What to expect if the 9/11 truth bomb does drop

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

It was unique....... it was miraculous.

No miracles. Just physics in a scenario that was unique

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

What does CD mean - is it short for something?

I thought you were making a claim by innuendo how the WTC was specifically brought down. If you were just making a general observation, then I apologize in that I thought you were implying something.

a reply to: neutronflux

I provided a video which points out the miracles that happened that day.
Watch it or don't watch it.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

I provided a video which points out the miracles that happened that day.
Watch it or don't watch it.

So you posted a video with no purpose in mind. Then there is really no point in watching the video?

a reply to: neutronflux

Dr David Ray Griffin has many good points that question the offical story....I always direct believers in the offical story to listen to what he says.

If you are a believer in the offical story..... I doubt you will watch it regardless of what I say.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

Dr David Ray Griffin has many good points that question the offical story....I always direct believers in the offical story to listen to what he says.

If you are a believer in the offical story..... I doubt you will watch it regardless of what I say.

Well that's just lazy

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

Dr David Ray Griffin has many good points that question the offical story....I always direct believers in the offical story to listen to what he says.

If you are a believer in the offical story..... I doubt you will watch it regardless of what I say.

Please quote where I ever said I believe the official account.

I just don’t believe the charlatans of the truth movement and their lies which is very different than believing the official account.

Can you cite physical evidence why I should believe the WTC was destroyed by planted pyrotechnics?

a reply to: mrthumpy

Lazy? How?

Did you watch the video?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

Lazy? How?

Did you watch the video?

Nope. If you can't be bothered to explain your point then it can't be all that important

a reply to: mrthumpy

Oh well nevermind then.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

Oh well nevermind then.

OK. I won't

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

Oh well nevermind then.

OK. I won't

I guess there was not enough credible evidence to create a specific point to argue. Other than 19 terrorist using 200,000 pound jets each load with about 10,000 gallons of fuel hitting objects at high speed can result in destruction and chaos?

a reply to: neutronflux

Is that your (conspiracy) theory?
Isn't that the offical story?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

Is that your (conspiracy) theory?
Isn't that the offical story?

I think it’s called reality,

Where does ATS put the no plane theories concerning 9/11.

LOL
Ludicrous online lies
CIA Pilot presents evidence no planes hit towers on 9/11 - Before you roll them eyes, READ
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Staff Edit - As per our long standing rules, any nonsense regarding "No Planes on 911" is sent to the LOL Forum where it belongs. This is not a reflection of the OP, simply the content posted.-

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Again...

Please quote where I ever said I believe the official account.

I just don’t believe the charlatans of the truth movement and their lies which is very different than believing the official account.

Can you cite physical evidence why I should believe the WTC was destroyed by planted pyrotechnics? Or cite what damaged the towers if it was not the jets tracked from take to impact by radar?

a reply to: neutronflux

Did I state that there were no planes?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

Did I state that there were no planes?

Do you have a point backed by evidence. Or you here just to play the innuendo game? Example. Some people will believe any lie posted by the truth movement.

a reply to: InhaleExhale

Show me 93 at Shanksville, and please don't show the pictures the FBI provided at the Maoussoui trial, they are false, and from a wrecked 727 not a 757.

As Miller and the cameras and everybody else said, there was no crashed airliner there.

Making a movie about it does not change the facts.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

What does CD mean - is it short for something?

Yes, Cognitive Dissonance.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: InhaleExhale

Show me 93 at Shanksville, and please don't show the pictures the FBI provided at the Maoussoui trial, they are false, and from a wrecked 727 not a 757.

As Miller and the cameras and everybody else said, there was no crashed airliner there.

Making a movie about it does not change the facts.

What do you not understand about a high speed impact.

Should be easy for you to quote the shanksville corner in there was no wreckage and there were no human remains if no jet crashed? Or quote workers at the site the jet wreckage was not buried from the force of the impact. Or quote where the DNA and personnal effects were not recovered.

Why would there be anything other than buried wreckage and a large debris field at shanksville? Anything other than a fragmented jet?