It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Identified
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I agree. I think it's interesting how the media and FBI types keep saying it would be difficult to build when really we know it isn't but thankfully these sorts of crazies typically can't get it together long enough to get it right before they blow themselves up. He didn't even get that far but he still deserves jail time because of intent.
CNN had a bomb that looks just like the others, but came from a different delivery source.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: More1ThanAny1
A 9v battery would show as a giant cuboid with two prominent leads coming from them in an x-ray.
Yes it would.
Why would the FBI publish images on how to build a complete bomb?
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
We have xrays of two different devices.
NBC:
An X-ray image of one of the pipe bombs addressed to CNN and prominent critics of President Donald Trump provided by law enforcement officials briefed on the case.NBC News
"...one of the pipe bombs addressed to CNN..." makes it seem like CNN was targeted with multiple devices.
Here is a picture from ABC New York:
This looks like a different device than the one shown in the NBC article.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Guyfriday
CNN had a bomb that looks just like the others, but came from a different delivery source.
Actually, not.
CNN has an offsite mail depot. The USPS delivers there and a courier fetches the mail to the office. This was a clarification which was issued.
CNN has an offsite mail depot. The USPS delivers there and a courier fetches the mail to the office. This was a clarification which was issued.
originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: TheRedneck
Pretend for a sec that the clock could power the explosion. At best you have 23 hours and 59 minutes for the USPS to deliver your bomb to the target. It is simply not going to get there on time no matter how well you timed it with that clock.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Guyfriday
Antideluvian posted way back in the thread that the USPS does not always postmark if a package is too soft to be handled by their machinery.
TheRedneck
***EDITED DUE TO THOUGHT***
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Justoneman
There's a huge difference between being afraid of someone harming you, and trying to understand how they could harm you. The first is paranoia; the last is reasonable caution using science.
TheRedneck
Why did Law Enforcement alert the country (and the fake-bomb sender) 20 hours before Cesar Sayoc was captured, that they were focusing on south florida
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: More1ThanAny1
A 9v battery would show as a giant cuboid with two prominent leads coming from them in an x-ray.
Yes it would.
Why would the FBI publish images on how to build a complete bomb?
Why did Law Enforcement alert the country (and the fake-bomb sender) 20 hours before Cesar Sayoc was captured, that they were focusing on south Florida? They don't do that...normally.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Guyfriday
CNN had a bomb that looks just like the others, but came from a different delivery source.
Actually, not.
CNN has an offsite mail depot. The USPS delivers there and a courier fetches the mail to the office. This was a clarification which was issued.
Except that the CNN bomb parcel didn't have any post marks. We (being the other thread that you took part in) covered this when we were having the discussion about Parcels delivered through other than USPS services having the same legal protections.
Has anyone heard if the Postal Authorities are investigating this event also, or has the shebang been handed off the FBI and BATF?