TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -13-

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Head spinning. Psychedelic. That might give one a seizure.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I edited and slowed down the frame rate - does it look healthier now?

Easier to read - but less hypnotic.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Much better!!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

If people do not have time to read the individual slides ... then you are wasting their time and yours.

I didn't have a chance to read anything.

Slow it way down is my helpful advice.

Otherwise it looks a lot like propaganda.

P

originally posted by: CoramDeo

I find it strange that people treat the handling of classified information, under US code, by Hillary Clinton differently than the mishandling, in fact, the purposeful revealing classified US information, by Assange.

Why does Assange get a pass?

Equality under the law, or no?

Hillary Clinton worked in Government. Julian Assange is a journalist. Assange doesn't relay classified information, he only REPORTS on what he gets, just like any other journalist who classified info has been leaked to.

When that information exposes corruption within Government, its good journalism. Don't punish the messenger, punish the corrupt.

a reply to: MetalThunder

Unreal. There seems no limit to the insane amount of corruption.
Where Eagles Dare.

Man, you're the encyclopedia of intriguing Youtube vids!

a reply to: pheonix358

Slower, readable version... Qualvation3.gif

Aside from qmap.pub... does anyone know where Q is posting?
/patriotsfight/ seems to be MIA.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

From the /qresearch/ board:

All Q's posts, archived at - qanon.app (qanon.pub) , qmap.pub , qanon.news , qposts.online

qanon.pub
qmap.pub
qanon.news
qposts.online

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
Aside from qmap.pub... does anyone know where Q is posting?
/patriotsfight/ seems to be MIA.

Q only posts to /qresearch/ and /patriotsfight/, if there is no action there it is because Q has not posted. Sites like qmap.pub and qanon.pub just re-post what they post there.

a reply to: daskakik

Correct!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: daskakik

Thanks for links & info.

a reply to: PlusUltra

Assange doesn't relay classified information, he only REPORTS on what he gets...

I disagree.

Vault 7: CIA Hacking Tools Revealed

Recently, the CIA lost control of the majority of its hacking arsenal including malware, viruses, trojans, weaponized "zero day" exploits, malware remote control systems and associated documentation. This extraordinary collection, which amounts to more than several hundred million lines of code, gives its possessor the entire hacking capacity of the CIA.

There is a difference between telling and showing.

If JIm Accosta's hairy half-brother Iwanna Accosta catches a tip and a drive with files showing the US has a clandestine Advanced Nuclear MIssile development program and reveals it's existece, that is one thing. We have an off the books program that flies in the face of nuclear treaties...blah, blah, blah. Good job, Iwanna, the American people need to know that.

If, instead, Iwanna pushes the entire content of the drive to the web, and all the mil spec documents, technical notes, test plans, etc., then you have gone beyond reporting. Iwanna just made it possible for other nations around the world to do grave harm to our country.

JA didn't just report on the CIA's cyber capabilities, he published the whole code base for the CIA's toolbag. He handed allies and enemies around the world tools that can cause us harm or monetary loss on a national or individual level. How many operations were comprimised as a result of that "reporting"? How many ears and eyes on terrorists cells, or not so friendly nations went deaf or blind because they now know our tactics, because of this hero's "reporting".

Those things we don't know are the things we should know to give our troops on the ground the advantage they need to stay alive, to be able to maintain tactical advantage and avoid or win combat situation in places we shouldn't be fighting, like Afganistan. People in real combat situations die becasue of the that lack of intelligence or compromised sources, becasue of a dick move by some genius reporter who thinks he is saving the world.

Tell that crap to the crying widows.

He's just reporting.

Not so.

Maybe the next time there is a weaping soldier on the other end of the line, and I'm at a loss for words, I can just say that the news cycle is more important. The people needed to know, and so did the enemy.

My apologies for being curt. Nothing personal.

a reply to: CoramDeo

So if you (a US citizen walking in the US) were walking along and found a thumb drive, or a thumb drive ended up in your pocket, and on that thumb drive were North Korea's plans for world domination ... and you put them up on the web, are you OK with North Korea having you arrested and charged with treason?

How about Russia?

China?

Iran where you could also be tried for religious crimes?

The US (Deep State) wanted Assange at any cost. He is not your citizen. Neither am I.

Assange did not commit any crime on US soil, therefore, he cannot be extradited.

Why can't you see this. Australian citizens are not subject to your laws!!!! Not at all!!! Not even a little bit!!!

And we really don't want to be ... not at all.

As we say in Australia, bugger off, Mate!

P

a reply to: CoramDeo

I agree with you. He went too far and he DID jeopardize countless operations across the globe. Unimaginable worst case scenario Mil / IC intel spill. He could’ve disclosed without revealing as much as WikiLeaks did. That was his discretion. It hurt our Nation, our allies and aided our countless enemies as small as midlevel gangs, human trafficking, illegal drugs, other contraband, terror cells, and in direct conflicts across the globe, Afghanistan and Syria for example, up to the nation state enemies like China or Iran.

I understand that he will do the right thing now. I understand he did do an impeccable job with disclosure in his career but this time he simply went too far, too much weight in the truth was used, it was already bombshell enough, the direct data was just too much. Exposed us to enemies in ways we can’t even discuss. So don’t for a second think he is a savior.

I also agree with you P358, he isn’t a US citizen I know that, that’s why I say he would be seen by our military as a single state aggressor and not simply treated like an individual leaker. He could’ve leaked less and still shown America’s dark secret without exposing direct op personnel. Intel altered forever. Massive problem for our country. He would’ve been treated like a great journalist that found the data and was proper and discretionary.

I believe I’ve explained it clearly enough. Q group, etc is using him for Justice. My guess it’s his half of the immunity. Otherwise he would be seen as an aggressor against our United States.

CA is gonna have a bad day pretty soon. Good for us. I really wonder what the msm will disclose. They’ve got to be afraid by now. Who’s going to shift first.

I suggest those who doubt Q should talk to their friends and family in service. Or go tour the Southern & Northern Border regions and look for our boys and girls. Secure like never before. You’ll believe. O7

a reply to: pheonix358

So if you (a US citizen walking in the US) were walking along and found a thumb drive, or a thumb drive ended up in your pocket, and on that thumb drive were North Korea's plans for world domination

You may be surprised to know, but I don't speak Korean. But If I did, I wouldn't trust the plan.

and you put them up on the web, are you OK with North Korea having you arrested and charged with treason?

No extradition treaty with NK

Or Russia

Or China

Or Iran.

Assange did not commit any crime on US soil, therefore, he cannot be extradited.

So what you're saying is that it would be perfectly fine for me to get on my laptop, wire your money out of your bank account into mine (theft), and there are no repercussions? I was never in your country, so no crime, right? I'm not subject to your laws?

It might be rare, but it has happened.

Australia hands over man to US courts

I have to say through this process I have come to believe it might be possible to trust authority figures.

My whole life I have not.

I have experienced corruption at many levels of authority.

I have hope this government will be more transparent and dismantle some of the bad that has been decades in the making.

So Assange leaked info that may have harmed government and operators but as we know there were and are bad actors using the cover of their position to take extreme advantage.

I have hope that's being fixed but anyone who has seen it knows there is a massive amount of clean up to be done.

Transparency is good.

A government honest to it's people as much as is possible is good.

Accountability good.

Here's hoping that fine line can be walked.

originally posted by: CoramDeo
My apologies for being curt. Nothing personal.

I agree that information that puts people in harms way should be handled responsibly.

I don't have enough knowledge at this time to determine whether the CIA is sinister,
friendly or a mix of the two. I don't know which information is classified because
it would put people in harms way, and which is classified to cover up crimes.

I'd love to be able to discern that. The amount of information kept from the public
is frustrating to the max and people like Assange are our heroes because
we are desperate to know what is going on in a Government that is supposed to be OURS.

Without Assange, I'd have never known numerous instances of corruption.

Did he go too far with some of his leaks? I guess he did. But even here, isn't the punishable offense
committed by the person who leaked the information?

a reply to: PlusUltra

Just look at info that is open source about top level government officials.

Look at what they have done and multiply that all down the ranks.

Also know that all of these organized "criminal" bad guys cartels , mafia and all the other "contractors" are also protected and on payroll.

A few get sacrificed now and then, play the roll of bad guy for the public.

Maybe Assange is also contracted and playing a roll.

Most people are, in one way or another.

It's an awful lot of clean up and most are some combination of bad AND good.

It's good to hear borders are secured but does that mean there aren't still trucks that get opened and closed back up and sent on their way?

Or ships coming in through military and commercial ports untouched?

Guns and drugs seem to still be pouring into Canada.

Don't know about humans because that part is never reported.

Can it really be stopped when it is such a huge part of the economy?

a reply to: CoramDeo

So what you're saying is that it would be perfectly fine for me to get on my laptop, wire your money out of your bank account into mine (theft), and there are no repercussions? I was never in your country, so no crime, right? I'm not subject to your laws?

Nice reply! I like it!

I think the situation would be different since in doing that deed, you also broke the laws of your own country viz: Wire Fraud.

This is difficult and Warrior above makes some great points. In Assange's defense, since he is not here: The US (Deep State) has him a virtual prisoner for years on end, I think in that situation I may play hard as well.

This is a difficult case, but the US hands are not clean. To put it another way, he relayed info he received about the US Spy agencies breaking all the world laws and conventions. The spies were caught and Assange decided to give as good as he received.

The US is not at all innocent here, especially wanting him eliminated. Just remember all the deaths around Wikileaks and others. Spies and assassins received a spanking.

Question: Did he damage the US network ... or ... the Deep State network?

Lovely discussion BTW.

P