It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: richapau
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13
Less guns isn't the answer either.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
...no man woman or child should have access to military grade firearms.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Nobody with any sense is saying an armed guard is 100% proof against injury, it just slants the odds.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13
I'm going to sound like a broken record, but one single shot rifle for hunting, a glock for personal protection because no man woman or child should have access to military grade firearms. Do you allow a hacker to buy a computer? sure, that's his right as a consumer, but do you allow him access to the CIA database? hell no.
There needs to be a line drawn in the sand.
Handguns were used in 19 times as many murders than rifles were in 2016, Handguns are vastly more common than rifles when firearms are used in crimes such as sexual assault, robbery, and aggravated assault, according to other federal data. Estimates from the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ National Crime Victimization Survey show that handguns were used in about eight times as many nonfatal violent crimes than other firearms in 2011.
Data on nonfatal violence by type of firearm after 2011 was not publicly available, “Little wonder then that a 2004 study commissioned by the Department of Justice found that the federal ban [on assault rifles] didn’t lead to any decrease in gun crime or gun deaths. For starters, rifles, assault or otherwise, are rarely used in gun crime,” Adam Winkler, a constitutional law professor at UCLA Law School, wrote in a 2015 Los Angeles Times op-ed.
Gun crime in the U.S. is “overwhelmingly handgun crime,” he wrote.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13
I'm going to sound like a broken record, but one single shot rifle for hunting, a glock for personal protection because no man woman or child should have access to military grade firearms. Do you allow a hacker to buy a computer? sure, that's his right as a consumer, but do you allow him access to the CIA database? hell no.
There needs to be a line drawn in the sand.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
The whole 'armed society is a safer society' claim, worked out just peachy for the 4 cops who got shot in this recent synagogue shooting.
originally posted by: seagull
Indeed.
I'm certainly as reliable as an ATS agent, or FBI agent, or Secret Service, or the military. Certainly it's not likely I'm going to run amok with my "military grade" weapons.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: underwerks
Columbine happened at the height of the CLinton era assault weapons ban.
What's your point?