Trump told to ‘resign or be impeached’

originally posted by: Willtell
What you don't grasp my friend is actually things have changed( for the worse) as you'll recall Trump is on Tape BEFORE THE ELECTION admitting to being a molester of women...

Okay, but this isn't that thread.

a reply to: Xtrozero

I'm sure that Muller has a messenger with a portfolio of information heading to your house directly, just stand by.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Speedtek

Per the article: "The special counsel’s office learned about Trump’s directive for Cohen to lie to Congress through interviews with multiple witnesses from the Trump Organization and internal company emails, text messages, and a cache of other documents. Cohen then acknowledged those instructions during his interviews with that office." - its not just what Cohen said.

And all of this evidence is sitting where?

Same place as the depositions from the Russian hookers - Fusion GPS's offices.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: richapau

Concentration camps? Reeducation camps, so that they can all learn to think "just like you"? That sort of jail?

Tell me, what's their crime--other than daring to disagree with your infinite wisdom??

Ooh, he/she got the ban hammer. 🔨



There is debate and then there's poison...

How is this any different than Obama/Holder pleading the 5th and using "executive priviledge" to avoid incriminating themselves over fast and furious?

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Looks like stage 1 of the Clinton-body-count anomaly.

"Lie for us or be suicided in a car accident/gym barbell/plane/shot but not robbed"

a reply to: Thecakeisalie

While he is running for office he murders someone if they do not find out he did it till after he takes oath of office then they need to waitf till he leaves office to charge him for murder and no murder that happens before he is in office is not an impeachable offence. To be impeached he needs to have committed high crimes or misdemeanors while in office. Now telling Cohen not to speak on certain subjects to Congress he had every right it's called attorney client privilege and is what that boot Cohen should have been telling Congress . It's why if you arrested and you go to a meeting room with your lawyer to discus your case they are not allowed to film or record your meeting because it is privileged communication and can not be used against you in court.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

trumps former lawyer turned rat?

and you're going with gateway pundit? But your going to decry Buzzfeed?

I love it when people rip me for using Gateway Pundit as a source, but then they turn around and cite someone like Buzzfeed, which has been caught pushing phony stories before.

originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: Thecakeisalie

While he is running for office he murders someone if they do not find out he did it till after he takes oath of office then they need to waitf till he leaves office to charge him for murder and no murder that happens before he is in office is not an impeachable offence. To be impeached he needs to have committed high crimes or misdemeanors while in office. Now telling Cohen not to speak on certain subjects to Congress he had every right it's called attorney client privilege and is what that boot Cohen should have been telling Congress . It's why if you arrested and you go to a meeting room with your lawyer to discus your case they are not allowed to film or record your meeting because it is privileged communication and can not be used against you in court.

There's a big difference between telling someone not to talk about it, and telling someone to lie about it. Words matter.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

But if Cohen actually has this on tape it's a whole different situation.

Possibly, I think it would depend on the wording though as criminal charges have to be proven without a reasonable doubt.

The alleged conversation being reported is that Trump told him to lie to congress, though we all know with sensationalized news these days aimed at profit, sometimes the wording may be a bit disingenuous.

For instance, what if Trump told him to plead the fifth on that statement, or simply not to comment on it, or not to bring it up. Those are all things people could certainly perceive (and rightfully so) as instructing him to lie. But the court of law and the court of public opinion operate on different parameters.

originally posted by: Speedtek

originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: Thecakeisalie

While he is running for office he murders someone if they do not find out he did it till after he takes oath of office then they need to waitf till he leaves office to charge him for murder and no murder that happens before he is in office is not an impeachable offence. To be impeached he needs to have committed high crimes or misdemeanors while in office. Now telling Cohen not to speak on certain subjects to Congress he had every right it's called attorney client privilege and is what that boot Cohen should have been telling Congress . It's why if you arrested and you go to a meeting room with your lawyer to discus your case they are not allowed to film or record your meeting because it is privileged communication and can not be used against you in court.

There's a big difference between telling someone not to talk about it, and telling someone to lie about it. Words matter.

What's the difference with pleading the fifth and not answering a question?

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey
Many of my posts in this thread were hyperbolic, and given to logical leaps that were not delineated. Several poster have pointed out that I can and should do better. I will endeavor to do so.

There’s a place for hyperbole. Used judiciously, it can help get a point across memorably (and used injudiciously, it can be hilarious – think of Monty Python’s Four Yorkshiremen sketch). But when it’s overdone, it can make the user appear hysterical, ridiculous, or even sarcastic...

www.theguardian.com...

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
The alleged conversation being reported is that Trump told him to lie to congress...

My old man told me to take a long walk off a short pier once. I disappointed him.

Translation for the metaphor impaired: If someone told me to lie to Congress I'd tell them to have sexual relations with their mother and all their dead relatives.

Yep. Cause we know Cohen has audio.

But how damning are the words Trump says? Its not a pro wiretap, could be edited etc.




a reply to: Sillyolme

originally posted by: proteus33
It's why if you arrested and you go to a meeting room with your lawyer to discus your case they are not allowed to film or record your meeting because it is privileged communication and can not be used against you in court.

Your honor and members of the jury, my client just stated to me earlier that in fact he did commit the crime, so can we just move to sentencing...

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
What's the difference with pleading the fifth and not answering a question?

The major difference is you are not speaking in your own defense so the prosecution doesn't have you to rebut any of their witnesses. It then falls on the jury to believe them and their credibility or not.

Just like the.."Hillarys arrest is just around the corner" threads..I'll believe it when it's shown.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
The alleged conversation being reported is that Trump told him to lie to congress...

My old man told me to take a long walk off a short pier once. I disappointed him.

Well you didn't disappoint us by not heeding that off kilter advice.

a reply to: CriticalStinker


Go do something with your mom.

Well, Im guessing they had friends in helpful places, not sure Trump has many friends in the swamp.

Remember when Mccain gave him the thumbs down ....

a reply to: EverydayInVA