Guardian: Manafort Met with Julian Assange

Maybe Manafort helped pass the DNC emails from Russia to Wikileaks?

a reply to: WeDemBoyz

that should scare every american.

The government goes looking for a crime, cannot find one, and makes a civilian pay the costs for them to look for more crimes.

There should be a law, if you are being investigated for high end political stuff, only political crimes can be prosecuted.

There was a crooked man, and he walked a crooked mile,


He found a crooked sixpence against a crooked stile;


He bought a crooked cat which caught a crooked mouse,


And they all lived together in a little crooked (white) house.

....Mother Goose

Who knows? In a few months they might all be living together in a crooked "big house". heh.

originally posted by: angeldoll



There was a crooked man, and he walked a crooked mile,


He found a crooked sixpence against a crooked stile;


He bought a crooked cat which caught a crooked mouse,


And they all lived together in a little crooked (white) house.

....Mother Goose

Who knows? In a few months they might all be living together in a crooked "big house". heh.

What does Bill's Peyronie's Disease have to do with this thread?

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: theantediluvian

Sources say? That's pretty thin. Sorry to see the Guardian going the same route as NYT and all the other politically biased news sources with all of their anonymous sources.

Wikileaks responded with a fairly strong denial that it ever happened.

There's nothing new about anonymous sources and most everyone denies everything. Anonymous sources led to Flynn's eventual downfall and the WH denied the claims strongly. An anonymous source led to the investigation that brought down Nixon and he of course denied any wrongdoing.

That said, we'd all prefer named sources and concrete evidence whenever possible. It's also really odd that this is only now coming to light if true.

a reply to: knoxie

It's not good or bad. It's what you do with the power and money.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Perhaps if the thinking public demanded higher standards by not posting and repeating so much poo. I know, seems too much to ask for, considering that about half of the western population doesn't bother with thinking any longer.

The Guardian is already walking back the original article. Funny stuff.
News Sniffer has the changes highlighted for anyone interested.
www.newssniffer.co.uk...

originally posted by: Witness2008
The Guardian is already walking back the original article. Funny stuff.
News Sniffer has the changes highlighted for anyone interested.
www.newssniffer.co.uk...

They went back and stuffed the article with weasel words.

originally posted by: crtrvt

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz

originally posted by: carewemust
$3 Million taxpayer dollars @ month for Mueller to go after tax-evaders... that sucks.

And how much money did Manafort surrender as part of his plea deal? Much more than the cost of the Muller investigation. So, this thing is really being funded by Manafort. Us taxpayers will actually come out ahead on this one.

Yup, Mueller actually bring cash IN thanks to Manafort! Thanks, Paul!

It might just cover the lawsuits and pay outs to those innocent people that Mueller convicted over the last 40 years. The wrongful conviction of the accountants with Arthur Anderson. Also the two convicted of a murder that Mueller knew they did not commit, instead he chose to protect his asset Whitey Bulger who Mueller knew committed the murder. Oh well, he made the US money by convicting someone that the FBI originally refused to prosecute, never mind the millions we have had to pay out to all the innocent people he convicted just to further his career. Seems to be a pattern with Mueller, anybody else would be up on RICO charges

Another thing, if this is true, why didn’t Assange make this public? I mean, Wikileaks is supposed to be about government transparency right?

a reply to: Propagandalf

Could this be the reason that Mueller rescinded his deal with Manafort? I'm trying to catch up on all the political intrigue after near two years of vacation.

originally posted by: DJMSN

originally posted by: crtrvt

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz

originally posted by: carewemust
$3 Million taxpayer dollars @ month for Mueller to go after tax-evaders... that sucks.

And how much money did Manafort surrender as part of his plea deal? Much more than the cost of the Muller investigation. So, this thing is really being funded by Manafort. Us taxpayers will actually come out ahead on this one.

Yup, Mueller actually bring cash IN thanks to Manafort! Thanks, Paul!

It might just cover the lawsuits and pay outs to those innocent people that Mueller convicted over the last 40 years. The wrongful conviction of the accountants with Arthur Anderson. Also the two convicted of a murder that Mueller knew they did not commit, instead he chose to protect his asset Whitey Bulger who Mueller knew committed the murder. Oh well, he made the US money by convicting someone that the FBI originally refused to prosecute, never mind the millions we have had to pay out to all the innocent people he convicted just to further his career. Seems to be a pattern with Mueller, anybody else would be up on RICO charges

Something to keep in mind.....Mueller's a Republican.

originally posted by: underwerks
Maybe Manafort helped pass the DNC emails from Russia to Wikileaks?

Maybe in the 1960's they did "courier work" in this manner. But today, you just press the "SEND" button.

Why would Mueller overlook something that was right in line with his mandate (Collusion with Russia), and instead indict Manafort on tax cheating? There's a lot of bull-chit in the air. Mueller's desperate.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: underwerks
Maybe Manafort helped pass the DNC emails from Russia to Wikileaks?

Maybe in the 1960's they did "courier work" in this manner. But today, you just press the "SEND" button.

In todays world where all communications can be monitored the old ways are really the only safe ones.

a reply to: olaru12

Republicans started this whole fiasco by paying for the Dossier before Trump became the nominee. I could care less what his political affiliations are, he is as crooked as all the people he provided protection for thru the years. Least we forget the Amerithrax case where Muellers FBI accused one and got it wrong, only to accuse another without much proof, and the guy then killed himself. Mueller is a specialist, provides protection to others by bungling everything

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Propagandalf

Could this be the reason that Mueller rescinded his deal with Manafort? I'm trying to catch up on all the political intrigue after near two years of vacation.

Who knows? But here's a picture of Mueller and Yanukovych, the same man Manafort was accused of illegally receiving off-the-books funds. These guys are all crooked.

Have you seen the "Counter" news from wikileaks, stating that they are putting their entire reputation on the fact that the Guardian Article is 100% BS? They used unnamed sources, no credible evidence, nothing to back up any of these accusations, etc. in Wikileaks own words:

WikiLeaks has since responded to the report by declaring its publication as the moment The Guardian let a "serial fabricator" "totally destroy" the paper's credibility. WikiLeaks is so confident of its claim, that it announced it's willing to put its money — and Assange's life — on the table.

Link here: www.dailywire.com...

a reply to: theantediluvian

It's also really odd that this is only now coming to light if true.

I agree.
Especially as the embassy logs have already been gone over.
Unless manafort was in the Pam Anderson disguise.