Trump Administration Eyes Defining Transgender Out of Existence

a reply to: BenignChaos

The only rocks are the ones who think they can control the lives of others based upon intolerant ways of thinking.

I am sure bankers, ceo's,gun owners, and rich people will agree.

a reply to: neo96

What business do you have dictating their lives? What if someone decided to do the sane to you? The choice of how a person lives does not belong to anyone.

a reply to: CADpro

And what I'd that supposed to mean. Please clarify.

a reply to: BenignChaos

Your born a man and your drivers liscence issued identifies you as a man. Same argument for woman. Now none of us care what gender you think you are you just make sure when you go to the toilets it aligns correctly wit the biological born gender identified on your liscence. None of you new age whining about bigotry will change that.

a reply to: neo96

OK, thanks for the medical definition. In that case we don't have to be concerned that what the Trump Admin is "considering", will have any adverse impact on society as a whole.

originally posted by: BenignChaos
a reply to: neo96

What business do you have dictating their lives? What if someone decided to do the sane to you? The choice of how a person lives does not belong to anyone.

You seem to miss the point that nobody is dictating their lives to them. They can be whatever they want. They just wouldn't, for example, get to be treated as a female minority business owner if they were born a man but now identify as a woman. This makes sense since they aren't biologically a woman.

originally posted by: BenignChaos
a reply to: Aallanon

What a disrespectful comment. Anything is a mental illness if it doesn't fit the view of people these days.

then according to you here is no mental illness

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Do not act like you are better than I am because I stand up for a group of people that you dislike. The transgender community deserves better than to have this treatment.

a reply to: BenignChaos

I do not dislike people who claim to be transgender people. Its a case by case judgement.
Your now trying to mix the argument with emotive finger pointing accusations.
The demoncratic process will decide their legitimacy.

a reply to: MRinder

You do realize one of the biggest achievements a transgender person makes is changing their gender marker? Who has the right to deny that to them? It is their body, their right.

If you were a member of the LGBT community you would feel just as strongly about this as I do.

a reply to: BenignChaos

It is their body, their right.

Yes but they have no right to deceive people. I have no issues with transgenders as long as they have it identified on their drivers liscense and have their own toilets. In other words they are distinctively a different sex to natural born sexes. They are an artificially created sex.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Their legitimacy does not need to be addressed by any person but themselves. This is nothing more than butting into their privacy. Their privacy and their choice are NOT up for debate as much as yours is.

a reply to: BenignChaos

You seem to know all the ins & outs up & downs of the topic.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Now you would segregate them? I am picking up a very distinct repeating of history.

When in the bathroom, will you be the pervert checking genitals? Invading their privacy?

a reply to: CADpro

I'm a part of the LGBT community. This isn't the first time I've stood up for the right of privacy and happiness for transgender people.

a reply to: BenignChaos

Their legitimacy does not need to be addressed by any person but themselves. This is nothing more than butting into their privacy. Their privacy and their choice are NOT up for debate as much as yours is.

You twisted tounged Pinocchio. What do you know about respecting privacy, you willingly invade the privacy of decent folks all to serve your own selfish needs. Your a hyprocryte to the nth power.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

False attacks will get you nowhere. Never once did I invade the privacy of anyone. While you advocate the removal of their privacy, I argue for it.

a reply to: BenignChaos

False attacks will get you nowhere. Never once did I invade the privacy of anyone. While you advocate the removal of their privacy, I argue for it.

Strong words coming from someone who made their career out of portraying someone they are not.