TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -e11even-

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Everything that gets discusssed on the boards here happens outside it!

originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: Skyfloating

Honestly, one has to question their motive? What don’t these organizations want out in the open? This can’t be just about votes.

Votes are just one form of currency for POWER and CORRUPTION.

💥☣💥

@ dashen - ATS thread "ZERQ" was my creation.

Better recognize.


...so we don't go in CIRCLES.

Incoming missle, in 3... 2... 1...

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Media Matters, ACLU and CBS employees posing as extremist Q posters helped bring reddit sub down

The CBS employee has been identified by top Reddit moderators as Gary Phillips, who serves as digital media administrator for CBS Studios International in Los Angeles.

More than 30 covert left-wing actors have been identified coordinating with Phillips, including activists linked to Media Matters and the ACLU.

You can sure anti-Q and fake pro-Qsters are present across all platforms. Its THAT important to them.

"All for a LARP" - Q

Great post everyone should read Neon Revolts take.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Everything that gets discusssed on the boards here happens outside it!

Key word "Promote".

a reply to: IAMTAT

I think it's worth mulling over the "between the lines" implications of 50,000 texts between Strzok and Lisa Page.

An earlier poster suggested this equates to over 16 hours a week?

If I had a middle manager consistently spending a third of their working week texting someone in the legal department then I would be closely monitoring the situation; reviewing it with the individual on a monthly basis at least. As it was on a work phone I would probably ask for analysis of the texts from the tech department.

If there was not a NEED for that communication channel to continue at that rate, because of an objective I'd given the individual, then I would direct the individual to stop or limit texting to outside working hours.

Questions:
1) Was there a work objective related reason for Strzok and Page to spend 16hours a week for a year communicating by text?
2) Were Bill Priestap and Andy McCabe aware of this level of texting? Did they sanction it?
3) Equally was Lisa Page's line management (who?) aware and did they sanction it?
4) Assuming both line managers sanctioned or even asked for this communication channel to be used (text), why? What audit trail is NOT kept on texts that IS kept on email?
5) Are we aware of any normal workload that would require Strzok and Page to work together for 33% of their working time?
6) Consider that managers at their level would normally be spending 15% of their time on management of underlings, 10% on admin and workload reporting to their bosses. So they are spending more of their time texting than on these 2 activities. This also only leaves 42% of their working week to "do the day job" and fulfil their assigned objectives.
7) What is the time analysis of the texts? What percentage were 9 to 5pm and how many were outside normal working hours?

originally posted by: surfer_soul
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

I believe blocking ads is against the T&C's of the site. The 3 Amigos need to make money too. A small inconvenience for having this great place.

originally posted by: surfer_soul
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

The kind of promotion I speak of is: We can discuss the Republican party, but we can not promote it. We can discuss Democracy, but don't support it. We can discuss Satanism, but not promote it. We can not enlist efforts to form gangs to overthrow any ideology or government. We can not promote any internet based communications platform over another, as much as we would like to. We do not promote "Alien" agendas, if if they exist.

We can discuss all of it, for educational proposes only. Nor, in reality, can we promote, Q.
We discuss, we do not organize, or promote.

The internet? The course will be set, by its owners! And who they are, is to be determined.

The "Owners" of this site do have the right to profit from their efforts, same as anyone else. As long as they are based in a country that is a republic, governed by law.

a reply to: pavil

How is Neon Revolt seen as a trusting person when all they do is shill for "q" Merchandise...

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Discussing ideas is a form of promoting or demoting them.

The internet? The course will be set, by its owners! And who they are, is to be determined.

Interesting, the internet consists of a bunch of hardware in the form of servers on the one hand and on the other is pure information. Who gets to own and control that information? The owners of the servers, the service providers? The government? The creators of said information?

It’s worth considering as it’s very pertinent to the times.

a reply to: queenofswords

Ha ha.
You see what you want to see.

a reply to: Skyfloating

No she wont. Maybe in dumb conspiracy theory books. This crowd knows nothing about her except the made up crap of conspiracy.
This crowd is blinded to reality and wont ever know anything about her.
I'm sure she doesn't care.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Case in point...

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Media Matters, ACLU and CBS employees posing as extremist Q posters helped bring reddit sub down

The CBS employee has been identified by top Reddit moderators as Gary Phillips, who serves as digital media administrator for CBS Studios International in Los Angeles.

More than 30 covert left-wing actors have been identified coordinating with Phillips, including activists linked to Media Matters and the ACLU.

You can sure anti-Q and fake pro-Qsters are present across all platforms. Its THAT important to them.

"All for a LARP" - Q

The "Agents Provocateurs" idea is correct I see !!!!

Classic.

💥Busted🎃Exposed💥