It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: conspiracy nut
Or perhaps, chicano??? Beanie and long beard?? Sounds like ol skool chicano bangers description to me.
originally posted by: MteWamp
originally posted by: OzManHero
a reply to: theantediluvian
not much being said yet
Several people, including one officer, have reportedly been injured in a bar shooting in Thousand Oaks, California. A massive police presence is reported at the scene.
Unconfirmed reports say the shooter is still at large and that police are still working to secure the scene at the Borderline Bar & Grill.
How could THIS happen?
I thought California had strict gun laws.
You know, cuz it makes people "safe".
Isn't that why we have governments? So they can keep us "safe"?
No way this is real. Has to be fake news.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: KansasGirl
If it was a handgun, does it not stand to reason that it is likely to have been semi automatic, since most handguns are in this day and age? Or is this yet another example of nomenclature being deliberately designed to occlude the truth? And furthermore, if it was not a handgun, was it a rifle? You would have thought that even a person with literally no information about guns, other than what they will have seen in countless movies and television shows, would know the difference between a handgun, like a Glock or a 1911, and a rifle, like an AR-15 or AK. I can understand someone not necessarily being able to tell the difference between an AK and an ARAK, or an AR and an ARAK, or a being unable to tell whether a handgun is being merely shot very fast by the operator, or being a fully auto modification of a regular pistol or handgun, but I cannot understand someone not being able to tell the difference between a rifle and a handgun.
originally posted by: dreamingawake
Source
This interview with this man about the Thousand Oaks shooting is incredibly, incredibly sad: "I should have stayed. ... I'm 55. They're young. I should've stayed until he changed his clip. ... I'm so sorry. ... It still feels like I didn't do what I should've done."
Everyone needs to read what he said or listen to on video.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: KansasGirl
If it was a handgun, does it not stand to reason that it is likely to have been semi automatic, since most handguns are in this day and age? Or is this yet another example of nomenclature being deliberately designed to occlude the truth? And furthermore, if it was not a handgun, was it a rifle? You would have thought that even a person with literally no information about guns, other than what they will have seen in countless movies and television shows, would know the difference between a handgun, like a Glock or a 1911, and a rifle, like an AR-15 or AK. I can understand someone not necessarily being able to tell the difference between an AK and an ARAK, or an AR and an ARAK, or a being unable to tell whether a handgun is being merely shot very fast by the operator, or being a fully auto modification of a regular pistol or handgun, but I cannot understand someone not being able to tell the difference between a rifle and a handgun.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
Well, clearly they need to hire better guards is the theme I see arrising. Wtf kind of cheap ass rent a cops are not watching the hands of people approaching them and the venue? That what I really want to know.
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
That's what I thought when I heard the initial reports of long beard and beanie.