It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Xtrozero
do workers who get piece work often work more efficiently??
in the trades it's typically always usually a yes, that directly leads to more money through more effort therefor providing performance incentive's = higher production
most HR department know this as well as most CEO's and board members which is why managers are often given performance incentive's
originally posted by: toysforadults
actually hunter gatherer's had the most leisure time, look it up
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Xtrozero
do workers who get piece work often work more efficiently??
in the trades it's typically always usually a yes, that directly leads to more money through more effort therefor providing performance incentive's = higher production
most HR department know this as well as most CEO's and board members which is why managers are often given performance incentive's
I understand what you are saying, but companies use many other things as motivators than money. In the end money is the most short lived motivator out there and so the worst one to rely on.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: SR1TX
I pay great $ for high quality work, and my team is very motivated to make more based on the enjoyment having $, a tool, brings.
Money is a great motivator. Try not having it sometime.
Give them 5 bucks an hour pay raise and see if they work harder...lol More pay just becomes the new norm and so production will drop back to what it was before.
You still need to pay for skill and the value the position brings you, so yes you could be paying big $$ for a person's skills, BUT they better be bringing profit to offset that pay or you will not be in business very long.
originally posted by: highvein
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: highvein
Forced work through suffering. Crack that whip massa.
Better than paying for them to be lazy. I would not pay someone to not do a job would you? If so send me some money and I will not do the job you want done.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Xtrozero
another myth, look into how they calculate those numbers and why they are misunderstood
myth busting day apparently
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: highvein
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: highvein
Forced work through suffering. Crack that whip massa.
Better than paying for them to be lazy. I would not pay someone to not do a job would you? If so send me some money and I will not do the job you want done.
You do realize that many industries are subsidized by your tax dollars specifically to NOT do something, right?
Corporate welfare eclipses social welfare by a magnitude of 1,000 to 1.
originally posted by: highvein
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: highvein
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: highvein
Forced work through suffering. Crack that whip massa.
Better than paying for them to be lazy. I would not pay someone to not do a job would you? If so send me some money and I will not do the job you want done.
You do realize that many industries are subsidized by your tax dollars specifically to NOT do something, right?
Corporate welfare eclipses social welfare by a magnitude of 1,000 to 1.
Did you read the part were I said to cut welfare? Don't just cut the welfare for people who can work but don't, cut it for the companies also.
originally posted by: SR1TX
In other words. You are confusing job description with $ earned. You find the right people for X job and pay X rate based on X factors, but adding more fuel to a gas fire, does not increase the efficiency of the fire. You are just making it burn longer.