It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BigDave-AR
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: Vector99
(Hint they all pretty much work the same!)
Epic!
P
P
Like I said in the other thread I’m giving dude benefit of the doubt in assuming he’s a troll and not that “special”.
originally posted by: pheonix358
originally posted by: BigDave-AR
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: Vector99
(Hint they all pretty much work the same!)
Epic!
P
P
Like I said in the other thread I’m giving dude benefit of the doubt in assuming he’s a troll and not that “special”.
Please! I can't find the other thread and I really want to see it.
Linky please!
P
What is a snubbing capacitor?
What is an electrolytic capacitor?
tantalum capacitors
originally posted by: charlyv
It matters not how many magnets and capacitors you use, or how you hook them up. Understanding the Laws of thermodynamics will save you a lot of time and money.
And no actually, there is no real need to go to school for this type of stuff or do some learning. Inventing requires minimal knowledge depending on the invention.
Either a big troll or so far up themselves and either way, I can't be bothered.
Not crazy, how does the solution by Nickn3 fail to meet that definition?
originally posted by: Anomaly0101
So I've been interested in "free energy" for a while. My definition of it is energy from a generator, that does not require I pay an electric bill or use any kind of fuel. Crazy eh?
That sounds like it meets Anomaly0101's definition of free energy to me.
originally posted by: Nickn3
How about a few solar panels and forget it. I power my entire cabin with just 6 panels.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: pheonix358
Either a big troll or so far up themselves and either way, I can't be bothered.
you can be bothered to post about my comments, but not be bothered to show me how I'm wrong?
If I'm wrong, I'm wrong and I'll own up to it, so show me it please.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: BigDave-AR
once you care to take the time and show me I'm wrong, I'll respect your thoughts, until then you are mindless garbage like phoenix spouting off about nothing that you neither know about, nor should be giving advice about.
People listening to you could literally face the prospect of their car lighting on fire because you THINK a certain wire is big enough.
You don't seem to have any experience in electrical other than your 'bumpin system'. Don't fool others into thinking you know what you are actually doing please.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: pheonix358
you linked wikipedia buddy, real good place to learn about electrical application. Seems you graduated from there.
1/0 wire can handle 150 amps max regardless the length of the run. Ampacity of a wire gauge doesn't change if its a shorter run. 1/0 can handle 150 amps MAX whether it's 1' or 100'.
apparently your reading comprehension is as on point as your knowledge of electronics
originally posted by: pheonix358
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: pheonix358
you linked wikipedia buddy, real good place to learn about electrical application. Seems you graduated from there.
Go down to the bottom of the wiki article and look at the section that has references.
Go read them.
In another thread linked above you said ...
1/0 wire can handle 150 amps max regardless the length of the run. Ampacity of a wire gauge doesn't change if its a shorter run. 1/0 can handle 150 amps MAX whether it's 1' or 100'.
You need to study up on 'Resistance"
It is an electrical term. It is measures in Ohms.
P
You need to study up on 'Resistance"
All the feedback matters, as I am learning from it. But please stay on topic I do not care about solar panels or the inherently flawed comments about the laws of thermodynamics. This is not one of those threads. I believe the laws of thermodynamics are constantly cited when it comes to topics regarding free energy and it's a quick scapegoat as I believe there is a coverup in the physics community due to US national security secrets. There is no such thing as a closed system. I am not proposing anything that approaches the speed of light, but as an example the laws of physics apply less as something approaches a significant fraction of the speed of light, and they are constantly finding things that do not match up with their predictions, such as photomagnetic materials being 100 million times more photomagnetic than predicted just to name one example. Thanks for the replies and I will have someone with a degree in electronics chime in eventually. He can call me crazy or whatever but I know at least one guy with a masters in electronic engineering and there are countless more online. You guys really don't need to clutter threads with your arguing, it contributes less to a topic than simply discussing things.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Not crazy, how does the solution by Nickn3 fail to meet that definition?
originally posted by: Anomaly0101
So I've been interested in "free energy" for a while. My definition of it is energy from a generator, that does not require I pay an electric bill or use any kind of fuel. Crazy eh?
That sounds like it meets Anomaly0101's definition of free energy to me.
originally posted by: Nickn3
How about a few solar panels and forget it. I power my entire cabin with just 6 panels.
Anomaly0101, the rest of your post does sound crazy but since the only thing that will convince you it won't work is for you to build it yourself and find out, I suggest you do that. I don't think any feedback anybody here gives you really matters to you, but if it does, Nickn3 already has the answer for the "free energy" you want.
originally posted by: BigDave-AR
Every time a swing and a miss making you look all the worse, it’s cute to watch and all but for the sake of the OP how about you stop hijacking the thread.