It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Justso
a reply to: Boadicea
Sadly, it begs the question of is Trump serving the public or himself?
Surely, the "electorate" can see through his shenanigans. His politics are showing and not in the best light but very eye-opening for his "people."
If Trump falls, we all fall.
Think about who will end up in power
I like Mike Pence. Not as much as Trump, but I like Mike Pence.
originally posted by: chiefsmom
I'm starting to wonder, if he has all this info on people, that he should release and deal with, why isn't he? He should, in my opinion, just for the "people".
Maybe he is afraid of being off'd by the CIA?
I would be.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: CharlesT
If any political party deserves to be smashed into billions of subatomic particles more than the democratic party, I can't think of any more deserving. I say Trump should release the information and let the carnage begin because the public deserves nothing less.
Right, just like the indictments and jailing of Hillary he promised us during his campaign and is still banging that drum at his weekly rallies... it's been 2 years, why the hold up?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: carewemust
He has been holding on to documents that would be very damaging not only to the United Kingdom/Australia, but to Obama-era Democrats, and Mainstream Media personalities, as well.
If this is the case, are you concerned as to why he hasn't presented them yet?
I was, until I learned how much leverage President Trump gains. Most of the subjects of the documents (except those related to Bob Mueller's investigation), know who they are and what they did wrong. President Trump letting them know that HE knows, and will release them if they don't "play ball", is a huge advantage.
A fair point. Shouldn’t just be political ammo. However, having worked in and around dirty politics, there is a certain level of strategy required.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: carewemust
Personally I really dislike this
If there was corruption as seems the case, the info should be released immediately, not based in what is politically effective
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: carewemust
He has been holding on to documents that would be very damaging not only to the United Kingdom/Australia, but to Obama-era Democrats, and Mainstream Media personalities, as well.
If this is the case, are you concerned as to why he hasn't presented them yet?
I was, until I learned how much leverage President Trump gains. Most of the subjects of the documents (except those related to Bob Mueller's investigation), know who they are and what they did wrong. President Trump letting them know that HE knows, and will release them if they don't "play ball", is a huge advantage.
So equal justice under political guise?
That's insanity.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler
"Timing is Everything" -Q
Nah
Screw q
I am not about a me side winning or something
I want justice
Justice rarely coincides with holding on to the truth until its politically convenient
If the evidence shows corruption people have the right to see it
It shouldn’t only be available to the people when trump feels his opponents have wronged him enough
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: carewemust
Personally I really dislike this
If there was corruption as seems the case, the info should be released immediately, not based in what is politically effective
You have been prolific in your position and I'm actually glad you decided to participate in a thread you didn't start but a one liner just doesn't support your position here BlackJakal. This is more in line with something Silly would post. Defend your position here with something a little more substantial, OK?
originally posted by: BlackJackal
a reply to: carewemust
Yep, these are the words and actions of a stable innocent man.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Might have missed an explanation, but my question still stands.
Can Trump do this?
If he has evidence of criminal activity, why hasn't he released it?
Can he release it?
If not, WHY not?
originally posted by: CharlesT
You have been prolific in your position and I'm actually glad you decided to participate in a thread you didn't start but a one liner just doesn't support your position here BlackJakal. This is more in line with something Silly would post. Defend your position here with something a little more substantial, OK?
originally posted by: BlackJackal
a reply to: carewemust
Yep, these are the words and actions of a stable innocent man.
I think this comment kind of funny but, I welcome your input here.