President Trump Issues a Blunt Assessment of our U.S. Department of Justice.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Justoneman

Who cares about money I want to know what votes were altered?

Trump cares about money. That's the point. Votes were altered in the minds of the voters. Think about that. You are defending one of the most spectacular brainwashings since the fall of the Third Reich.

Dead voters voted that was likely DNC. Vote recounts had to be halted in Michigan where HRC got more votes than voters on the rolls. Way more votes taken than voters and that ended the Michigan recount.

Source, please.

So no votes were changed then. A persons mind isnt a legitimate place to claim voter fraud,because its constantly changing.

Thread-related illustration, from today's firing of Peter Strzok.

To illustrate the DEPTH of deep-state corruption within the FBI, the FBI Internal I.G. suggested that Strzok be demoted one notch and suspended 60 days. That's all.

Congressman Ron DeSantis just said that 7 people including McCabe strzok Comey Lynch Hilary have been referred to the justice department for criminal prosecution.

The department of Justice's response was to tell DeSantis that Congress is annoying.

I assume those criminal referrals were then flushed down the toilet.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Justoneman

They cheated in the General and in the Primary. They can't really win without cheating it appears to me.

And Trump couldn't win without Russian money and propaganda. Deal with it.

Self proclaimed delusions? Damn, but hey, deal with it lefty 😁

originally posted by: carewemust
Thread-related illustration, from today's firing of Peter Strzok.

To illustrate the DEPTH of deep-state corruption within the FBI, the FBI Internal I.G. suggested that Strzok be demoted one notch and suspended 60 days. That's all.

So then it seems President Trumps assessment is right.

a reply to: carewemust

Lisa Page has testified to Congress under oath in closed door hearings.

Her testimony regarding corruption was key in getting Peter Strzok FIRED.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

a reply to: M5xaz

Lisa Page has testified to Congress under oath in closed door hearings.

Her testimony regarding corruption was key in getting Peter Strzok FIRED.

No, Trump's threat to fire Rosenstein was. Pure politics.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: M5xaz

Lisa Page has testified to Congress under oath in closed door hearings.

Her testimony regarding corruption was key in getting Peter Strzok FIRED.

No, Trump's threat to fire Rosenstein was. Pure politics.

ZERO to do with Rosenstein.
Source for your, ah,"fictional theory " ? Let me guess: NONE

Some of the source(s) for my statement:
-During a June congressional hearing, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray said that Strzok had been referred to the Office of Professional Responsibility — which he called the bureau’s “independent disciplinary arm” — and that officials would “not hesitate to hold people strictly accountable.” Wray promised that the process would be “done by the book.”
www.washingtonpost.com... 689_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.8c0aa7f68fa5

-FBI insiders said Page, his former lover, was “instrumental in getting him terminated.”
truepundit.com...

www.cnn.com...



LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL (part DEUX)

a reply to: M5xaz

Her testimony regarding corruption was key in getting Peter Strzok FIRED.

Do you have a source for this claim?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

Her testimony regarding corruption was key in getting Peter Strzok FIRED.

Do you have a source for this claim?

Not the sole source but a coffin nail in the Strzok firing and there is no doubt about it.

a reply to: Justoneman


I have doubt. Who knows what she said behind closed doors? Not you and not me.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

Her testimony regarding corruption was key in getting Peter Strzok FIRED.

Do you have a source for this claim?

Several.
Posted one above. Here it is again:
-FBI insiders said Page, his former lover, was “instrumental in getting him terminated.”
truepundit.com...

a reply to: M5xaz


So nothing, then. Nobody knows what she testified to. Just a bunch of stereotypical assumptions that she's a scorned woman on the warpath.

a reply to: M5xaz

ZERO to do with Rosenstein.
Source for your, ah,"fictional theory " ? Let me guess: NONE

Here's why I think that:

Privately, Mr. Rosenstein has developed a gallows humor about his relationship with the president, joking to friends that he wakes up not knowing if he still has a job—even while telling them more seriously that he is unconcerned about his job security.

Not the "liberal media."

Some of the source(s) for my statement:
-During a June congressional hearing, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray said that Strzok had been referred to the Office of Professional Responsibility — which he called the bureau’s “independent disciplinary arm” — and that officials would “not hesitate to hold people strictly accountable.” Wray promised that the process would be “done by the book.”

He was not fired by the OPR:

Aitan Goelman, Strzok’s attorney, said FBI Deputy Director David L. Bowdich ordered the firing Friday, even though the director of the FBI office that usually handles employee discipline had decided that Strzok, 48, should face only a demotion and a 60-day suspension. Goelman said the move undercuts the FBI’s repeated assurances that Strzok would be afforded the normal disciplinary process.

“This isn’t the normal process in any way more than name,” Goelman said, adding in a statement, “This decision should be deeply troubling to all Americans.”

Your own source.

Bowditch was not acting on his own initiative. Either Wray, or his boss, Rosenstein, or his boss, Sessions, ordered the firing because of threats from Trump. Political pressure rolls downhill. Trump fired Strzok because his widdle ego was huwt.

a reply to: DJW001

Your quote
""Privately, Mr. Rosenstein has developed a gallows humor about his relationship with the president, joking to friends that he wakes up not knowing if he still has a job—even while telling them more seriously that he is unconcerned about his job security."

The above in no way supports your fictional theory regarding Rosenstein and the Stzrok firing.
Try again.

"Either Wray, or his boss, Rosenstein, or his boss, Sessions, ordered the firing because of threats from Trump. Political pressure rolls downhill. Trump fired Strzok because his widdle ego was huwt."

Again, pure 100% unsourced, and false, drivel.
Stzrok was fired for cause.

Period.

With respect to hurt egos, the left was wrong regarding the election.
Wrong.
Period.
Deal with it.

It's way past time the left start accepting the results of the election.

..and , no, 60 MILLION Americans were not magically "Brainwashed" into voting for Trump by the Russians, the Chinese, Aliens or some other demented explanation.

Hillary's own acts were more than enough to ensure she lost.

originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: DJW001

..and , no, 60 MILLION Americans were not magically "Brainwashed" into voting for Trump by the Russians, the Chinese, Aliens or some other demented explanation.

Anyone who believes that 60 million were brainwashed, has mental issues.

a reply to: carewemust

Federal Judge orders the arrest and jailing of a man who offered to pay a $5,000 bounty to anyone who would bring him some of Hillary Clinton's hair.

nymag.com...

In the meantime, Democrats in Congress and Hollywood call for all manner of violence against President Trump, and Republicans in general. Yet they don't even receive a slap on the wrist, from ANY authority!

SOMETHING IS TERRIBLY WRONG IN OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

a reply to: carewemust

If anything provokes a revolt it will be the FBI and DOJ. They are criminal.