One person conveniently not named as possible source of the op-ed

Have everyone it could be voluntarily submit to polygraph testing and questioning, see who shows up and passes. Fire anyone that doesn't!

I'm tired of the constant scandal and drama coming out of DC. I feel like I'm being dragged through a reality show.

I HATE REALITY SHOWS!

How was the thing made up? Typed out? Made on a printer? If it's done on a printer, those cute little spots on the paper would point to whose printer it came from. Then we can have chapter 2 of "As the Toupee Turns".

Other "un-named" possibilities are the DNC.

The NYTimes and the DNC have worked "together" before during election years.

They have also failed many times just like now.

💥😎💥

a reply to: xuenchen

The book, the "insider", the timing, the political expedience all indicate a politically motivated plot by trump haters and/or his opposition.

Desperation fueled by the failed efforts to destroy Trump and end his presidency before the midterms?

originally posted by: ausername
Have everyone it could be voluntarily submit to polygraph testing and questioning, see who shows up and passes. Fire anyone that doesn't!

Is that you don?

How is it hangin?

a reply to: howtonhawky

Yes, it's me I am Don.

But I'm not a Trump.

John Podesta posted this interesting tweet. Like an Arsonists hanging around an orphanage fire...

twitter.com...
a reply to: Kharron

If the goal was civil unrest in order for the NWO to save the day, Obama would have gone too jail. After all the penchant for violence is on the left. Far more likely to cause the chaos the strategy you are theorizing to be effective.

It was McCain. It was safe to print it now...

We have all been suckers...yes , including me
The NYT is failing
They shed most of the editors and a lot of the journalist staff in an attempt to save money and make ends meet
The NYT have picked up the anti-Trump wave in a vain attempt to increase their revenue

With few editors left that would turn down a good story (true or not) in the name of money , and knowing the source may never be found....
They did it

That would be my guess

Wait until Trump reveals that he has a deep cover insider at the NY times who will, when the time is right, reveal the author's name.....

I'm not going to profess to understand all the legalities of this.
I'm not going to speculate on who is responsible.

All I know is this constant drip feed of one controversy after another associated with Trump and his administration only serves to discredit the US, its political system and most importantly its people......and that is criminal.

Trump just seems to attract and even actively court controversy.

Sadly, at the end of the day its only the US and its people who will suffer....I don't think that's in the worlds best interest.

Honest question here if someone could please explain... why is this co-ed is a big deal exactly? As long as it stays anonymous it is just a fantasy story with no evidence to back up anything in it really. Why is President Trump is furious about this co-ed? Its clear purpose is to weaken this presidency, create even more trust issues within, which is happening just as it was intended to...

a reply to: Kharron

The author has been identified as a senior white house employee . Not anyone who used to work there. Someone who works there now. The Times knows who it is.

a reply to: burntheships

Mark Felt denied being Deep Throat for decades before he decided to out himself.
I would not believe any denials at the moment.

I think its Dan Coats.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

a senior white house employee. Not ex employee.

a reply to: Metallicus

criticizing the president is not a crime. I know that trump wishes it were.

a reply to: Spiramirabilis

pretty sure its someone with NAS experience.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

no its not. Its a senior white house associate currently employed.
The New York times does not publish fiction.
No matter what the liar in chief says about them.

a reply to: 14377

We knew before the election.