Should this Human be called a MAM or a SIR ?!

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: IncessantOptimist

isnt it seriptitious that someone just hapens to be filming this

Surreptitious? Doesn't seem to be anything secretive about the filming...

Did you mean serendipitous? Because then I would agree!

Can't have too many public examples of this bad behavior.

a reply to: Boadicea

mea culpa - thats what happens when i attempts to poast @ 04:30

i is having sleep problems

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Boadicea

i is having sleep problems

You and me both

So understood.

a reply to: TinySickTears

Nice to hear some WZ for a Saturday night.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: IncessantOptimist

Call them whatever they ask you to call them.

I'm not in the business of enabling somethings delusions. We don't enable people that are Schizophrenic.

Giving in to these degenerates is no different than accepting whatever delusional persona a Schizophrenic has from moment to moment.

originally posted by: Rikku
well she didn't act very lady like.
i'm all for genuine trans people but you cant just put on a wig or lipstick then demand the world owes you something.
though sadly, i'll bet the store issues an apology and retrains its employees to not offend angry guys in makeup.

No such thing as a genuine transgender. They are people with severe mental illness and as a society we either need to re-open the Asylums and stick these nutjobs in them so they can get help or just ignore their insane delusions altogether.

Not to disrespect anyone, but I honestly first thought it was Harry from Dumb and Dumber, and I'm not even thinking the installment where he ends up in drag and covers the house in melted chocolate.

To keep the job though, I would say: "I didn't say 'sir' madam ... I said 'zihr', which is gender-neutral. Forgive me for being foreign and mispronunciation - are you xenophobic madam?"

In the best case perhaps a bit of a rough diamond at the moment, assuming the clip wasn't staged.

If I got an S on my chest with a cape, does that mean I can jump out the window an fly?

a reply to: halfoldman

In the best case perhaps a bit of a rough diamond at the moment...

I appreciate and respect you wanting to give this person the benefit of the doubt, but no. Just not. In this case it is not warranted or appropriate. And it's downright dangerous to minimize this known and documented pattern of violence among a specific subset of the "T" community: the autogynephile. Transsexuals within the LGBT community have spoken out about them, lesbians have spoken out, feminists have spoken out -- and all are dismissed as "transphobic."

The following is written by a transsexual, Miranda Yardley: What Autogynephilia is, and what is it not; a brief note

This man is not a "rough diamond" suffering gender dysphoria. This is a heterosexual man who is sexually excited at "being" a woman and having others affirm his "womanhood" -- and currently in a violent (probably uncontrollable) narcissistic rage because someone didn't play their part in his sexual fantasy.

Shame and Narcissistic Rage in Autogynephilic Transsexualism (pdf)

This isn't a fluke and it isn't an exception. This is the norm for the current Trans Activists and their activism. Nor is it reserved for men behind a counter, but this same viciousness and violence is regularly inflicted on women.

genderidentitywatch.com...&cd=5&hl=en&ct =clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-1" target="_blank" class="postlink">Transwomen & Sexualized Violence

(ETA: The link won't format properly -- sorry! Probably because it's a web cache. Here's the web addy with spacing... remove the spacing and run it all together and it should work:

webcache.
googleusercontent.
com/search?q=cache:tE5OKgtpnE4J:https:
//genderidentitywatch.
com/transwomen-sexualized-violence/
+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-1)

When is 90% not Substantially ALL?

a reply to: Boadicea

Funny you know, I've been going the opposite way (as some of the mods and members who've seen my pics can probably attest to) - that is I've become increasingly my biological gender (luckily I never messed with it when I was younger and felt differently).

It's quite a revelation sometimes, yeah and I know it comes with certain expectations, but I have never acted that aggressively, and men my age generally do not.

But I find these days some women in general are becoming far more triggered and aggressive than men in general.
Not sure if they feel they can get away with it (at least in Western dominated societies), because they often can, without ending up in the emergency unit, as most men would if they acted similarly.

But for somebody who wants to be a trans-woman, that is just bizarre and ironic to me.
That is more Twisted Sister than Liza Minnelli.

Can it be that men are becoming the more gentle gender (as a generalization)?

I associate myself as a Marijuana plant.

As such I request to be labelled a 'Dope'

Coomba98

Is "hairspray metal" back under another guise?

Well they say popular culture is a bit circular and repetitive.

a reply to: halfoldman

But I find these days some women in general are becoming far more triggered and aggressive than men in general.
Not sure if they feel they can get away with it (at least in Western dominated societies), because they often can, without ending up in the emergency unit, as most men would if they acted similarly.

I'm seeing this also. Of course history shows that there have always been violent women, albeit in much smaller proportions than men. And I don't mean self-defense. I mean women as violent aggressors. It's very disturbing. I'm not sure what to make of it.

Sexual crimes as well -- every week there seems to be a new story about a female teacher sexually molesting students!

There's something going on.

a reply to: Boadicea

I think there's something hormonal going down, although so far the Libertarians have only discussed a drop in male sex hormones as a medical issue (so-called "soy-boys" and "cucks", for example).

But anger issues in women, like "borderline personality disorder" are becoming more frequent terms.

But thinking, if I wanted to be a woman, and I acted like the "madam" in the clip, then what were my female role-models like?
That's not even acceptable for a dude.

a reply to: halfoldman

I tend to think it's hormone-involved as well. At least in part. Probably biological/physiological reactions to synthetic hormones and other endocrine disruptors in the environment. I'm personally more familiar with the effects in terms of estrogen-dominant diseases and conditions, but I'm sure there's some effect on testosterone levels and functions and such as well, which would explain more aggressive and violent tendencies. That's as far as I've gotten though...

As far as the guy in the video, I don't think he can help himself. I suspect hormonal issues for him as well, compounded with emotional and/or mental issues. We don't understand hormones and how they work in the body well enough to know all the whys and wherefores. But I seriously doubt he knows any kind of happiness or peace or contentment in his heart... and he won't find it that way, but for whatever reason cannot do better. My heart goes out to him and I really do want better for him. But at the same time, it's foolish to ignore the very real danger such people pose to others.

This is what I find deceiving sometimes gender-wise in the Libertarian to Alt-right clips for men.

They are assuming that if men act more dominant again (assuming we ever did), then younger women will naturally follow.

No, you might just get your eyes scratched out.

a reply to: IncessantOptimist

That idiot is an idiot. I detected testicles. Possibly an Adams apple. Violent outburst of testosterone, check. Loud threats of bodily harm, check. Grunting, check.

My guess is : Idiot man with long hair and a purse. Final answer.

What?
That lady is just having her periods!
Oh - "women's business".
OK proceed, no need to interfere here.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: IncessantOptimist

Call them whatever they ask you to call them.

Wrong. I refuse to call a man as a woman. I won’t enable that kind of irational thought process and if my employer told me to do so i would quit that very second and its their right to tell me to follow along or fire me if I don’t.

However, a name is different.

a reply to: NightCall

I refuse to call a man as a woman. I won’t enable that kind of irational thought process...

If only that were the biggest problem! If I still believed that the Trans agenda only involved mental/emotional illness, I wouldn't have a problem humoring them while receiving appropriate treatment for the same reasons I didn't have a problem humoring my senile grandmother when she thought I was my cousin and my mom was my aunt. It didn't hurt my grandmother (or anyone) to go along, but it would have caused much confusion and consternation for her if I had insisted/demanded what she literally could not do.

No. My problem is that we're also (mostly?) talking about heterosexual males who are sexually aroused by being a "woman," and are sexually gratified when others pretend they are women... And I absolutely refuse to role play in someone's sexual fantasy. For one thing, I'm a married woman who has taken vows before God, and I intend to continue to live up to those vows, and that does not include making myself available for some other man's sexual fantasies. But the truth is that I wouldn't do it even if I weren't married.

It's also a power play. And their insistence on access to women's private spaces is creepy and predatory.

Unless and until the gender euphoric -- the heterosexual autogynephiles -- are weeded out from the gender dysphoric, I will speak out loud and proud every chance I get.