Do women weaken nations

I hope I am not the first guy to point out there is no "us" or "anyone" without women, so do women weaken a nation, no, as without them there is no nation to weaken, this applys to men also, its called co existing, have a beer with a woman and get used to it, they not that bad......some of them

Compare Germanys government to how it was then to how it is now.

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: ketsuko

Dragon mom

Eh, I grew up in and around sports all my life and husband did not. That's the difference really.

Where I come from is that if it's not broke and not completely gushing blood, you rub some dirt on it and get back out there! As the years progress and you get actual trainers, it becomes ice and athletic tape with maybe some ibuprofen, but the principle is the same.

a reply to: Lumenari

RIP McSally

No.
And having seen some of the imbecilic answers on this thread, where trolls have tried to claim that 'Democratic woman' are weak, I can only snort derisively. Oh, hell, no.
This website is hitting new lows of stupidity.

If they are leftist loonies, and in politics, i would say yes. In general, traditional women have always been the backbone that has been the pillar of civilisation, tending to the base whilst the men went off to do whatever they had to do.But whilst i am not a feminist, nor a traditionalist, always being the middle-of-the-road type of soul - i would have to say in this modern world the women have really Really dropped the ball. I mean you only have to look at Sweden and Germany.

a reply to: continuousThunder

nah mate, not true at all. there are "discussions" that are unproductive, that go nowhere and give no answers, and we do not need to entertain them.

I disagree. It is only through discussions that are not tainted with ambiguous shallow answers that the truth of the matter reveals itself.

"hurr durr what if women are so weak they'll let the evil terrorist immigrants walk all over us" is such a prime example of this that i won't be surprised to see it in textbooks in the future.

One's perception and approach to a topic can either hinder or enlighten their ability to perceive the importance of the discussion.

also; heck yeah i'm emotional. it's who i am, i run hot. believe it or not, that detracts literally nothing from what i say. get this; the notion that if one party in a conversation gets emotional and the other remains calm, the calm one somehow ""wins"" is a fallacy.

Your are correct. Feelings, everyone has them, not everyone can control them. If you cannot control you emotional responses, that enters into the realm of the cognitive condition which does impair logical reasoning.

Look at how weak the nations have become who put old women in positions of power.

Merkel, may, Clinton.

Many countires have become extremely submissive the last 25 years

a reply to: anonentity

If you believe in the Bible, the very first woman on earth f'ked it up for all mankind to follow. Most of every Empire that has fallen was because of a deceitful woman or a woman that indirectly caused war by seducing two leaders (this even happens on a daily basis for normal guys). Before Women's Lib....America was a Super Power, after Women's Lib.....well...just look around you. America is literally on fire, and every country out there has the potential to take us out.

a reply to: IlluminatiTechnician

Sounds like you need to send all your women to other countries and then you cowboys will be just fine, not sure the breeding process has been clearly explained to you

Oh and no I do not beleive the bible

if women ran the world we would be better off

If woman in all the history of the world, were to lead all countries from the dawn of time until now, I sort of have a feeling that all the deaths attributed to wars, genocide and ethnic cleansing, slave and forced labor trades, religious wars, and much more, would be a tiny fraction of what it actually is.

So.. this is a stupid topic.

originally posted by: Jasona
If they are leftist loonies, and in politics, i would say yes. In general, traditional women have always been the backbone that has been the pillar of civilisation, tending to the base whilst the men went off to do whatever they had to do.But whilst i am not a feminist, nor a traditionalist, always being the middle-of-the-road type of soul - i would have to say in this modern world the women have really Really dropped the ball. I mean you only have to look at Sweden and Germany.

When a tribe beat another tribe they killed all the men and boys and took the women for their own. Women that didn't accept this, were probably put to death. This created an evolutionary pressure for acceptance of such, acceptance of such barbarians that would even murder their fathers, brothers, husbands and children. Evolution selected for such acceptance most likely.

originally posted by: fleabit
If woman in all the history of the world, were to lead all countries from the dawn of time until now, I sort of have a feeling that all the deaths attributed to wars, genocide and ethnic cleansing, slave and forced labor trades, religious wars, and much more, would be a tiny fraction of what it actually is.

So.. this is a stupid topic.

A dictator with WMDs would threaten their safety, and they'd give their liberty in exchange for safety.

There are some instances where women should be in front . When it comes to our Nation, I Know Educated Women Can lead properly..
Up to this point, Men were in the leadership role, yet the stone ages are dead and a new Sun is rising. Hold on...

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
a reply to: anonentity

If you believe in the Bible, the very first woman on earth f'ked it up for all mankind to follow. Most of every Empire that has fallen was because of a deceitful woman or a woman that indirectly caused war by seducing two leaders (this even happens on a daily basis for normal guys). Before Women's Lib....America was a Super Power, after Women's Lib.....well...just look around you. America is literally on fire, and every country out there has the potential to take us out.

yes a bok written by men for men, funny how they blame women for everything.
im guessing your one of those incel, mgtow types or got severely dumped.

plenty of women have saved societies and countries, mulan saved her country and is still revered, elizabeth I saved a country from the bankruptcy her father caused ect.
i could list all the messed up things men have done but i dont see men as lesser than women or better, they are human, all humans have flaws some bigger than others

I'll take one step further than the author of the YouTube video.
The JudeoChristian Value System is being actively destroyed. That is the true problem. Even if you put men back into male dominated professions and women back into theirs, as per the natural order of things, our country will continue to slide at the same rate. We need a revival and a recognition of our creator. This has happened before if you believe in the history of the bible.
If we do not recognize this, then we probably deserve to be destroyed. It's just unfortunate that there are so many, possibly even a majority, of people that agree with this. They just are not in positions of power, as the minority is and has been.

a reply to: anonentity

You make a lot of claims without any proof, O.P. And they seem to be based on bias. You would be surprised how often bias doesn’t hold up to facts.

Just some anecdotes - I’m a man, and I care about other people, I guess you would call me nurturing. That goes against your premise... and my mom is a woman, but she is pro-Trump and anti-immigration.

When divisions of all female soldiers head into battle against the muslim/Chinese/African hordes then I will say we're equal. When 1000's of women are POW's and interned for years then they will be our equal. When a woman subdues a violent 6'6'' man and arrests him I'll say she's an equal. Ever notice on the cop shows that the female cops kinda always just stand back a little when a violent criminal needs to be hand cuffed, they let the males do the 1st contact. Why do most females in polls shun the draft for females? Because of fear. You want equality then you need to die for it.

a reply to: IndyFront

You need a sperm and an egg to make a human baby. Barring some weird mutant process that I'm sure science is hard at work on.

en.wikipedia.org...

To put some balance into the whole idiocy of women being weak, forgiving creatures who are no good in a fight.
When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An’ go to your Gawd like a soldier.
-R. Kipling – The Young British Soldier

There's one example for you.

Or you could look at the Norse Shield maidens, Celtic warrior women and others such as Catherine of Aragon
Catherine of Aragon was Queen Regent, Governor of the Realm and Captain General of the King's Forces from 30 June 1513 – 22 October 1513 when Henry VIII was fighting a war in France. When Scotland invaded, they were crushingly defeated at the Battle of Flodden, with Catherine addressing the army, and riding north in full armour with a number of the troops, despite being heavily pregnant at the time. She sent a letter to Henry along with the bloodied coat of the King of Scots, James IV, who was killed in the battle.


More recently, look at how women raised kids and did 12 hour shifts in factories churning out munitions, fought for the right for equal pay, universal suffrage and other such things.

Underestimate them at your peril.

I am sure that when the first woman passes selection for 22 reg, she would be able to kick anyone's arse currently spouting off about how weak women are in this thread.