It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.) suggested the United States government would use nuclear weapons in a theoretical war against gun rights supporters who refuse to give up assault weapons. The Democratic congressman’s comments were prompted by a Twitter user’s response to an article about Swalwell’s call to force gun owners to relinquish assault weapons. The piece recounts how Swalwell “has proposed outlawing ‘military-style semiautomatic assault weapons’ and forcing existing owners to sell their weapons or face prosecution.” –Washington Free Beacon
John Cardillo, tweeted a warning about how Democrats are poising themselves to “eradicate the Second Amendment”, along with a link to an anti-gun op-ed by the Democrat lawmaker that was published in US Today.
Make no mistake, Democrats want to eradicate the Second Amendment, ban and seize all guns, and have all power rest with the state. These people are dangerously obsessed with power.
Don't Nuke me Bro
- Joe Biggs.
So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your #ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.
Right. Actually this is the same counter argument my roommate said in response to me saying second amendment is to protect us from gov tyranny. He asked how these weapons would protect against the vastly superior power and tech of the gov.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: MrPopularity
There's already a thread on this clown and his nuclear statement, as was pointed out in the other thread it was likely meant as a point that citizens with their AR's are no match for the government and their arsenal of weaponry, if a rogue government wanted you dead they could do it and easily without a fight. To think he meant it literally is a little hyperbole if I ever saw it.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: MrPopularity
There's already a thread on this clown and his nuclear statement, as was pointed out in the other thread it was likely meant as a point that citizens with their AR's are no match for the government and their arsenal of weaponry, if a rogue government wanted you dead they could do it and easily without a fight. To think he meant it literally is a little hyperbole if I ever saw it.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: MrPopularity
There's already a thread on this clown and his nuclear statement, as was pointed out in the other thread it was likely meant as a point that citizens with their AR's are no match for the government and their arsenal of weaponry, if a rogue government wanted you dead they could do it and easily without a fight. To think he meant it literally is a little hyperbole if I ever saw it.
He may have been a little stupid ...
But it is an interesting look into the mind, if you can call it that, of the left.
By Any Means Necessary, right?
Well of course. That’s the point of this discussion
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Back when the American revolution was fought the military didn't have the same edge over the citizens that they do today in the world of modern weaponry.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MrPopularity
It was real but it was in a tweet attempting to quickly rebut the notion that should the military turn on our citizens, the weapons we have will not be enough to fight them off, which, has long been one of the more staunch defenses against gun control. Yes it was a poor analogy, but that is what is was. A symbolic statement on the over all superiority of our military.
The Left has officially lost its mind…
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: MrPopularity
There's already a thread on this clown and his nuclear statement, as was pointed out in the other thread it was likely meant as a point that citizens with their AR's are no match for the government and their arsenal of weaponry, if a rogue government wanted you dead they could do it and easily without a fight. To think he meant it literally is a little hyperbole if I ever saw it.
He may have been a little stupid ...
But it is an interesting look into the mind, if you can call it that, of the left.
By Any Means Necessary, right?
To be blunt, it's my opinion that anyone who plays for team left or team right have lost it, you know the lights are on but nobody's home.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MrPopularity
It was real but it was in a tweet attempting to quickly rebut the notion that should the military turn on our citizens, the weapons we have will not be enough to fight them off, which, has long been one of the more staunch defenses against gun control. Yes it was a poor analogy, but that is what is was. A symbolic statement on the over all superiority of our military.
Interesting that the left is only tickled about the superiority of our military when they fantasize about using it to take over America.
: