It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: Allaroundyou
Can I ask why you listed the places you did. Kansas, OK and Texas would be near last on my list. I could understand Washington state.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: Allaroundyou
A good portion of Kansas and Ok would be affected by the New Madrid fault line should something happen.
I can guarantee you I wouldn't want to be underground when it does! (if that is what you were referring to)
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: JAGStorm
SE Oklahoma is actually a pretty prime spot to ride it out, extremely independent people but not a lot of people. Prevailing wind patterns would protect you from fallout from nuke power plants or nuke strikes.
Abundant wildlife, mild to warm temps year round so planting some crops would be viable.
As the area used to be logged its extremely thick woods which would make hiding easy from quite a bit.
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: JAGStorm
Western Montana, near the border.
Zone 6 growing, plenty of critters to chew on, available water, fishing, fuel. Low population.
Competition for resources here means shooting the elk eating your tomatoes, as opposed to being in a knife fight over a can of spam somewhere.
A VERY limited access in the winter months for the Golden Horde.
Where I live, access to a few hundred miles of valley can be controlled by three checkpoints.
4 hydroelectric plants in the same valley... we used to pay $25 every two months for electricity.