Michigan Bigfoot?

a reply to: Sabrechucker


That would explain why he's outside, wouldn't it?

a reply to: Sabrechucker

So this guy and Bigfoot "made eye contact and froze in their tracks" but he whipped out his camera somehow? He says the Bigfoot ran off after they stared at each other and froze. That "Bigfoot" appears to be standing there looking at the camera, not running away. So I guess he must have meant "froze in his tracks" WHILE pulling out his camera and snapping pictures.

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Not really if you think about it.

Many of the sightings are surprise encounters. Mine certainly was...all the sudden, there he was. No chance, though I didn't think about it 'til it was much too late, to take even a blurry photograph with the camera in my glove compartment.

Even if I had, it would, likely, have been really blurry, 'cause to be quite honest, I was scared to death.

originally posted by: Bluntone22
One of these days someone is going to kill a bigfoot and its face will look blurry...

All those years people were taking perfectly clear photos, he just looks blurry...

Cameras aren't as good as they used to be. (sarc)

a reply to: rickymouse

I don’t know whether to keep kidding around or not?

So I will await your next reply.

I hope it’s a joke .

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Why does no one ever get an actual good and clear picture of bigfoot?

Probably for the same reasons you don't.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Researchers can find a mother bear, tag her, monitor her, know roughly when she gives birth, and monitor the mother and cub all winter. They cannot do the same with bigfeet? Why? At least the claims of Bigfoot being an interdenominational being acknowledges Bigfoot doesn’t exist half the time.

I do know sightings of Bigfoot in my neighborhood increases when I walk to the mailbox without wearing my shirt?

It looks like the subject has a hammer type tool if you zoom in.

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: neutronflux
Or why there is no fossil record, no evidence of a Bigfoot nest, Bigfoot lair, Bigfoot community, no evidence of their scat, no evidence of remains, no evidence of a Bigfoot burial ground, no evidence of baby bigfeet, why they never been shot, been hit by a car, or an ecosystem impacted by bigfeet, picked up by security cameras, by infrared imaging, picked up by trail cam.......

Every claim you you just made is patently false. Even a modicum of research and you would know that.

Really? Could you point us to some of this evidence?

Us? Do you think everyone else must be as deficient in knowledge as you?

If ya wanna see a Bigfoot you would just go where I said

On about twenty posts over 8 years or so near Seattle I90 at state hwy 18 go SE on that logging area road 5 miles south bamm u r there

It looks like a cardboard cutout. See the supports on the lower right.

a reply to: neutronflux

I'm sure there might be but government makes sure nothing of this subject is to be discussed,some times with threat of bodily harm seems extreme if nothing exists,yet they bring people to trial for less evidence

While it's a better pic than most of the blurry ones,etc., it still leaves a lot of questions.
a reply to: neutronflux

Actually, there is a lot of that. I wouldn't say it's officially confirmed yet but rather still unknown, and for many reasons.

Here's some evidence. It's a lengthy read but well worth it. If you want to skip to the findings they are on page 79.

From the Mount St Helen's Cascade Mountains area

Link

Edited to add:

Link to ATS story: www.abovetopsecret.com...

That's not Big Foot!

It's just some guy from Flint doing what guys from Flint do.

There is no Bigfoot. Grow the # up and abandon stupidity.

a reply to: EternalSolace

Classy.

a reply to: EternalSolace

#onlyyouropiniomatters

originally posted by: Bluntone22
One of these days someone is going to kill a bigfoot and its face will look blurry...

All those years people were taking perfectly clear photos, he just looks blurry...