It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: verschickter
originally posted by: turbonium1
You are the one who is talking in absolutes, by saying software can be 'smart' or 'intelligent'.
This is a joke right?
originally posted by: verschickter
a reply to: charlyv
Try to see it this way:
There are really no thoughts "out of the blue". For your consciousness, it is out of the blue, while your subconsciousness was working on it for a while. You (as in the conscious part) just didn´t notice that until that thought surfaced.
originally posted by: verschickter
a reply to: charlyv
Try to see it this way:
There are really no thoughts "out of the blue". For your consciousness, it is out of the blue, while your subconsciousness was working on it for a while. You (as in the conscious part) just didn´t notice that until that thought surfaced.
originally posted by: LedermanStudio
originally posted by: verschickter
So, thank you for all of the effort you have added to this post.
I realize that what I wrote was NOT in keeping with the actual reality of current AI development.
Also, I did get to read a bit more since the OP. ...not that a whole 24 hours has made me any more expert
Let me ask this:
The early stages of AI development seem to preclude that my thesis from the OP can really be a part of the later stages?
To oversimplify... early AI development is so fundamentally black and white that any hypoyhetical future evolution is 'innoculated' from the kind of influence I postulated?
thanks!
A human needs intelligence to sort mail
originally posted by: Byrd
Smart AI is most likely to look (in the end) like the Starship Enterprise -- and only after a long time will it react like Commander Data (to use examples you might be familiar with.)
originally posted by: LedermanStudio
originally posted by: verschickter
So, thank you for all of the effort you have added to this post.
I realize that what I wrote was NOT in keeping with the actual reality of current AI development.
Also, I did get to read a bit more since the OP. ...not that a whole 24 hours has made me any more expert
Let me ask this:
The early stages of AI development seem to preclude that my thesis from the OP can really be a part of the later stages?
To oversimplify... early AI development is so fundamentally black and white that any hypoyhetical future evolution is 'innoculated' from the kind of influence I postulated?
thanks!
originally posted by: verschickter
There are really no thoughts "out of the blue". For your consciousness, it is out of the blue, while your subconsciousness was working on it for a while. You (as in the conscious part) just didn´t notice that until that thought surfaced.
originally posted by: verschickter
a reply to: Blue Shift
English is not my first language, how many languages do you speak 100% perfectly?
originally posted by: dude1
a reply to: turbonium1
So animal are not intelligent ?
What about all the people who never build any machine ?
A human needs intelligence to sort mail
So human can't sort mail the way a machine sort mail ?
You use the capability of intelligence to create the capability of sorting mail.
Even if the capability you create for the machine to sort mail is different from the capability of sorting mail for the human , its just another capability.
Maybe to talk you have to building robots that talk like humans , maybe not. Its what they can do that matters. The capability.
We are NOT there yet. (but that wasn't your point).
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: verschickter
a reply to: Blue Shift
English is not my first language, how many languages do you speak 100% perfectly?
I'm not talking about your use of the language, which is fine, but are people still using such old concepts as "subconscious" and "conscious" to describe supposed structures of intelligence?
The point being that here we are on the verge of creating machine intelligence, and possibly even sentience, and we don't really even have a good understanding of how our own minds work.