Ford - Kavanaugh Hearings 9-27-18

a reply to: Sillyolme

but she definitely said she was not raped?
she was groped?
we are having a senate hearing over a teenage boy groping a teenage girl?

well done dems

originally posted by: Grambler
Well she is caught being wrong about not being able to hear them talking while she was in the bathroom, but her letter says she did hear them.

So at leaast one lie or misrememebring

NOW it becomes: Ford ASSUMES they were talking to others in the hall.
How many OTHER 'facts' did she assume?

originally posted by: neo96
Nice to see people laughing at such a 'serious' accusation.

Like RAPE.

Except that isnt the accusation....

she looks very scared and stand offish atm

Durbin has threatened her

originally posted by: Grambler
Well she is caught being wrong about not being able to hear them talking while she was in the bathroom, but her letter says she did hear them.

So at leaast one lie or misrememebring

She already testifies that she scientifically couldn't misremember. [/sarcasm]

Dick Durbin demanding an FBI investigation... delay tactic....again! These Democrats are becoming so predictable. It's clear that this is what they are going to try and use to delay a vote, even though the FBI has already explained why they are unable to do an investigation and why.

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
lied about hearing ''conversations''
cannot recall how she got home
edited ''inaccuracies'' in her letter

starting to fall apart

She remembers she didn't drive home, because you know drinking and driving would be problematic

originally posted by: neo96
ASSUMING they were talking!

Not evidence.

That's not what she said.

She said she heard them talking but could not hear the conversation.
I guess you don't understand what that means.

Never been in a situation where you could tell people were talking but not what they were saying?

Anyway, another lie by someone who has their mind made up.

Listen for yourselves folks. Don't trust the posts here

I really hope she is asked how she was able to exit the bedroom? She states in her opening statement that Brett and Mark locked the door behind them! Did one of them unlock it for her? Did she unlock it? She just says she ran out the door that was locked.

Durbin is full of it.

I am tired of this she had nothing to gain narrative.

What did fords classmate who liied and had to take back her facebook claoms she knew this happened.

What did the guy who recanted his story about kavanaugh rapoing on a boat have to gain?

What did the duke lacrosse accuser have to gain?

Yet they all lied or were wrong

a reply to: shooterbrody

but she definitely said she was not raped? she was groped?

Sexual assault has come to mean a great many things these days.

It's the inference that is damning.

originally posted by: SKEPTEK

originally posted by: stosh64
I cant take anymore, typical DC hearing.

I will be back for the 'cliff notes' thread that's bound to pop up later.

Ciao

I would do the same but I am hoping for a perp walk in front of the entire country.

Yep , real cuffs (well , zip ties would work better in this case) and leg iron stuff
And while at it , get old Dianne Al-Franken Stein.

a reply to: TinySickTears

no she clearly said '' i assumed ''

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: neo96
ASSUMING they were talking!

Not evidence.

That's not what she said.

She said she heard them talking but could not hear the conversation.
I guess you don't understand what that means.

Never been in a situation where you could tell people were talking but not what they were saying?

Anyway, another lie by someone who has their mind made up.

Listen for yourselves folks. Don't trust the posts here

She then clarified that she assumed they were talking but could not hear them.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight

Good observation! I'll start watching for that pattern.

TheRedneck

Why can't anyone else here watch this with impartiality?

Because this isn't Kavanughs first rodeo.

This should have been brought up 15 years ago when Kavanugh first got his job.

Nobody here has the right to judge or determine when a person in trauma should come forward.

Her facial expressions when she answered if she could be mistaken did not inspire confidence in me... first gaff I have seen though.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Grambler
Well she is caught being wrong about not being able to hear them talking while she was in the bathroom, but her letter says she did hear them.

So at leaast one lie or misrememebring

Dude she said she heard them talking but not the conversation.
Both are possible

a reply to: TinySickTears

She said she heard them talking but could not hear the conversation.

She clearly said they were laughing at her.

But she said SHE DIDN'T hear WHAT they were talking about.

Which could have been anything.

Another GD LIE.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: UKTruth
How comes she is so cogent about the science of memory now but can only talk in a baby voice at other times?

Quick-start acting lessons do that to amateurs on short notice.

Her voice stays steady when she is feigning the emotions too.

Fail.

😎🎻

It's almost like she has these little acting roles all too perfect. The crying trauma victim, the airhead who needs to keep the letters near her so she can use them to recall certain things, the genius who knows how chemicals and nerves in the brain sinc and function. It's seems too Sybil-ish.

Why would she need the letters to refer to now? She should every word on every page memorized. Also, she has the added benefit of other victims of Kavanaugh claims of abuse to expand and help validate her own experience.

What about a polished liar who happens to have a PHD in Psychology? Would they know how to act?