Elizabeth Warren releases DNA results to prove she is partially Native American

a reply to: neo96



looks to me like she's sticking up for herself.

it's trump who calls her pocahantas incessently. he's a tiny man, that's clear.

he won't pay the $1 million either. he can't afford it - he has squandered the $400 million daddy gave him. lol

teeny tiny man.

there are three current threads about warren and her dna test. lol

it was revealed a few weeks ago that trump inherited $400 million in a super shady way. looks like kushner hasn't paid federal taxes.. like, ever.

but, warren's dna tests warrents multiple threads.

it's funny and desperate.

a reply to: knoxie

Looks to me she more than likely bribed someone.

The analysis of Warren’s DNA was done by Carlos D. Bustamante, a Stanford University professor and expert in the field who won a 2010 MacArthur fellowship,

www.bostonglobe.com...

Stanford!

Independently VERIFY it.

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: neo96



looks to me like she's sticking up for herself.

it's trump who calls her pocahantas incessently. he's a tiny man, that's clear.

he won't pay the $1 million either. he can't afford it - he has squandered the $400 million daddy gave him. lol

teeny tiny man.

Exactly. He's called her out incessantly for months (years now!) about this. She stepped up to him. And he backed down. By lying. That's a REALLY low thing to do. He should at least acknowledge that she called him on it.

a reply to: knoxie

teeny tiny man.

I beg to differ hahaha.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: knoxie

Looks to me she more than likely bribed someone.

The analysis of Warren’s DNA was done by Carlos D. Bustamante, a Stanford University professor and expert in the field who won a 2010 MacArthur fellowship,

www.bostonglobe.com...

Stanford!

Independently VERIFY it.

He's an expert in the field. Just because he works for Stanford doesn't mean he's going to put his career on the line by lying for someone. That's a bold insinuation Neo, anything to back that up with?

Hypothetical: what if every single DNA analyst is left wing? We just won't be able to know for sure, because every single one of them would be lying?

Not everyone is out to get you, and the right wing. Some people just like finding the facts. Whether or not the facts side with their beliefs.

a reply to: neo96


she bribed someone? please.

trump lied about a $400 loan - to YOU.

lol

a reply to: narrator

He's an expert in the field.

Don't mean snip.

Her party is famous for hijacking science for their own ends.

Look no further and the climate bullsnip and sex.

For effs sake there's now identifying as a DOG.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

What a bunch of HYPOCRITES!!!!

You mean like Trump saying this about Clinton bringing up the Access Hollywood tape?

"And I will tell you that when Hillary brings up a point like that and she talks about words that I said 11 years ago, I think it's disgraceful, and I think she should be ashamed of herself, if you want to know the truth."

a reply to: CriticalStinker

President PAWG.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: CriticalStinker

President PAWG.

How do you figure?

So Warren locked 1/32 of the native American vote.

Biden is leading polling.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

Jesus Christ, you could show a double feature on that ass.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: CriticalStinker

President PAWG.

♫ ♫ His milkshake brings all the bois to the yard,
And they're like,
Its better than yours,
Damn right its better than yours,
He can teach you,
But He'd have to charge (400 million)
♫ ♫

originally posted by: buckwhizzle
Maybe there's a 'Native Americans for Trump' group out there he can donate too?

Check with this chick:

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

Jesus Christ, you could show a double feature on that ass.

Presidential Storm(y) xxx.

or Pocahantas and Don Drumpf.

I don't want to either.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: narrator

He's an expert in the field.

Don't mean snip.

Her party is famous for hijacking science for their own ends.

Look no further and the climate bullsnip and sex.

For effs sake there's now identifying as a DOG.

Wait wait wait. Climate change and self-identifying have no place in this conversation so stop deflecting. We're talking about DNA results in this thread.

Now, let me get this straight:

You are saying that the fact that he is considered to be an expert in the field of DNA analysis doesn't mean ANYTHING, and ONLY because he works for Stanford? We don't even know his own party affiliation, and you're already dismissing the results just because of where he works?

If there ever were the perfect example of sticking your head in the sand to ignore something, this is it. You are so indoctrinated by your party, that you willfully ignore science, and facts, just because the organization where someone works isn't affiliated with your party. Talk about thought control.

a reply to: narrator

Sure are.

DNA is what we convict criminals on.

And Warrens results wouldn't convict anyone.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Sookiechacha

You used to have an avatar that eluded to Trump's dick, the Mario toad with a censored sign after stormy describe it as such. (I thought it was funny and probably pissed people off).

So don't be coy and get right to your point. Some things and some politicians are off limits. Just tell me the rules so I know for future reference.

I used that avatar to emphasize the culture of patriarchal politics during the Kavanaugh debacle. Not surprisingly, the subtilty went over your head.


This thread, as well as all the others on ATS this morning, serve to relentlessly mock Elizabeth Warren for a decades old form that she filled out, that Harvard then exploited, and then Trump exploited, to divert our attention from the serious political issues Warren forces to the forefront of social discourse.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: narrator

Sure are.

DNA is what we convict criminals on.

And Warrens results wouldn't convict anyone.

We also aren't talking about convicting a criminal. 2 different forms of DNA analysis.

But since you're openly admitting that you won't believe science that doesn't come from inside your camp, we've established that this conversation is pointless to continue to have with you because you'll dismiss/won't believe anything that doesn't agree with your political viewpoint.

I hope you'll decide to be a little more open minded, it's important in times like these.

dbl post