It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: spacevisitor
Oke Baablacksheep who knows, so lets wait a bit and see what Ophiuchus 1 will say about it.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: spacevisitor
And Ophi is getting his copy I believe soon too! So maybe there will be things to talk about?
No problem at all Ophiuchus1 and regarding your last remark can I only say welcome to the club.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
originally posted by: spacevisitor
Oke Baablacksheep who knows, so lets wait a bit and see what Ophiuchus 1 will say about it.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: spacevisitor
And Ophi is getting his copy I believe soon too! So maybe there will be things to talk about?
As previously posted….it’s gonna take some time to get to it….I have other books in the que in front. I’d be lucky to get to it by this winter.
I’m not a speed reader nor a “reviewer/ writer” with any coherent verbiage sentence structures……..grammatically….I’m a short on words type of guy.
👽
I also do not expect a storm about Gary's book Baablacksheep, I expect instead a more calm like situation. Because of that certain in my view undeniable information in this book will definitely not make many people and especially Larry's opponents surely not that happy.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
Ha Ha, don't worry Ophi, I'm sure anything of value will be out in due course. I don't see much of a storm out there presently re it.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: spacevisitor
Hi Spacevisitor. It will only be of real value if there is conclusive proof of this or that imo. The Larry drama was some of the worst have ever seen and hope never to see anything like it again, regardless of who was there or not there.
The binary is also problematic but nothing compared to the Larry situation.
The reviews I have seen so far re the book are positive, yet in the same breath some bits am aware of from the book appear to contain some errors.
Again, I have not read the book and just privy to a small section. One or two things have caught my attention in particular the three alleged beings .
I am curious to the errors you mean here, but then, is it not so that every book written about the RFI so far is being considered by readers to containing errors.
Yes the beings are also spoken about and which is definitely one the hottest potatoes so to say, at least in my view it is.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: spacevisitor
I am curious to the errors you mean here, but then, is it not so that every book written about the RFI so far is being considered by readers to containing errors.
It is the Penniston chapter Spacevisitor so far, however it's for other's to correct or discuss.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: spacevisitor
Id rather not go into any details at this point Spacevisitor, and allow for those who are finding things that are questionable to bring them to light, , I am just observing things just now. As said earlier, the reviews are pretty positive re the book so far. There are a lot of games /shenanigans in this case as you will be aware Spacevisitor. The Penniston stuff and the binary is not clear cut at all . Anyway I don't want to get mixed up in the RFI drama, its toxic and deadly stuff . The being story, am told beings where present from the start ( Pennistons claims which he most certainly has not admitted to publicly ) . Of course there is much more to all of that. I am simply mentioning this as that element caught my attention when I was reading Heseltine's stuff.