Trump - Impeach me and the market crashes

a reply to: DreamerOracle

He was right to take away Brennan's security clearance if that's what you mean by taking away toys.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: St Udio

He has a whole other passel of legal problems facing him once he's a private citizen again.





Nine ways to Sunday...

No one will care then. They only care about getting him out. That's what this is all about. He's interrupting their radical communist agenda.

a reply to: JBurns

I think what we've seen in South Africa is a preview of what they'd try (but fail) to accomplish here as well.

What did you see while you were in South Africa? Where did you stay? Who did you talk to? Or are you referring to the fiction that Fox News fed to Trump to make him loom worse to our allies?

a reply to: Skywatcher2011

If this happened and market crashed...u would see California and San Fran become the first third world economies in the US

Trump carried all the third world states in the US, remember?

a reply to: Cassi3l

It's a statement of fact. Nothing more, nothing less. If you know anything about the current market, you know he's right.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Cassi3l

They wouldn't crash, but they sure as hell wouldn't be happy.

Not to say they revolve around him, but rather stability and certainty.

Correct. Trump actually gets ousted and you better buckle up.

I say this as a full fledged believer in equity capital markets - they don’t like uncertainty - and it will at minimum be very volatile. Capex probably declines as well.

All of the stormy Daniels stuff, his offputing remarks etc. are just noise. Removal of a sitting, pro-business, anti-regulation president would legit rattle the business environment and the capital markets.

There's a hysterical Eric Cartman laugh for s# this deaf, dumb & blind from leaders of countries. I just don't feel like digging it up, use your imagination, South Park fans.

If the market wobbles, it's liable to happen from pearl-clutching investors anyway. All they need is an excuse to pearl-clutch.

Other investors would have a buying field day. That spike alone would immensely outweigh ANY losses, they'd be recovered extremely quickly.

Hell, if they crapped themselves hard enough, hubs would absolutely expand his portfolio. By A LOT. It would be a windfall all around for those that didn't panic like hysterical women.

a reply to: Xtrozero

And I say again, Obama did not make statements based on his own ego, which would have had potential effects on the markets. Trump has.

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Yeah that's what he's doing.

a reply to: Dfairlite

Hes's full of himself. That is to say...He's full of shlt.









.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Trump called out the US Federal Reserve policy of raising interest rates to attract investors to government debt.
Historically as ROI from debt yields rise above stock dividend values the stock market prices decline.
So Trump looking ahead and seeing that his presidential legacy may be choreographed with a planned recession hurts his ego.
Fair enough, but when the Obamas purchased a house in the US before the housing price balloon burst they paid too much.
That hurt the Obama ego enough that they were one of the first to sue for a mortgage modification.
If you recall it was all those bad loan write offs that created extra debt for quantitative easing in the first place.

a reply to: EnigmaChaser

All of the stormy Daniels stuff, his offputing remarks etc. are just noise. Removal of a sitting, pro-business, anti-regulation president would legit rattle the business environment and the capital markets.

Replacing an anti-free trade, unpredictable, alliance shattering moron with a colorless, predictable pro-business conservative would be bad for business how?

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
But of course that wasn't a crash or anything 🙄

You're right, it wasn't.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Xtrozero

And I say again, Obama did not make statements based on his own ego, which would have had potential effects on the markets. Trump has.

You know, it's funny Brit, you seem to be very left leaning, I'm somewhere in the middle, and there are lots of right leaning people on ATS...at one point or another I have disagreed with you, with Right leaning folk, but it always seemed that logic was the tool by which to make our statements...if you're keeping logic in your toolbox these days to argue, it's a losing battle for all of us regretfully.

I just cant wrap my head around the sheer dogma that drives the inane commentary.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Xtrozero

And I say again, Obama did not make statements based on his own ego, which would have had potential effects on the markets. Trump has.

You know, it's funny Brit, you seem to be very left leaning, I'm somewhere in the middle, and there are lots of right leaning people on ATS...at one point or another I have disagreed with you, with Right leaning folk, but it always seemed that logic was the tool by which to make our statements...if you're keeping logic in your toolbox these days to argue, it's a losing battle for all of us regretfully.

I just cant wrap my head around the sheer dogma that drives the inane commentary.

I vote logic and reasoning.

I really try to stay in that "arena".

It's good not to be the only one.

a reply to: Sillyolme

That is indeed what he is doing.

There are elements within your party who support the new-apartheid regime in South Africa, supports South American socialists, flirted with Fidel Castro and vociferously seeks to install a socialist government in the US that mimics those failed states

A socialist government is illegal in this country

Article IV Section IV US Constitution

originally posted by: TrueBrit


And I say again, Obama did not make statements based on his own ego, which would have had potential effects on the markets. Trump has.

Just answer me one question...If any President was impeached would that affect the market? You are trying to debate some kind of level of narcissism here and that is like trying to debate what pile of crap smells worst...lol

a reply to: JBurns

A socialist government is illegal in this country

Article IV Section IV US Constitution

Here is Article IV. Please highlight the part that says the government cannot provide its citizens with services:

ARTICLE IV
SECTION 1
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

SECTION 2
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.

SECTION 3
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

SECTION 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

A strict interpretation of the Constitution permits the establishment of a socialist economy, provided that its political structure is republican in nature.

a reply to: Cassi3l

Assassinate the orange bawbag through and watch the markets do the opposite i imagine.

Come on America restore the rest of the worlds faith in your nation and top that foolish Muppet sharpish.

You may even avert the third world war by doing so.

a reply to: Cassi3l

"Really, Trump think the markets revolve around him
I guess the Sun must do to ..."

That's not a Suntan he has, that's fake Tan. LoL