It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mahogany
a reply to: Trueman
It better be all National Guard or this is just another step in our conditioning to accept military troops on our soil. All branches but NG are meant for operations on foreign soil, unless we are being occupied.
Remember a few years back when soldiers were being asked if they would be ok firing on American people? Around the same time people were talking about Walmarts being converted into FEMA camps?
Before you can use military to round up people, you have to make sure everyone is ok with the military operating within our borders. This scares me.
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Mahogany
a reply to: Trueman
It better be all National Guard or this is just another step in our conditioning to accept military troops on our soil. All branches but NG are meant for operations on foreign soil, unless we are being occupied.
Occupied, you say? Not sure what else you can call the millions of illegals inside the country already with 10,000 more caravanning their way here. This is an occupation, make no mistake about that, and it is an act of war.
I understand you're being dramatic but that is not true in any real or legal sense. It's just being dramatic.
National Guard has such vast resources that they could topple entire governments on their own. And their job is to protect our borders. Being at that southern border is what they exist for. And these are unarmed people with women and children, I'm sure National Guard alone can handle them.
Or are you advocating we need real military deployed to stop these civilians?
If you are, I'd have to ask myself as to your real motives.
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: Mahogany
a reply to: Trueman
It better be all National Guard or this is just another step in our conditioning to accept military troops on our soil. All branches but NG are meant for operations on foreign soil, unless we are being occupied.
Remember a few years back when soldiers were being asked if they would be ok firing on American people? Around the same time people were talking about Walmarts being converted into FEMA camps?
Before you can use military to round up people, you have to make sure everyone is ok with the military operating within our borders. This scares me.
I would consider 17,000+ heading to invade our country as a signal to send out our military. These people are painting swastikas on American flags and burning them. What reason do they have to come to this country they seem to hate?
originally posted by: deadlysyn
a reply to: mysterioustranger
Could not have said it better myself. They have said they do expect some kind of intervention of faith....but, no way does it look good.
Thanks
It's gonna get nasty, no doubt about that. But the warnings had been issued. These invaders know what they're getting themselves into and still have plenty of opportunity to turn back.
originally posted by: MarlbBlack
a reply to: Trueman
Good, only 800? Hope they don't get overrun
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Mahogany
a reply to: Trueman
It better be all National Guard or this is just another step in our conditioning to accept military troops on our soil. All branches but NG are meant for operations on foreign soil, unless we are being occupied.
Occupied, you say? Not sure what else you can call the millions of illegals inside the country already with 10,000 more caravanning their way here. This is an occupation, make no mistake about that, and it is an act of war.
I understand you're being dramatic but that is not true in any real or legal sense. It's just being dramatic.
National Guard has such vast resources that they could topple entire governments on their own. And their job is to protect our borders. Being at that southern border is what they exist for. And these are unarmed people with women and children, I'm sure National Guard alone can handle them.
Or are you advocating we need real military deployed to stop these civilians?
If you are, I'd have to ask myself as to your real motives.