It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: St Udio
Trump is not concerned with hubris about himself... his aim is for his group of neocons to come out-on-top verses the Radical-Revolutionary- Left (Demofascists) that has been controlled by the (bankster-petro) Globalists from Bush W thru Clinton & Obama to now...
I am sure that the GDP economy/ Stock Markets/ Debt Balloon will take a severe hit whether Trump gets Impeached or not... the economic reset is in the cards already
If Trump gets removed from office the Fed & Central Bankers will have to rescue the USA from total anarchy & collapse... they will install (with Congress approval) -> Wage & Price Controls... so that money is rationed out to the masses and costs-of-living can be controlled instead of the Trump way of using the Tax system to act as the governor of the economy...
the leftists will get their envisioned communist/socialist state with the masses getting enough largesse' to Sustain Themselves for the next 10 years...but no limit on the Democrat Party Elites, Czars abilities to accumulate wealth which the huddled masses have suddenly lost. Of greater concern will be the victory over the Trump Cabal will lead back to Wars-For-Profit as a means to an "no-end-in-sight" conflict paradigm---- Whereas the Trump policy was to negotiate instead
negotiate everything...like the Russia pipeline of nat gas Germany... the Syrian nat gas exporting infrastructure to EU...
the development of the Israeli Trillions of cubic feet of gas energy which lies somewhat under Gaza & the Golan Heights and under the Med. almost to Cyprus (.but stingy hands do not want to share any bounty)
our future may be better under a Trump led NWO instead of the present banker-energy Globalist NWO that has screwed things up since JFK's end
had to gloss over stuff to keep the post under a 2 minute read
originally posted by: DieGloke
Better argument would be:
Impeach me and you get Mike Pense!
The thought of that wackadoodle bible thumper being President would make me think twice of impeaching trump even if he shot a baby live on air and released a Putin gay sex tape.
originally posted by: Ash614
a reply to: introvert
It ended at 350 points because the news was corrected. If they had not retracted the story it would have crashed imo.
Examples of these circuit breakers are:
Nevertheless, market-wide U.S. circuit breakers were instituted in 1988. After producing increasingly frequent trading pauses over the next decade, as the size of the market grew, the breakers went mad in 1997, triggering constantly and causing a full shutdown on October 27th. This caused a bout of recriminations and some significant tweaks to the system, notably a shift to percentage-based thresholds. Since 1997, market-wide breakers have been triggered precisely … never. No market event since 1998—including the worst declines of the Great Recession and the “flash crash” of May, 2010, when the value of many major stocks briefly plummeted in value—has triggered a system-wide stoppage.
the S&P 500 breakers have three thresholds: at seven per cent, thirteen per cent, and a total shutdown in the event of a whopping twenty-per-cent decline.
originally posted by: [post=23702336]Ash614[/pos]
The market was baked in for Clinton victory.
originally posted by: Enderdog
True! Other people go broke, because the game is rigged to punish "common sense". Wacky reality we live in, eh?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
Its one thing for him to think such a thing, which would be pretty pathetic in and of itself, but quite another to voice it. Who, exactly, does he think he is? Even the President of the United States, regardless of who it happens to be in a given year, cannot seriously expect to not be a laughing stock even amongst his supporters in the know, after such a statement.
originally posted by: JBurns
You don't think the markets would react (possibly strongly) to political instability?