Do women weaken nations

The difference in the Psychology of women as opposed to men, seems to have a dramatic effect when the Women are in positions of great power. Where women are of a more nurturing nature, they don't seem to see much wrong in letting refugees in. Where men take a different view of letting strangers into the tribal land. Is this the main reason for the division at this present moment in time, will eventually end up biting the West on its ass? with any luck this guy is wrong but I can see he makes some very good non PC points, which if he is right, will cause great confusion which has no real solution.

a reply to: anonentity

Do you or the maker of the video which I admit have not yet watched... Have any actual statistics which supports women’s opinions on refugees being welcomed into their countries?

Or are these statements made because of a generalization of supposed women’s prevelant traits/beliefs?

Perhaps a side poll right in this thread could shed some light on the strength of women...

Like a simple question asked to the gentlemen who peruse this thread...

So on your honour gentlemen... whom in your household has the final say on the majority of issues?

a reply to: anonentity

not russian women

a reply to: anonentity

Not all women are nurturing. Not all men are territorial.

women weaken the whole world. without them all human life on earth would be gone in 100 years. the earth would be able to fix itself without us messing it up. although the same can be said for men, so humanity weakens the world is more accurate imo

a reply to: 5StarOracle


Its a bit like "Women tend to wear dresses" a bit of a given fact like Merkel and the state of Germany with its open border policy.

OP, are you a woman? WTF are you talking about? Incredibly sexist!

2nd line

a reply to: dashen


Good one!

This thread could have been so much more entertaining and possibly full of mod smack down, if the video the refugee question were not involved with simply the title of the OP and a little bit of well worded provocation...

lol... maybe some other time...

Then again perhaps this thread will end up heading in that very direction...

a reply to: anonentity

I don't know.

Some women are like that, yes, but other women are suspicious and slow to trust. They defend what's theirs fiercely.

a reply to: anonentity
I'm going to ignore your red pill sexism for a moment.

You assume tight borders strengthen nations. I say they don't. At all. The US work force's might post 1940 is a direct result of the immigration boom 1900-1930.

Also, with the low birth rate and stagnant wages in our country, without well-planned immigration, our tax base shrivels and the boomers and Generation X are SOL.

a reply to: anonentity

The video is about the idealism of Democratic women.

So yes, Democratic women will of course weaken a nation.

Has nothing to do at all about them being women... it has everything to do with them following a failed ideology.

Put a conservative woman in charge of the nation and you will see the difference.

For instance, Democratic women have no problem killing their children.

Conservative women will kill to protect their children.

Or their country.

Hope that helped.

a reply to: anonentity

I would have to say total fallacy. Liberals weeken the country. I can't speak for everyone, but my woman is the reason I wake up in the morning, have strong values, and why I care about a fiscally and physically strong US.

They don’t weaken islamic nations. Hashtag women’s rights, right?

a reply to: game over man



I am saying that their is a fundamental difference in the psychology of a male as opposed to a female. and in the modern world where Females are in positions of power in government, Where at no other time in history until the modern world, was that a fact, invading the male dominated corridors of power..... does that fact make a difference in essential political decisions which are made, that dramatically effect a countries well being? … it might.... because the males of that females country will not want any foreign males , to compete into the gene pool, whereas breeding age females like to peruse the largest available gene pool. At least on an instinctual level.

originally posted by: dashen

Not Russian women

Maybe we should let more Russian women in?

Mind you, I don't advocate we need another great depression or new world war to reverse the trend but, generally speaking, lack of adversity has softened the minds of most citizens and women even more specifically. Basically, metaphorically speaking, if the wolves were at the door, attitudes would change.

a reply to: Lumenari

Very well put.

As a woman and mother, I would die to protect my kids. They called me momma bear sometimes.

I feel the same kind of protectiveness in a general way, including protecting our country from threats, including the many negative impacts of illegal immigration.

The OP is indeed sexist. Many men are just as nurturing and protective of their family, etc. There are also many men and women who do not feel this way.

Even if the OP was attempting to generalize about the nurturing instinct, they are misinterpreting the effect this has on reactions to illegal immigration. This is just another example of the twisted view of Democrats. They "think" they are being protective and nurturing by welcoming illegals, but they are so messed up that they do not see what is really going on, and they are confused about who they should be nurturing and protecting.

TRIGGERED!!a reply to: game over man

a reply to: anonentity


The messages that are being sent out to the public more and more over the decades is us vs them.

It is the battle of sexes, that has existed and only grows with each year extremists gets their way.

With the increase in population many different groups are vieing for the power to control all other groups.

But with the absence of logic and reasoning for the sake of one's own rightousness it all ends badly.