Angela Merkel: Nation States Must "Give Up Sovereignty" To New World Order

It seems Angela Merkel and her party haven't learned anything from when her party had opened the borders. Let alone the crimes that was committed by African/Arab Migrants in Germany.

a reply to: infolurker
Globalism is just the modern posh word for MARXISM!!! Never!!! This scourge needs to be fought off by any means necessary. We were warned about this back in the 1950's. McCarthy was right. Hollywood was loaded with theses Marxist devils and they had the power of film to subvert the minds of society. Now we have a social virus spreading. I just hope the host, which is the people, have a strong enough immunity to fight this off. In ending my rant I will quote Thomas Paine as this is how the globalist operatives are functioning.

"The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." Thomas Paine

a reply to: infolurker

There may already be a thread on this, but isnt there a theory that the EU is all run by nazi descendants/sympathizers and they essentially are the 4th reich?

I mean germany is the biggest gdp of the EU and basically runs the show, so essentially germany did end up conquering europe, just through economics instead of military might.

At the end of the day, europe can do what they want, just dont try to force America to go along w/ it.

originally posted by: eXia7
Man, I'm sure glad Trump isn't a EU/UN lapdog. This sounds horrible.

Yeah and the UN wants to make sure you can't use that word to describe it. Criticizing NWO is now a racist hate crime or something.

On a side note...which way's Mecca?

a reply to: infolurker

Meanwhile...

the new world order was only a "conspiracy theory".




I guess now it is a conspiracy fact. The only thing that stands in the way between us and them is the U.S constitution. Which they are trying desperately to undermine.

a reply to: infolurker

These people get away with these things because they and the media are all on the same side.

It does not help that the younger generation cannot see the conspiracy in the bigger picture.

Example - Cows have a reputation for flatulence contributing to carbon dioxide increases in the atmosphere. (Having grown up on a dairy farm I am far from convinced of this claim.)

The young people agree to eat fake meat so as enable the world cow herd to be reduced.

What they don't see is that humans also have a reputation for flatulence. Does this mean they would agree to have each other put down in the interests of doing their bit for global warming?

My guess would be yes; provided that its someone else not them, but of course by that time it would be far too late to see they have been conned.

Lol

You guys dont want a third round. Plz just sit down and stfu you nazi-lite.

a reply to: infolurker

Looky here, the "fourth reich" is coming with Merkel and other socialists' blessings...

originally posted by: Metallicus
Holy Christ, that woman is pure evil.

How is it that someone that evil gets elected to a position of power? She doesn't even hide her contempt for her constituency. She doesn't care what they want so how is she getting elected to represent them? It is a complete horror show over there.

She is a socialist, and one of the globalists who want a "New Socialist World Order." Although it is not the same as what the nazis did, it is very similar. The globalists like Merkel have already made it illegal, and even punishable with prison for daring to post videos of atrocities committed by radical Muslims or for condemning radical Islam. The nazis also shut down any voice which would dare go against the common good.

Justinavistjr isn't allowed to post or make new account because top secret wants my secret info and Facebook. mom taught me something, aint happening. so thanks t o all

a reply to: SoulSurfer

I was still in Middle School and High School when these...morons made those announcements about "the New World Order." Back then politics wasn't that important to me. In fact, it didn't even occur to me that such a "dictatorial" idea would be embraced in the U.S.

To this day i am still not sure if there are more than one "New World Order," or if they are one and the same. Giving up the sovereignty of your country is one of the worst ideas out there. Let's hope we are still on time to stop them from giving up our rights and sovereingty.

originally posted by: Assemble
I don't support globalism (but at the same time - I don't know if I care either way), but I imagine that the idea is that the short term pain of integration will lead to the long term gain of global stability and peace, if there are no borders.

Would just love for you to provide maybe, oh... ONE example of mass migration that led to "global stability and peace."

Thanks

originally posted by: eXia7
Man, I'm sure glad Trump isn't a EU/UN lapdog. This sounds horrible.

But Obama, the Clintons, Bernie and any Democrat running for any office is...

originally posted by: Assemble
I don't support globalism (but at the same time - I don't know if I care either way), but I imagine that the idea is that the short term pain of integration will lead to the long term gain of global stability and peace, if there are no borders.

At least this is the pipe dream. The reality is that people are people so there will always be fighting, crime, violence and etc.

The next step is probably to change people. Cue genetic engineering.

I don't see how it can be stopped though, even if it isn't right, because the technology exists for global travel, global commerce and global communication, so they are just trying to force people to catch up.

Unbelievable...You have no idea what they have in store for you...

a reply to: Iscool

I don't care, as a Christian I know I will be raptured, and as a Christian I know this world is going to get and is getting worse and worse. Eventually God is going to burn up this whole world anyway.

She's not wrong. If you disagree then you have a woefully outdated mindset of how the world should work.

I've said it before; we should dissolve the non-natural North American borders and allow free movement between Canada, Mexico and the United States.

There are a lot of caveats to that idea though. To name a few:

- The three nations must develop and sustain a welfare system on par or better than that of their counterparts.
- The three must adopt a universal health-care system on par or better than that of their counterparts.
- The three nations must not restrict the movement of the free people inhabiting the continent through border-checks and similar restrictions.

a reply to: links234

you're gonna get absolutely eaten alive for saying as much here, but i totally agree.

really really REALLY don't get the way so many people cling so desperately to their nationalist isolationalism. it's a very weird comfort blanket guys it doesn't even make any sort of coherent sense

originally posted by: infolurker
Don't you love it when the ruling elite knows what is best for you. Citizens need not speak as there is nothing that should stop the stripping of national sovereignty away from them.

Serious question for those that support Globalism. What good is going to come from flooding your nation with people from other nations that do not share any value of Freedom and Democracy? Do you really want some central non-elected authority (sometimes on another continent) making the decisions that impact your life and you have no say or recourse?

...

One might wonder, what the motives behind all this is. At one end of the spectrum, it's a Kumbaya-fest, filled with love for the people of the world. Rejoice, and flock to Europe. At the other end of the spectrum, it's an attempt to bring about the end of days - Satan, fire, brimstone - a bad time for all but those who think they'll be sitting pretty.

It's probably somewhere in the middle - the good old fashioned greed for money.

People in the western world have become so demanding. Jobs, a paycheck allowing a somewhat decent car, etc.

The rich people behind their tall fences and locked gates want cheap labor and cannon fodder. What better way than importing poor people of lower intelligence from 3rd world countries?

These people will churn out babies like there's no tomorrow. Plenty of cheap labor to wipe Ms Merkel's ass. And just imagine how well they'll fill the armies. Very handy whenever an elitist # decides it's time to move lines on the map.

While the elites couldn't care less if the world burns - they'll just eat their prime beef in their gated communities without having to care about violence or rape - it's puzzling how so many in the general population seem to welcome "diversity" with open arms.

Here's my theory: We men gave women an inch, and they took a mile. We put them in charge of things. We let them have a say in matters. We don't argue more than necessary with them - because we want to # them.

And an alarmingly growing number of men just slap their limp wrists together in pure joy over "girl power" and agree with everything - because they want to BE women.

This is what happens when a society is feminized.

We men agree with women who seemingly see no problem importing millions of potential rapists. Amidst all the #metoo, it's interesting how gang rapes by immigrants seemingly is treated like a "charming, cultural quirk", while women get hysterical if someone even lightly patted them on the ass.

And who do women vote for? Basically 3 kinds of politicians: Peabrains like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, hags like Merkel, or (time for a limp-wristed applause, y'all): Non-Christian immigrants.

Maybe the enthusiasm over immigrants is caused by people thinking all these men in their 20-30's standing in queue to get in have gender reassignments and turn into women with children? Because that's the official story. Women escaping war. Carrying a red cat in one arm and a child in the other. While studying for a business degree.

No borders, no wall. Simply no brains at all.

Are all women stupid? No - But stupidity spreads like a disease.
Especially among the new generation of soy boy cucks.

And the rest of us men just fiddle our thumbs and say "yes, dear".

I suggest a prescription of "more Bill Burr, less Oprah".

Look at Turkey, whose Christian minority (2% or less?) not exactly experiencing being treated "equally".

Is this what we want?

Even 10% muslims is too much in a western country. Because 10% will eventually turn into 20%, 30%, etc.

Because 1.8 children or less per "native" couple can't compete with 3,4,6 children.

Of course politicians want to disarm Americans. Because we can't have an opposition to the new world order.

I wouldn't put it past the ruling assholes to basically brainwash people into doing these massacres. Add a flair of "over-reporting", and you have a very compelling (at least to stupid people) reason to disarm Americans.

Because 30 round magazines kill people all by themselves.

Don't become as cucked as Australia or Europe, USA.

Wake up.

That goes for all of us - men and women - in the western world.

a reply to: links234

"She's not wrong. If you disagree then you have a woefully outdated mindset of how the world should work."
would you like to quantify that statement?
is it because you would feel less oppressed by the removal of the perceived freedom of others?
wiil you change your avatar status from oppressed as a result?

a reply to: continuousThunder

and another one
"really really REALLY don't get the way so many people cling so desperately to their nationalist isolationalism"
perhaps you could explain what "nationalist isolationalism" means?

"it's a very weird comfort blanket guys it doesn't even make any sort of coherent sense"
so perhaps you feel threatened by the idea of freedom since you view a sense of identity or collective as a comfort blanket.
your choice of words "comfort blanket" to describe this is quite telling.
not bashing you, just intruiged why you want to live under totalitarian regime.