.

Yeah, but, WHAT IF! That's all they have now since BS only sticks to BS.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Trying to tamper with witnesses by intimidation? Snitches get stiches stuff?

What charge would congress bring to Impeach Trump?
Oh my, turns out Bill Barr, nominee for attorney general, has spelled out what would constitute obstruction by President Trump (witness tampering)

Obviously, the President and any other official can commit obstruction in this classic sense of sabotaging a proceeding’s truth-finding function. Thus, for example, if a President knowingly destroys or alters evidence, suborns perjury, or induces a witness to change testimony, or commits any act deliberately impairing the integrity or availability of evidence, then he, like anyone else, commits the crime of obstruction.

Source


Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also asked very specifically about this form of obstruction while questioning, Bill Barr, nominee for attorney general:

Graham: So if there was some reason to believe that the president tried to coach somebody not to testify, or testify falsely, that could be obstruction of justice?” Graham asked.

“Yes,” Barr replied. “Under an obstruction statute, yes.”

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JDmOKI

Why are we hearing this now? You can't keep a secret in Washington

I think that Robert Mueller has proven that you can.

If Mueller had one small tiny ounce of any sort of a fraction of a slice of evidence, it would've been plastered all over the news. You know it and I know it.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JDmOKI

Why are we hearing this now? You can't keep a secret in Washington

I think that Robert Mueller has proven that you can.

If Mueller had one small tiny ounce of any sort of a fraction of a slice of evidence, it would've been plastered all over the news. You know it and I know it.

Have you seen the news today?