TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

a reply to: xuenchen

Trump/Rosenstein/Mueller met for several hours in between Comey's firing and Mueller becoming Special counsel. McCabe was mad that he wasn't "let in" on what was going on.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Or maybe Reince Priebus...and/or Steve Bannon? The stealth bomber, Anthony Scaramucci (aka "Mooch") got them.

Neither of them were cabinet members.

My first instinct was Tillerson.

a reply to: xuenchen

Anyone still in position at this point is either part of the "Plan" or is unknowingly destroying "the other plan"

a reply to: Sabrechucker

IMO - The fact that Q is not waiting until Sunday night to post what he shared today (Saturday), points to this coming week as being a blockbuster.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Or maybe Reince Priebus...and/or Steve Bannon? The stealth bomber, Anthony Scaramucci (aka "Mooch") got them.

Neither of them were cabinet members.
My first instinct was Tillerson.

OK. Based on this time.com... , I guess Rex Tillerson and John Kelly.

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Or maybe Reince Priebus...and/or Steve Bannon? The stealth bomber, Anthony Scaramucci (aka "Mooch") got them.

Neither of them were cabinet members.

My first instinct was Tillerson.

You're right about that. This is his true cabinet timeline:



But none of those people are major red flags besides Tillerson. Perhaps they're using the word "cabinet" loosely. In which case I'd go with Priebus or even McMasters.

Another touch of Emerald Warrior



Maybe old news, but I haven't had a chance to watch any analysis videos.

Kind of intense. Good extended footage of the decontamination process.

It's not clear how the team arrived at the GHouse. It looks like some ground assets in play also.

Feelin the same vibes that the rats are going to be scrambling, pleading and desperate. Some will get squeezed hard.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Remember this scathing Sept 5, 2018 NYTimes article written by an anonymous someone inside the Trump Administration?

www.nytimes.com...

To the best of my knowledge, It was never publicly divulged who wrote it.

Replying to carewemust:

John Kelly? Doubtful. He spoke highly of Trump after his departure.

Plus he's a marine. They absolutely recognize the POTUS as the boss.

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
Replying to carewemust:

John Kelly? Doubtful. He spoke highly of Trump after his departure.

Plus he's a marine. They absolutely recognize the POTUS as the boss.

I was mentally recalling how John Kelly kept burying his face in his hands during several Trump press briefings. Didn't seem to be on the President's side in several areas.

I assume you feel the same way about James Mattis too.

a reply to: FlyingFox

While I don't buy into all his commentary/speculation however, the part showing the guy hosing down the helo caught my eye. Now that just seems highly unusual rather a training or actual real op. Is he spraying plain jane water or some type of chemical neutralizer?

a reply to: carewemust

Kelly and Trump's biggest disagreement was over Afghanistan. I don't know, I never got the impression that he resented Trump. And no I don't think Mattis would've been disloyal either.

Reince Priebus on the other hand, he comes off as a weasel. He had plenty to say to the media after his tenure:

Priebus on White House chaos: 'Take everything you’ve heard and multiply it by 50'

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

There are just too many who could be the 2 traitors, if you move outside the Cabinet. Since FBI attorney Baker specifically said the two traitors were in the cabinet, I think we should assume he meant exactly that.

Also, on another note, there are increasing calls for ADAM SCHIFF to be investigated for his secret (he thought) meeting with Fusion GPS's Glenn Simpson.
www.foxnews.com...

New qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

#2746

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3c93e1 No.5218735 📁
Feb 17 2019 02:04:57 (EST)

>>5217756
They were removed.
When was Page removed from the investigation?
What month?
July 2017? (Early)
When was Scaramucci hired?
July 2017? (Late)
Re: the ‘Scaramucci’ model
5:5?
Those who left (majority) did not have a choice.
ALL remained pro MAGA and loyal to POTUS?
Why are we attacked by pro MAGA?
The ‘establishment’ runs deep.
Logical thinking.
Q

NEW

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 17 Feb 2019 - 2:20:13 AM
www.whitehouse.gov...📁
www.whitehouse.gov...📁
Q

gettin wild

It's raining Q posts!

I'm digging this one:



qmap.pub...

a reply to: queenofswords

When Whitaker visited with the El Chapo prosecutors before the trial concluded, he wasn't there to shake their hand. Prosecuting a guy like El Chapo was easy. Whitaker was there to as CNN would say, "Get dirt". (That could be WHY Q continually mentioned Whitaker's temp role as being very powerful.)

I can see William Barr announcing bribery investigations into deep-state whiners (D+R politicians. Current and Retired) soon.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed
ANONS don't punctuate or phrase well, but I get it. Hope the millions who see his words will understand too.