Guardian: Manafort Met with Julian Assange

The Guardian must have forgot that they already published Assange’s visitor logs.

Embassy visitor logs obtained by The Guardian reveal that Brittany Kaiser, a director at Cambridge Analytica until earlier this year, visited with Assange in mid-February 2017 to discuss the U.S. election.

Cambridge Analytica director met WikiLeaks' Assange in 2017 'to discuss US election'

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Interesting how this article is anchored by a last minute lengthy plea to US readers for $1M in donations.

Is the Guardian really that desperate?...It looks awfully like they're pandering to US leftists with click bait articles...in order to raise emergency funds.

We’re asking our US readers to help us raise one million dollars by the new year to report on the stories that matter in 2019. Small or big, every contribution will help us reach our goal.
(portion of fund-raising request)

www.theguardian.com...

More accurate than any of Xuenchen threads where you usually post your alt right fan fiction.

this explains trumps recent tweeting frenzy.

march 2016 - oh my!

a reply to: network dude

www.dailykos.com...

Why did Paul Manafort lie? Because it increasingly looks like the origin of the plan to attack the United States through stolen emails, false media accounts, and social media pressure didn’t originate with Moscow, it came from Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.

so now it wasn't rushah?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: network dude

www.dailykos.com...

Why did Paul Manafort lie? Because it increasingly looks like the origin of the plan to attack the United States through stolen emails, false media accounts, and social media pressure didn’t originate with Moscow, it came from Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.

so now it wasn't rushah?

that may stifle the MSM a bit as they continually refer to this as the "Russia probe". with no "Muh Russia", it's just another probe.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: network dude

www.dailykos.com...

Why did Paul Manafort lie? Because it increasingly looks like the origin of the plan to attack the United States through stolen emails, false media accounts, and social media pressure didn’t originate with Moscow, it came from Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.

so now it wasn't rushah?

In all fairness, wikileaks like the intercept use an encrypted drop box for leaks.

It's possible and alleged some hacked material may have come from Russia.

I personally believe they played both sides so we'd have the conversation either way, sowing distrust in our democracy. That's a guess with no evidence though.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: network dude

www.dailykos.com...

Why did Paul Manafort lie? Because it increasingly looks like the origin of the plan to attack the United States through stolen emails, false media accounts, and social media pressure didn’t originate with Moscow, it came from Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.

so now it wasn't rushah?

that may stifle the MSM a bit as they continually refer to this as the "Russia probe". with no "Muh Russia", it's just another probe.

whatever brings the bad orange man down

a reply to: CriticalStinker

I personally believe they played both sides so we'd have the conversation either way, sowing distrust in our democracy. That's a guess with no evidence though.

even our "allies" do this
why the need for the russian bogeyman right now?

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: theantediluvian

Sources say? That's pretty thin. Sorry to see the Guardian going the same route as NYT and all the other politically biased news sources with all of their anonymous sources.

Wikileaks responded with a fairly strong denial that it ever happened.

The Guardian is just another liberal outlet under the same leftist assumptions, they don't even hide it in their article as sourced,

"One key question is when the Trump campaign was aware of the Kremlin’s hacking operation – and what, if anything, it did to encourage it. Trump has repeatedly denied collusion." Et al.

I noticed nobody really responded to Wikileaks rebuttal as posted by ShooterBrody.

a reply to: Arnie123

I noticed nobody really responded to Wikileaks rebuttal as posted by ShooterBrody.

we all know wikileaks is "fake news"

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker

I personally believe they played both sides so we'd have the conversation either way, sowing distrust in our democracy. That's a guess with no evidence though.

even our "allies" do this
why the need for the russian bogeyman right now?

I never said we don't do it, to our allies even.

I'm not even trying to suggest anyone should be outraged by Russia pulling that stunt.

Russia is no boogeyman IMO, they'd need to get their economy doing better than Texas before I see them as a true threat.

China on the other hand....

a reply to: CriticalStinker

China on the other hand....

bah
a myth
an urban legend even...

More fabrication coming out through the outlets with this 'gem' lol.

They are just trying to put additional heat on Manafort because Mueller isn't getting what he wants outta him. Add to that, Mueller has said Manafort lied and broke the plea agreement - and Manafort has contested that saying, he's answered all the questions and doesn't agree with this characterization.

Add to that, Corsi contesting Mueller's characterization as well.

Things aren't going well for ol' Mueller... that's all this is, and we're just seeing an attempt to put additional fabricated heat on people, because they have nothing of significance.

That's what my 'sources' say.... lol... "sources"

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Interesting how this article is anchored by a last minute lengthy plea to US readers for $1M in donations.

Is the Guardian really that desperate?...It looks awfully like they're pandering to US leftists with click bait articles...in order to raise emergency funds.

We’re asking our US readers to help us raise one million dollars by the new year to report on the stories that matter in 2019. Small or big, every contribution will help us reach our goal.
(portion of fund-raising request)

www.theguardian.com...

More accurate than any of Xuenchen threads where you usually post your alt right fan fiction.

Your whataboutism is just adorable.

I bet mama is proud.

a reply to: Arnie123

What caught my eye in the Guardian hit piece was the description of what Manafort was wearing and the length of his visit. Seems such a strange addition to what must be irrefutable evidence in the heads of some. If I were providing evidence against someone concerning something so weighty, their attire wouldn't enter my mind. Could just be me.

The Guardian used to be decent reading.

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Arnie123

What caught my eye in the Guardian hit piece was the description of what Manafort was wearing and the length of his visit. Seems such a strange addition to what must be irrefutable evidence in the heads of some. If I were providing evidence against someone concerning something so weighty, their attire wouldn't enter my mind. Could just be me.

The Guardian used to be decent reading.

The Guardian is obviously hurting for $$$...and is hoping to tap desperate and deranged US leftists for donations by using yummy-looking click bait.

Fortunately, 'most' of us here on ATS are not too far gone to fall for their obvious 'come-hither' by gobbling it up, highlighting it...and spewing it out to the community at large.

a reply to: Witness2008


ya, he should have totally donned his ostrich jacket for this momentous occasion.

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Witness2008


ya, he should have totally donned his ostrich jacket for this momentous occasion.

Man with expensive clothes BAD!

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Witness2008


ya, he should have totally donned his ostrich jacket for this momentous occasion.

I wouldn't mind seeing some evidence before I repeat this as fact to my friends. After all, London has no shortage of cameras.

a reply to: IAMTAT


i can never remember if being elitist is good or bad with this crowd. i guess it depends on which thread you're in.

and, i didn't say it was bad, it's funny.