It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well, shutting down the free press, and rounding up the journalists is on Page One of the 'Overthrowing Governments for Dummies' isn't it?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: one4all
in fact privately owned MSM should be OUTLAWED...it is brainwashing on a massive scale.
...If you wish to defend freedom of speech then you need to immediately begin lobbying to have all privately owned MSM entities disbanded neutered and dissolved......lol...not defend them...LMAO...that is so yesterday....lol.
So you want there to be only state-ran media outlets available to the people, in which only the state-approved messages are released to the public?
That sounds like... North Korea.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I'm ignorant because we've been tricked about anonymous sources in the past? The msm can write any smear article about anything and protect themselves by stating they don't know the source or wanna protect them. I refuse to be a sheep
Really? You seem like a typical Trump sheep to me.
I'm sorry I wanna remain skeptical because obviously people are begging to take down the president and the NYTs has been a joke for a long time.
Yes I know the cult is strong in you and you refuse to consider possibilities outside of the cult bubble. It's easy to dismiss out of ignorance to remain ignorant. True skeptics challenge their thinking and are willing to be proven wrong and recognize that fact. Fake ones just hide behind a veneer of skepticism so they don't ever have to challenge their thinking.
If a crimes been committed present evidence
Lol crimes? There was no mention of crimes in that op-ed. Seriously. Go read the article before you respond any further!
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Well, shutting down the free press, and rounding up the journalists is on Page One of the 'Overthrowing Governments for Dummies' isn't it?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: one4all
in fact privately owned MSM should be OUTLAWED...it is brainwashing on a massive scale.
...If you wish to defend freedom of speech then you need to immediately begin lobbying to have all privately owned MSM entities disbanded neutered and dissolved......lol...not defend them...LMAO...that is so yesterday....lol.
So you want there to be only state-ran media outlets available to the people, in which only the state-approved messages are released to the public?
That sounds like... North Korea.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Swills
The New York Times’ scathing anti-Donald Trump op-ed, which the paper attributed to “a senior official in the Trump administration,” has inspired a parlor game among people trying to figure out the author’s name.
Some online commentators are leaning toward Vice President Mike Pence based on just one word in the piece.
The unidentified author singles out the late Arizona Sen. John McCain as “a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue.”
One Word Has People Convinced Mike Pence Wrote Anonymous New York Times Op-Ed
A new conspiracy has come out that Pence might the anonymous writer of that NYT resistance article and the only evidence is based off of one word, lodestar. An odd word, one I've never used or ever heard used, ever. This word can be found in the NYT resistance article that everyone is up in arms about for the moment and Pence does have a history of using it.
Is he the one? The evidence is very circumstantial but who the hell uses that word, especially amongst Trump's administration?
I dont think the "source" would be dumb enough to use anything that would identify them that easily.
Which is why I think this is a setup by Trump himself to take out the NYT. He hates Carlos Slim, who is majority owner of NYT.
They never say they met with this source. It is likely they only had electronic comms but asked for definitive proof the "source" was close to POTUS. Who better to provide that proof than POTUS himself?
Voila....NYT completely discredited for falling for a fake story and running it with completely made up "facts".
Certain phrases and words are planted in order to keep people guessing at who it is.
Could even be cover for the later announcement of the investigation opened on Rosenstein that was let out tonight.
So...either the source is never identified and Trump drops the push for that, or Trump comes out and says he did it...
CONSPIRACY!!!!
Still feeling that this is Trump and his team doing this solely to shake it up and get the libs in a frenzy.
There is nothing of real substance in the letter, but it WILL get MSM to spend outrageous amounts of time and resources to dig and keep them out of real goings on.
I hope it comes out that it was done at Trumps direction just for a great "egg in the face" moment, but I don't think they will do that.
It appears to me that Trump is playing the MSM at their own game....and playing it well.
originally posted by: Rob420
a reply to: Muninn
Right trump need the weak minded Evangelical voters who vote for who ever the money hungry tbn pastor's tell them two and pence is a big fajr Christian so that is why pence is VP.come on now the man represents aback water Indiana he had no other chance to advance unless he took the vp spot
originally posted by: olaru12
If the oped piece was designed to throw the WH into paranoid chaos, it's working.
It's not 4 D chess, it's total pandemonium and turmoil and the leaks coming out of the WH have turned into a flood of information. Stay tuned....
Operation Lodestar is gaining momentum....
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: olaru12
If the oped piece was designed to throw the WH into paranoid chaos, it's working.
It's not 4 D chess, it's total pandemonium and turmoil and the leaks coming out of the WH have turned into a flood of information. Stay tuned....
Operation Lodestar is gaining momentum....
All this is going to do is lead to lie detector test ona random basis,just like Obama did.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Gothmog
Says the guy whose camp is filled with Russian bots all over the net supporting Trump and causing much discourse with their campaign of trolling.
But I will agree Clinton did have her own bots but shes not relevant anymore while Trump clearly is and the Russian bots haven't stopped.