Ford - Kavanaugh Hearings 9-27-18

a reply to: TinySickTears

No I won't.

Biggest two reasons.

Is she was no where to be seen in 2003.

And she outright lied with her 'positive' ID when eye witness accounts are wholly unreliable.

And why forensic's science has become king.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Sorry....is that hair in her glasses bothering anyone?

It was driving me nuts.

Betcha a twitter page pops up for ut....lol!

Who is the idiot talking right now? What a weenie.

shes regretting this...
looking very sullen atm..

she knows she's doing the wrong thing in blaming an innocent man

you dont need a PHD or Masters to know it.

originally posted by: Grambler
I like mitchell so far.

Gett8ng the background before going further, and is very repsectful

Hopefully she gets to more hard hitting questions later

That was quite cleaver the way she weeded out the issue of narrative. Did they drink before they got there, or after. Nice

Enough FBI investigation BS from the Democrats! We don't care what you think the FBI should have done, Patrick Leahy!

originally posted by: LSU2018
Who is the idiot talking right now? What a weenie.

An irrelevant twat discussing irrelevant nonsense.

originally posted by: queenofswords
Hear we go with Patrick Leahy demanding an FBI investigation.

Yeah investigating an adult for the so called crime of a teenager.

As usual the left has it back asswords.

a reply to: Grambler

Almost pointless to watch. This 5 min rule will not let her do an effective job.

What a farce.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

I don't see that as unusual. I tend to get too "sciency" myself at times. It's a side effect of hitting on someone's educational forte.

TheRedneck

yeah, me to. that's why I do what I do. but it avoided the question. the didnt ask the mechanism of memory and neurotransmitters function in it tho.....they asked about how she was sure it was Kavanaugh

ETA: if you want to avoid answering a question, a good way to do it is to go off on a tangent and get technical so that the questioner may have zero idea what you are talking about or their eyes glaze over......pretty effective

leahy looks like he is angling to get into the next DC movie

he was almost believable as an elected official in batman vs superman

a reply to: neo96

Yeah I didn't think so.

Ok

baby voice is back on call.

Why wouldn't she just say yes, I was the object of their laughter?

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: LSU2018
Who is the idiot talking right now? What a weenie.

An irrelevant twat discussing irrelevant nonsense.

Absolutely. What a damn wimp.

I cant take anymore, typical DC hearing.

I will be back for the 'cliff notes' thread that's bound to pop up later.

Ciao

a reply to: Agit8dChop

Mitchell is extremely professional and respectful like someone else mentioned.

I was already surprised about the WhatsApp messages, I wonder what else they have? Also, I wonder what kind of questions she will be asking as this progresses...

Indelible in the hippocampus...

originally posted by: UKTruth
baby voice is back on call.

She probably learned that in those acting lessons.

a reply to: TinySickTears

Well I need something more than a left wing bread and circuses on capitol shill.

Like Arresting Kavanuagh and the OTHER one as yet no where to be seen.