It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: BlueJacket
ok.
thats great and all
it would still be nice to have sick time.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: rollanotheronestay happily married and work for a great company.
You've got this all figured out! Why didn't anyone else think of that?
originally posted by: ClovenSky
Dang now I have consider I don't have it too bad. The company I currently work for pays out a week of sick time every year with accumulations up to 170 hours. I was getting upset that if you are a responsible person who shows up for work, after 170 hours are accumulated, you are losing the money.
I guess I should be grateful to even get the time. But then again, is our wage being suppressed due to this benefit? If a company figures this into their total compensation, I would take it on the front end and just get paid more. It is like those annual statements sent out that shows what you actually 'cost' the company. It is usually 2-3x's your salary with all of the benefits. When I asked if I could take responsibility for my life decisions and trade some of those benefits for more take home pay, they just laughed at me. If they send out the statement of what it costs to keep me employed, why should they care as to how it is distributed?
That would be funny to claim a contractor status, they should be able to pay that total sum including benefits without batting an eye, it would be less paperwork for them. But that would give up the lie in startling fashion.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: CB328
My feet hurt sometimes at work.
I think my employer should be forced to give me foot massages.
And don't skimp on the cheap lotions! I want Tea Tree Oils dammit!
originally posted by: DieGloke
I have worked in a place that happens and it sucked for the few of us and the manager that did not get sick.
Would of been better for the department if that sick employee had stayed home!
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: DieGloke
I have worked in a place that happens and it sucked for the few of us and the manager that did not get sick.
Would of been better for the department if that sick employee had stayed home!
We encourage people to stay home if sick. We also give about 25 days a year of sick/vacation time too. We allow people to carry over 200 hours each year too.
originally posted by: DieGloke
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: DieGloke
I have worked in a place that happens and it sucked for the few of us and the manager that did not get sick.
Would of been better for the department if that sick employee had stayed home!
We encourage people to stay home if sick. We also give about 25 days a year of sick/vacation time too. We allow people to carry over 200 hours each year too.
Sounds like a sensible company.
End of the day it's about productivity.
originally posted by: CB328
that’s $92,500.00 dollars
Yes but you're already paying it. In reality that cost would be how much work didn't get done from someone being sick for a day. Assuming the other workers pick up some of the slack, like in my job, then you're not paying nearly that much.
originally posted by: Nickn3
originally posted by: CB328
that’s $92,500.00 dollars
Yes but you're already paying it. In reality that cost would be how much work didn't get done from someone being sick for a day. Assuming the other workers pick up some of the slack, like in my job, then you're not paying nearly that much.
Your math doesn’t work. I would be paying one to be off and another to do the job.
originally posted by: Nickn3
I am torn on sick leave. I would love to have it, but.
I have about 65 employees right now, I run a construction company. I have no doubt most of the guys would take a day to go fishing and we would have an epidemic the opening day of deer season. The next thing is who would pay for it? Say the employees is accruing 1/2 a day a month. That six a a year times 65 = 370 sick days. At $250 bucks a pop on average, that’s $92,500.00 dollars. Quite a hit to the bottom line. My benefit package is currently about $6.75 per hour. For educational expense, insurance, vacation, 401K, holiday pay, clothing allotment, ect.
If you were one of my Customers would you mind another modest increase on your invoice to pay for my employees sick days?
originally posted by: Nickn3
I am torn on sick leave. I would love to have it, but.
I have about 65 employees right now, I run a construction company. I have no doubt most of the guys would take a day to go fishing and we would have an epidemic the opening day of deer season. The next thing is who would pay for it? Say the employees is accruing 1/2 a day a month. That six a a year times 65 = 370 sick days. At $250 bucks a pop on average, that’s $92,500.00 dollars. Quite a hit to the bottom line. My benefit package is currently about $6.75 per hour. For educational expense, insurance, vacation, 401K, holiday pay, clothing allotment, ect.
If you were one of my Customers would you mind another modest increase on your invoice to pay for my employees sick days?
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: DieGloke
a lot of smaller companies just can't afford it plain and simple
this will allow larger companies to dominate markets that pass this legislation and create a new barrier of entry to smaller guys wanting to be a little successful
the small business climate in this country is already almost nearly impossible rather than probable we need to move in the opposite direction