Elizabeth Warren Announces She Is Running for President in 2020

a reply to: c2oden

Well both sides do this, but the dnc could put an end to it and shut her down.
They wont imo.

Can you see this woman trying to deal with Putin?

a reply to: shooterbrody

again, you seem to purposely lack reading comprehension...

I imagine the Libs are worried as hell.
The absolute number one best candidate they have (not joking here) has thrown her lying, racist, rich-white hat into the draw.

They’ve already lost.

a reply to: Breakthestreak

the second one in a row at that

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
They’ve already lost.

No, and I think its funny how easily you dismiss liberals.
They supported Hillary ffs. They will support anyone. Lying? Hypocrite? You think it matters to them? Most of them are still sure Kevannaugh is a rapist.

This arrogany attitude will only lead to Warren as the president in 2020 or even worse. And I hope I'm wrong.

Who ever runs in 2020 is going to be destroyed.
Sounds like some backroom democrat convinced her to run so she sacrifices her self leaving 2024 the real goal for a new, charasmatic democrat

a reply to: gortex

Is this the same dim bulb who claimed n as five American status to get into Ivy league school that after her DNA test concluded she was about as much native American John Smith

originally posted by: gortex
The first contender has entered the ring today for the battle to decide who will face the Donald in 2020 , Elizabeth Warren thinks she has what it takes.

“I’ve spent my career getting to the bottom of why America’s promise works for some families, but others, who work just as hard, slip through the cracks into disaster,” Ms. Warren said in the video. “And what I’ve found is terrifying: these aren’t cracks families are falling into, they’re traps. America’s middle class is under attack.”

“But this dark path doesn’t have to be our future,” she continued. “We can make our democracy work for all of us. We can make our economy work for all of us.”
www.nytimes.com...

...

This does remind me a bit of how Barack Obama used to harp on and on about how the American dream was "getting by" - basically "not living in a cardboard box". I don't think that is the original definition?

To what degree can you let some manage to make the American dream come true (in it's full, Elon Musk kind of glory), if you aim to make everyone "get by"?

Will that be Nirvana or a sea of mediocrity?

The first president who manages to realize that his or her job is not to "protect the American people", but to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" should get extra points. Obama never got this right, and Trump hasn't thus far.

But I digress.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: narrator

I usually try to take the high road, but Elizabeth Warren is a special kind of idiot, and I will harp on her....

And I get it, the Indian stuff is getting old, but for me it's still hilarious.

Here is a piece of her policy I actually support.

It's a thread authored by yours truly. I and many others here are capable of saying when someone we like did something wrong, and vise versa.

Here's why I don't take her seriously though, she race baits, fuels division politics, and shes a wealthy white elitist.

Bernie at least walked the walk, quite literally so. He was pretty good about not bringing up division politics all the time, and while he was catching flak for being a white old man, not once did you hear him say that he was a few rows behind MLK in the marches. Not once did you hear him say that the only thing on his criminal record was for not leaving a sit in.

Bernie talked about policy and rarely resorted to slandering his opponent. I did not like most of his platform, and have no idea how even he planned on accomplishing much of it, but the man had class.

She will steal the dummies from his camp.

But the left can't unify, which is their folly.

Bernie could have beat trump in 16', instead everyone turned the other way when they sold him down the river to prop up hill dog, and here we are. But it's not their fault, it's Russia's, no accountability what so ever.

I think the best thing we can do for the left as citizens, is tell them how foolish they are and snap them out of it.

I do this with the right sometimes as well.

Rant over.

Yeah I think that Bernie Sanders is a better presidential candidate. He has a background in politics and is seems strong enough to counter the opposition's bluff and posturing.

He couldn't even hang onto the mic, let alone the nomination.

a reply to: DBCowboyHas she ever farted?
no, that explains the shiddy ideas

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: narrator

I usually try to take the high road, but Elizabeth Warren is a special kind of idiot, and I will harp on her....

And I get it, the Indian stuff is getting old, but for me it's still hilarious.

Here is a piece of her policy I actually support.

It's a thread authored by yours truly. I and many others here are capable of saying when someone we like did something wrong, and vise versa.

Here's why I don't take her seriously though, she race baits, fuels division politics, and shes a wealthy white elitist.

Bernie at least walked the walk, quite literally so. He was pretty good about not bringing up division politics all the time, and while he was catching flak for being a white old man, not once did you hear him say that he was a few rows behind MLK in the marches. Not once did you hear him say that the only thing on his criminal record was for not leaving a sit in.

Bernie talked about policy and rarely resorted to slandering his opponent. I did not like most of his platform, and have no idea how even he planned on accomplishing much of it, but the man had class.

She will steal the dummies from his camp.

But the left can't unify, which is their folly.

Bernie could have beat trump in 16', instead everyone turned the other way when they sold him down the river to prop up hill dog, and here we are. But it's not their fault, it's Russia's, no accountability what so ever.

I think the best thing we can do for the left as citizens, is tell them how foolish they are and snap them out of it.

I do this with the right sometimes as well.

Rant over.

Yeah I think that Bernie Sanders is a better presidential candidate. He has a background in politics and is seems strong enough to counter the opposition's bluff and posturing.

The problem with bernie

1. He sold out and spit all over his own message the minute he endorsed the queen of all that is wrong with politics hillary clinton. He should have endorsed none of the above like ron paul has done sith the GOP and kept his dignity and sincerity.


2. You shouldnt be trying to implement socialist ideals under a corrupted govt with numerous conflict of interest. It wont work and leads to the same gop and dnc cluster f of govt that we have. You need to solely concentrate on removing and minimizing the conflict of interest first . Then lets talk about socialist programs.

3. See issue number 1. Bernie sold out or was always comprised.

Dnc needs some freah meat that is not a fanatical left leaning hypocrite. Biden,sanders,pocahontas, oprah,obama are not it. Dnc goes with any of those and it will be another 4 yrs of the orange mean man.

originally posted by: interupt42

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: narrator

I usually try to take the high road, but Elizabeth Warren is a special kind of idiot, and I will harp on her....

And I get it, the Indian stuff is getting old, but for me it's still hilarious.

Here is a piece of her policy I actually support.

It's a thread authored by yours truly. I and many others here are capable of saying when someone we like did something wrong, and vise versa.

Here's why I don't take her seriously though, she race baits, fuels division politics, and shes a wealthy white elitist.

Bernie at least walked the walk, quite literally so. He was pretty good about not bringing up division politics all the time, and while he was catching flak for being a white old man, not once did you hear him say that he was a few rows behind MLK in the marches. Not once did you hear him say that the only thing on his criminal record was for not leaving a sit in.

Bernie talked about policy and rarely resorted to slandering his opponent. I did not like most of his platform, and have no idea how even he planned on accomplishing much of it, but the man had class.

She will steal the dummies from his camp.

But the left can't unify, which is their folly.

Bernie could have beat trump in 16', instead everyone turned the other way when they sold him down the river to prop up hill dog, and here we are. But it's not their fault, it's Russia's, no accountability what so ever.

I think the best thing we can do for the left as citizens, is tell them how foolish they are and snap them out of it.

I do this with the right sometimes as well.

Rant over.

Yeah I think that Bernie Sanders is a better presidential candidate. He has a background in politics and is seems strong enough to counter the opposition's bluff and posturing.

The problem with bernie

1. He sold out and spit all over his own message the minute he endorsed the queen of all that is wrong with politics hillary clinton. He should have endorsed none of the above like ron paul has done sith the GOP and kept his dignity and sincerity.


2. You shouldnt be trying to implement socialist ideals under a corrupted govt with numerous conflict of interest. It wont work and leads to the same gop and dnc cluster f of govt that we have. You need to solely concentrate on removing and minimizing the conflict of interest first . Then lets talk about socialist programs.

3. See issue number 1. Bernie sold out or was always comprised.

Dnc needs some freah meat that is not a fanatical left leaning hypocrite. Biden,sanders,pocahontas, oprah,obama are not it. Dnc goes with any of those and it will be another 4 yrs of the orange mean man.

I see the ability to compromise as a necessary tool for resolution of otherwise intractable positions and is vital for a politician.

I agree that Bernie should have pushed harder, he definitely had support should he have done so, but I also see that he may have had other reasons to withdraw at that moment.

He also was more 'socialist' than other candidates. I'm wondering if that would actually have been a bad thing. Perhaps elevating the majority is a better way to increase the greatness of a nation than denigrating the few?

Granting an arrogant, boorish and opinionated person who will not compromise, into a position of power over yourself, is a defeated weakling's act of sycophantic masochism IMHO.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Bigburgh

Comanche in chief

The Comanche while being incredibly vicious and often sadistic were a proud people and quite possibly the finest horse warriors/guerillas the world has ever produced. Definitely the cream of the crop in the Americas.

There is a lot to respect and admire about the Comanche.

That cannot in any way be said about Lieawatha.

a reply to: gortex

Oh, yaay...

I can hardly contain my excitement. A tingle up my leg, even...

a reply to: gortex

a reply to: Carcharadon

you are leaving out many other peoples, if we are just talking about People in so-called "American territories"

the Apache, Creeks, Seminoles, Yahi's/Yana's etc

though, the Comanche is among the fiercest

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: shooterbrody

again, you seem to purposely lack reading comprehension...

What did I miss?
Has she claimed to be African American now?

a reply to: CharlesT

Can you see her in a debate with Trump?

a reply to: shooterbrody

No, with what I said, you completely ignored (didn't read) what I said and went off on your "rant" about nothing on Topic of what I even stated