Woman accusing Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct comes forward

a reply to: SeaYote

Bottom line, do you want the country's politics to so devolve that anytime one side wants to get their way and they have no other recourse, they resort to telling you that the person in question is the sort who will rape your daughter?

Remember, the pubic hairs on coke cans?

Yeah, he is sitting on the SCOTUS now too. It's not like this is an old trick. They've played it before and you seem to be an old fiddle. If Kavanaugh was the sort to indulge in this type of contempt of women, do you honestly think 65 of them from his past would have been so quick to come forward openly, not anonymously to defend him?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: SeaYote

Bottom line, do you want the country's politics to so devolve that anytime one side wants to get their way and they have no other recourse, they resort to telling you that the person in question is the sort who will rape your daughter?

Remember, the pubic hairs on coke cans?

Yeah, he is sitting on the SCOTUS now too. It's not like this is an old trick. They've played it before and you seem to be an old fiddle. If Kavanaugh was the sort to indulge in this type of contempt of women, do you honestly think 65 of them from his past would have been so quick to come forward openly, not anonymously to defend him?

]]]]]]

a reply to: Willtell

actually yes . I don't care if anyone appointed anybody . This is wrong on many fronts . No proof , just statements . all this is going to come back in the future and nobody will be innocent . All Dems and Repubs do is payback tit for tat bullcrap . Meanwhile the work for the people never gets done .

originally posted by: Kharron

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Kharron
We now know the woman whom Kavanaugh allegedly molested during high school as Christine Blasey Ford, a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, and two years younger than Kavanaugh. This happened many, many years ago but actions from someone's past must be considered, especially when that person could land a vital position, with no term limit.

Ford said that Kavanaugh pinned her to the bed, molested her and covered her mouth when she tried to scream. It was another boy, who was in the room, that broke them up. She did not speak about this to anyone until 2012, when she and her husband saw a therapist for couples counseling. Her husband also recalls the issue coming up in therapy and AP has verified the therapist notes from the sessions as well.

Ford’s husband, Russell Ford, also told the newspaper that his wife described during therapy being trapped in a room with two drunken boys and that one of them had pinned her to a bed, molested her and tried to prevent from screaming. He said he recalled his wife using Kavanaugh’s last name and expressing concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might someday be nominated to the Supreme Court.

The therapist’s notes say four boys were involved, but Ford says that was an error by the therapist. Ford says four boys were at the party, but only two boys were in the room at the time.

Ford had contacted the Post through a tip line in early July after it had become clear that Kavanaugh was on Trump’s shortlist to fill a vacancy but before the Republican president nominated him, the newspaper said.

At the same time, and before Kavanaugh's nomination, she contacted her representative in Congress, Ann Eshoo, who in turn contacted Feinstein. Kavanaugh has denied these allegations and 65 women have written a letter that he has always been respectful to them.

Considering that multiple people have had conversations about this incident, years prior to the nomination, it lends credence to the story that the professor is telling the truth. And yes, people can rehabilitate and change, and Kavanaugh may be a better man today, but my experience tells me those who wish to hide things, instead of being honest and dealing with the fallout, tend to have not changed that much.

Both Eshoo and Feinstein said Sunday that they supported Ford’s decision to come forward.

Ford told the Post she changed her mind about coming forward after watching portions of her story come out without her permission. She said if anyone was going to tell her story, she wanted to be the one to tell it.

Associated Press

Another one for the #metoo movement. Tell me folks, should an incident that happened decades ago be taken into account when considering a Supreme Court judge?

Personally, this man creeps me out. Not because he makes weird faces like Strzok did during his hearing, but because he does not react at all. He's like a photograph of a man. Always poker faced, and perfectly groomed for years with perfect positions, and then with a shady background and volumes of missing pages.

I'll leave you with a thought a friend of mine told me yesterday -- the first question to ask Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings:

"Would you, as a judge, rule on a case if you knew it had 90,000 documents missing?"

What's sad is something that may or may not have occurred decades ago is in the news and current Catholic priests molesting hundreds, maybe thousands, is not even a blip on your radar.

How do you know it's not on my radar? I'm looking forward to seeing what comes out of the unprecedented summit the Pope called in February.

What I'm concerned about is the immediacy of this issue, with a confirmation pending. What concerns me is not only this sexual allegation but also the thousands of pages from the Bush era. I understand that some things are classified, but Senators have those clearances. And documents can be redacted. And summaries of decisions are included -- I just wish we could see what judges voted and wrote such things as the Patriot Act. Did he have anything to do with this NWO tool, and if he thinks surveillance of Americans is ok.

If he did then I don't want this NWO a-hole anywhere near our Supreme Court.

Am I right? Do you?

I don't care who nominated him, if it's Trump, or Obama or JFK resurrected -- I don't care. I want to know his involvement with those important NWO acts passed under Bush and I want to know where this sexual allegation will go. Until that is known, I cannot support this guy.

Did you have a care of surveillance when the previous admins were doing it?

He is a federal judge...you can look up any and all of his judicial findings....you cant look up what was done in the background.

Trouble is....most, likely including you, have not looked up anything past what MSM has said.

originally posted by: Guyfriday

This seems to be the basic jest of what's going on, now the area I'm having issues with is the facts that are being presented. We don't know if she was drinking at this party or not. This would be important since is would show that she may have been confused about the facts

She admits that she had been drinking, and can not remember most
of the "facts"... So that right there and it has been 30+ years since...

Not credible in any way....

Anyone post this bit of possibly game-changing info yet?

mobile.twitter.com...

mobile.twitter.com...


Read the threads!

originally posted by: Tempter
Anyone post this bit of possibly game-changing info yet?

mobile.twitter.com...

mobile.twitter.com...

Read the threads!

I was just reading that bombshell. That information indicates that
Brett Kavanaugh's mother was a presiding judge in a foreclosure
case against Christine's parents!?

I wonder if Wa Po did any background checks on their accuser?

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: theatreboy

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Lumenari

How would you feel if you were molested years ago and not believed when you finally decided to come forward about it ?

How would you feel if you did nothing and were accused of molestation?

What's your point, should we dismiss all allegations of sexual assault on women ?

I guess if you are Bill or Hillary Clinton, just publicly assassinate the proclaimed victims’ character. So, I guess so.

She’s a registered Democrat,
She is a far left liberal clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University that is a known ultra liberal brainwashing college in calif.
she gave money to the DNC and the Bernie Sanders campaign.

Signed a Letter Demanding an End to Trump’s Family Separations at the Border and it was used as an exhibit in an ACLU lawsuit against the Trump administration.
And is a political activist.

Brett Kavanaugh’s Mother, a Judge, Presided Over a Foreclose Case Involving Christine Blasey Ford’s Parents.

Is a member of Physicians for Human Rights and wants open borders.

This is a far left desperation hit job plain and simple.

The democrats hope they will control the senate after the elections an are trying desperately to delay the vote on Kavanaugh.

She had the opportunity to speak up about this when It was alleged to have Happen. but did not.

seriously, how can anyone take this accusation at anywhere near face value? especially when this has become the new political tactic used to remove political opponents (especially by leftists). it was not long ago up in Canada where the leading candidate to lead the Province was likewise accused of sexual misconduct, at a critical point getting close to the election date. there was not just one accuser, but two accusers involved. the fallout from this piece of crap me too movement[i] was bad enough that there was no way for the guy to even defend his innocence. and in the end was forced to step down as leader of his party. which left the party scrambling to get a new leader, and really did not have enough time to work on a platform. would anyone be surprised that at the time the accusations were laid, that the Liberal party (Canada's version of the mainstream democrats) was polling so bad that it was felt that they would be virtually wiped out, with the accused's party winning by a landslide? after everything was said and done it was PROVEN that not only did the accusers lie, but they were friends. in other words it was just a political setup, just like this case. it seems the left does not care at all about integraty, just winning by any means possible.

the fact is these type of aligations made when the timing makes for some sort of value, especially political gain. should be by LAW, not allowed to be publicised at all. and anyone who does publish trash like this hit with automatic libel charges (which should be criminal charges for those involved, and prison time). and have apsolutely prohibbited from entering into things such as appointment hearings. much like a jury is prohibited from considering testimony that is hearsay in their deliberations. in order4 for something like this to be considered, it should first have to go through a propper and full investigation, and a trial where the accused is found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

if this lady feels she has a legitimate claim. then i would invite her to take it to the proper authorities like the police, so a proper and thorough investigation can be done. and IF there is found to be enough hard evidence of a crime taking place, then taking it to a proper court of law to deal with.