Ford friend Monica L McLean....HOLY WHAT????

Here's "Dr Ford" reacting to some questions.

Very telling.

AND, notice at the very beginning when her lawyer objects about "lawyer client privilege" when there really wasn't any.

He got snapped and smelled it but was helpless 😃

Ford on why she decided to take a polygraph test

oh-so innocent isn't she 👱‍♀️

a reply to: Vasa Croe

President Trump, up to today, has shown patience and sensitivity to CBFord. He has not criticized nor made light of her accusation and allowed the FBI to expand the background investigation and talk to witnesses.

So, this afternoon, we see his tone changed and he has become a bit more critical of her testimony.

He knows something already, I think.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Vasa Croe

President Trump, up to today, has shown patience and sensitivity to CBFord. He has not criticized nor made light of her accusation and allowed the FBI to expand the background investigation and talk to witnesses.

So, this afternoon, we see his tone changed and he has become a bit more critical of her testimony.

He knows something already, I think.

It was much more than a bit critical. He dogged her answers to a cheering crowd. He went all in.

So far the facts in the boyfriend's letter line up. It could be a fake but the FBI has the ability to corroborate better than I do.

Monica L. McLean was born the same year as Christine Blasi (1966) and signed a letter of support for her, identified as a member of the class of 1984 of Holton-Arms. In 1995 she was listed at an address on Falls Rd in Potomac, 5.1 air miles from the Blasey home, and is again using that address for her own law practice (FindLaw 2018-07-30)

In 1996 McLean then shares an address with Blasey in Malibu. In 1997 Blasey is in Honolulu, then from 1998-99 back in Malibu, before moving to Mountain View (next to San Jose in the Bay Area) in 2000-02.

I've not yet been able to find anyone else sharing an address with Blasey around Venice (2 addresses 1992-93) or Malibu (2 addresses 1995-96) Hard without a name.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
Or it could have been that she helped McClean learn how to relax her anxiety. Even non guilty people get nervous before taking a lie detector. She probably told McClean to "just relax and be honest, you have nothing to hide, if you start to get anxious take a few deep breaths", rather than the insinuation that she "coached" her to beat the test. I am sure that is how Ford heard the question, in the beating the test context rather than in the combating anxiety context.

Also if they were trapping her, the next question should have been, did you coach McClean on her lie detector test.

A big bunch of nothing to cover up the fact that Kav lied repeatedly.

Nope...Mitchell covered that too....

Too bad the transcripts don't reflect the squeeky voice tones.

🙅

For those of us that watched, it’s seared into our memory.

It’s....unfortunate

Its indelible in my hippocampus....

That has to be a meme sooni-sh

a reply to: Carcharadon

These are the words of someone who has nothing to come back with. Insults and more insults, very telling of how shaky your foundation is.

"Too delicious" right? You're eating the propaganda like hotcakes. I'm not the only one who sees it for what it is, there are others on the boards who see it, you just don't see them saying it as much as I do.

a reply to: Carcharadon

Not my first thought, but here you go.

My schadenfreude is over 9000.

#s hilarious, hell its like comedy hour on ATS right now.

Like sands through the hourglass, these are the days of our lives...

I give up trying to follow the plot any more. It is just a mess. How the hell can this be real life?

Honest to god, next thing a long lost person who disappeared 20 years ago after suffering amnesia when he fell from a yacht, who has suddenly regained his memory, will walk into the courtroom, and everyone will gasp, and strained faces will gaze upon the only one with all the answers to the case...

Mason Capwell will wax eloquently in his inebriated Shakespearean voice about there being tides in the affairs of men, before frantically running out of the courtroom clutching his breast, and it will all fade to black.

Marge, change the channel, Marge...

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Carcharadon

These are the words of someone who has nothing to come back with. Insults and more insults, very telling of how shaky your foundation is.

"Too delicious" right? You're eating the propaganda like hotcakes. I'm not the only one who sees it for what it is, there are others on the boards who see it, you just don't see them saying it as much as I do.

Like I said, beat it clown shoes.

I'm perfectly willing to debate with people that have something to say. You don't as evidenced by your vomiting up the same one paragraph nonsense in every thread.

Still not sure why you are on a conspiracy website bit whatever.

And again I say, shoo fly. No time or need for your inane nonsense.

Beat it.

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: Carcharadon

Not my first thought, but here you go.

Not bad. Not bad at all. Hopefully 4chan gets on it because there are some real clever Keks over there that could light the internet up with that phrase.

Stupid smart people.

Who need's 'em?

a reply to: Vasa Croe
Almost makes you wonder why they can’t take the lead from HRC and ditch paper for something more hammerable....

Er. Nvm. They got this

😉

a reply to: Phage

The Clinton's.

Kavanaugh is a target, he dared to question Bill Clinton
on his sexual conquests during the Clinton Impeachment
process ....which I am sure you know.

a reply to: burntheships

Yeah.

As I recall, a number of others did as well. But maybe not in the detail that Bart was interested in.

a reply to: Carcharadon

You think you can tell me what to do? Bahaha!

Read the first page of replies in this thread then go and check out those members' recent posts and I'm sure you'll see them regurgitating the same talking points over and over ad nauseam. You don't seem to have a problem with them doing it and I know why. Because you agree with them so you give them a pass.

You don't debate me because you have no foundation other than what the media has provided to you. Pretty bad when those you don't trust are the ones who have provided you with your fundamental viewpoints.

One simple question, what reason does the media have to make this ordeal (or any others they've talked about) headline news 24/7 other than to get you and others caught under their boot of influence? You are talking and bickering about exactly what they want you to be talking and bickering about. If they didn't want you to then why do they present it to you on a silver platter?

You guys are just as manipulated by the media as those you endlessly harp on about. The media has you right where they want you, talking about them and the narrative they are spinning for you.

a reply to: Phage

It's Brett. But who cares right?
As long as he is a privileged white republican he is fair game?

a reply to: burntheships

As long as he is a person who may occupy a life-time seat on the highest judicial position in the land (a part of a body of equal influence to the president and the Congress)?


Yes. Every decision he has ever made is of high interest.

a reply to: Phage

Of course it is important...

So then, was he wrong to pursue Bill Clinton's impeachment?

a reply to: burntheships

Pfft, he was a coffee boy at the time. Who cares?

Did he pursue the impeachment? Isn't that like, treason, or something?