One person conveniently not named as possible source of the op-ed

Trump has been fuming for the second day and has instructed his aides to identify the leaker, news agencies report. Senior officials had to personally rebuke the letter and distance themselves. This all points to the fact that the White House is indeed treating this as a leak and believes that the letter may have come from inside the White House. Mike Pompeo entered his today.

There has also been a lot of conjecture and listing of potential suspects, by various news agencies, but I have noticed one name always conveniently left off the lists. I also created a thread last night pointing that this may be one of his own attorneys in a new defense strategy, but I did not consider one of his past attorneys until in bed last night -- a former attorney with very well known and questionable ties:

Wilbur L. Ross -- Head of the Department of Commerce and a Rothschild attorney.

To follow this down the rabbit hole, one has to be aware of the Trump-Rothschild connection spanning decades, and also be aware that during Trump's first bankruptcy the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers assigned Wilbur Ross to DJT as his personal bankruptcy attorney.

This was done by Baron Edmond de Rothschild at the time, although Wilbur Ross later continued working for his brother, Jacob Rothschild. After decades of working together and being friends, Ross offered his support to Trump in 2016 and was given a coveted position in commerce.

Now, we have heard, or rather read, many times the theories that Trump may unwittingly be an agent of the Rothschilds, carrying out their agendas. It has also been theorized, and I have written about this as well, that in furthering the goals of the New World Order, chaos and unrest must happen before the NWO is presented as a peaceful solution.

I have personally posted that I believed that as the Rothschild family groomed him and brought him up into the world of politics, they will also destroy him, and for multiple reasons. The first being civil unrest following the fall of a divisive president, and the second to send a message to the other wealthy that the upper echelons of the super elites don't have any openings -- to enjoy one's wealth and stay put.

What if Wilbur Ross, who may still be an agent of Jacob Rothschild even though he took a position in the government, is carrying out that work? What if the next phase of the plan is in effect?

It would indeed be the Deep State that is doing this, as people are saying, only it is the very same Deep State that made him and installed him as president in the first place. He has sown the division necessary and prepared the country for unrest and civil disobedience, paving the way for the next puppet to continue the hidden agendas.

Could this be the work of the Rothschilds? Wilbur L. Ross?

a reply to: Kharron

He already issued a statement denying he wrote it.

"I did not write and am thoroughly appalled by this op-ed. I couldn't be prouder of our work at Commerce and of @POTUS." — tweet by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.

www.nytimes.com...

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Kharron

He already issued a statement denying he wrote it.

"I did not write and am thoroughly appalled by this op-ed. I couldn't be prouder of our work at Commerce and of @POTUS." — tweet by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.

www.nytimes.com...

I did not see that yet, thanks for posting it.

Should we believe that "these aren't the droids you're looking for" statement?

I say never trust a Rothschild -- anything is possible.

a reply to: Kharron

I think Rex Tillerson could be a wild card. I know he's out, but that gives him nothing to lose. He still knows a good amount of the cabinet and how they function.

We should take an ATS poll and put up prizes.

My money is still on Mike "lodestar" Pence. Of course he denied being the author, what did you expect?

www.bbc.com...

a reply to: burntheships

Politicians say "I did not" quite a bit .

originally posted by: olaru12
We should take an ATS poll and put up prizes.

My money is still on Mike "lodestar" Pence. Of course he denied being the author, what did you expect?

www.bbc.com...

Well, every single person will deny it, of course. But one of those that denied t actually did it.

If it isn't illegal to leak that information to the press then what difference does it make? The Deep State has been spying on Trump since day one. It isn't surprising they have a mole (or troll) positioned inside the Administration.

Do YOU believe the information leaked was illegal? If not, why care?

I don't know about Wilbur Ross and that op-ed... But I think you are spot on about the Trump Rothschild connection, and the PTB building him up to be another puppet POTUS, only to systematically take him down

originally posted by: Metallicus
If it isn't illegal to leak that information to the press then what difference does it make? The Deep State has been spying on Trump since day one. It isn't surprising they have a mole (or troll) positioned inside the Administration.

Do YOU believe the information leaked was illegal? If not, why care?

I don't think any part of it is illegal but it is insubordination, and could result in a termination.

However, the letter is very destructive to the President and I am saying that could be a plan that was put into effect long before now.

originally posted by: Metallicus
If it isn't illegal to leak that information to the press then what difference does it make? The Deep State has been spying on Trump since day one. It isn't surprising they have a mole (or troll) positioned inside the Administration.

Do YOU believe the information leaked was illegal? If not, why care?

So you were cool with how Obama handled leaks?

Were you in an uproar he had them?

originally posted by: Kharron

originally posted by: Metallicus
If it isn't illegal to leak that information to the press then what difference does it make? The Deep State has been spying on Trump since day one. It isn't surprising they have a mole (or troll) positioned inside the Administration.

Do YOU believe the information leaked was illegal? If not, why care?

I don't think any part of it is illegal but it is insubordination, and could result in a termination.

However, the letter is very destructive to the President and I am saying that could be a plan that was put into effect long before now.

So are we talking "Zionism" again? We all know the Rothschild's history.

a reply to: olaru12

Madeleine Westerhout


I don't know if she's high enough up to get the NYT to give her the space - but she has all the access

ETA: She's old school conservative - a Romney supporter: Pro McCain, anti Putin

Perhaps it was trump?

Maybe he is involved in some type of fight club scenario?

After all he is the current lodestar.

a reply to: Kharron

Personally, I don't think it came from anyone within the White House. It's a work of fiction penned by a pathetic "journalist" and slapped with a clandestine "insiders say" style authorship to grant it credibility from the gullible of the world.

I don't understand the bus on the subject. It's just the Liberals recirculating old claims. We all heard this already in 2017.

On Monday night on CNN, Carl Bernstein made this proclamation: "The president and his presidency is in chaos."

It's a remarkable statement given that we are only 11 days into the presidency of Donald Trump. It's also very hard to dispute.

Consider this amazing — and I do mean amazing — WaPo story today about how Trump and his inner circle produced the very controversial executive order instituting a travel ban on refugees and all visitors from seven predominantly Muslim countries. The story details the infighting and blame game among Trump's top advisers and includes some eye-popping lines.

Among them:

* "Defense Secretary James Mattis and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly fumed privately to associates over the weekend because they had been caught unaware by a travel ban that was drafted and set into action largely in secret by the White House, according to three people who have spoken with them."

www.google.com... inute-of-it/

a reply to: Gargoyle91

The NY Times also likes to claim "Senior Administration Officials" a lot when they actually meant to say "first year intern".

My money is on make me relevant so my book sells more than one copy Omarosa Manginault Newman. It will eventually come out, the Times has an ethical decision to make, regular reporters are dutifully attempting to uncover who while the op-ed department has promised not to divulge. Do they print it or do they not ?

a reply to: 14377

Ding! Ding! Ding!

We've heard all of this since Day 1... for some reason, the left is doubling down and has taken the "anonymous sources say" to the next level with "Written directly by an anonymous insider" that supposedly cuts out the middle man "journalist" from the equation... It's BS.

originally posted by: Kharron
Should we believe that "these aren't the droids you're looking for" statement?

There is an equal chance this is Hillary Clinton channeling John McCain.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Kharron

Personally, I don't think it came from anyone within the White House. It's a work of fiction penned by a pathetic "journalist" and slapped with a clandestine "insiders say" style authorship to grant it credibility from the gullible of the world.

Have we ruled out the Russians yet?