Buzz Aldrin admits they did not go to moon?

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

The pictures are fun, aren't they?

Looking at them, and remembering what I saw on that huge B&W console TV in 1969, is fun.

What's not so fun, is then realizing that it's almost 50 years since that day--and we've not been back...that's truly sad.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

The pictures are fun, aren't they?

Looking at them, and remembering what I saw on that huge B&W console TV in 1969, is fun.

What's not so fun, is then realizing that it's almost 50 years since that day--and we've not been back...that's truly sad.

I sometimes wonder if we have been back, maybe even multiple times, but it's a secret for the in-crowd.

originally posted by: angeldoll

I sometimes wonder if we have been back, maybe even multiple times, but it's a secret for the in-crowd.

Given what we now know about the Lolita Express, that's really quite possible, if there are children on the moon.

I would say we didn't go back, but that it was NASA on the grassy knoll.

a reply to: carewemust

On any night one can lay on their back with the moon in view... and "set foot on it".

Perspective.

One side costs A lot.

a reply to: angeldoll

Anything is possible, I suppose...

But how the heck do you hide it? Where? The signature of the launching of the rocket necessary to reach the moon, is, to say the least, impressive, not to mention visible for hundreds, if not thousands of miles.

The communications necessary--so tight that radio receivers all over the globe haven't caught any of it? Or amateur astronomers/photographers all over the world haven't caught on to regular passage between the earth and the moon?

The launch facilities themselves will cover vast acreage.

It's easy to postulate hidden space programs, less easy to actually hide it.

a reply to: Masterjaden

it amuses me no end - to read posts like this :

you utterly ignore the " geopolitical fallout " of a hoax attempt being unnmasked

why is thaat ?

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: angeldoll

Anything is possible, I suppose...

But how the heck do you hide it? Where? The signature of the launching of the rocket necessary to reach the moon, is, to say the least, impressive, not to mention visible for hundreds, if not thousands of miles.

The communications necessary--so tight that radio receivers all over the globe haven't caught any of it? Or amateur astronomers/photographers all over the world haven't caught on to regular passage between the earth and the moon?

The launch facilities themselves will cover vast acreage.

It's easy to postulate hidden space programs, less easy to actually hide it.

COUGH* huge black triangle lifters that dont require rockets*cough*

a reply to: Masterjaden

Locking the crew in a cupboard would have made it impossible for them to make live TV broadcasts that featured Earth, in colour, complete with astronauts appearing on camera and describing what they can see, and where Earth featured a hurricane only looking the way it did on the day of the broadcast.

Here's my copy own of an image from such a broadcast, dated, as it appeared in the next day's newspapers.

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo

If you start at 3.00minutes you will see how they took that image.

And don't you wonder why the movie of the moon landing was in really bad black and white..............yet they had a colour video of inside the space ship.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

The maker of that video lied.

The camera was hand held and the broadcast was no secret - stills from the many broadcasts they made en route to the moon appeared in newspapers, books and magazines. What you see is the view of a full Earth that could only have been made on the day of the broadcasts thanks to the meteorological fingerprint made by the clouds. Hurricane Bernice is a particular giveaway - there is no way they could have predicted what it would have looked like or where it would have been in time for the broadcast.

They did indeed have colour TV in the CSM. They had a different camera on the surface - one that was developed for low light conditions

www.hq.nasa.gov...

I've looked in detail at every single image of Earth taken, filmed and broadcast and checked the weather satellite records and they are an perfect match - here's the part covering the outbound section of Apollo 11

onebigmonkey.com...

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo


They did indeed have colour TV in the CSM. They had a different camera on the surface - one that was developed for low light conditions

Was there low light conditions on the light side of the moon?

a reply to: CosmicAwakening

It must be true, youtubes already disbled the vid.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

For the TV cameras at the time, yes.

Ever seen a TV crew doing a broadcast in daylight on Earth and still using lights?

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: Itisnowagain

For the TV cameras at the time, yes.

Ever seen a TV crew doing a broadcast in daylight on Earth and still using lights?

Was it dark on the light side of the moon?
I would have thought it would be too light not low light on the moons surface -I would not think they would need any artificial light to film on the moon.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

They landed in early lunar morning. The moon reflects a lot less light than Earth does. TV cameras at the time required a lot of light.

Read the pdf I linked to. Use Google.

The fact is that the video you provided does not explain how the image I showed was take because the maker of the video lied about how he got the footage and deliberately misrepresents what is in it. The Earth shown in it could only have been filmed in cislunar space on the day of the live broadcasts

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

People from NASA say that we have not as yet left earths low orbit.
Go to the 3 min mark to see NASA Astronauts say that we can only fly in earth orbit at present.

Do you disbelieve the astronauts in the video?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

They are specifically talking about the Orion spacecraft which is still in development. The mission profiles of that craft require it to go through parts of the VAB that were not traversed during Apollo as it took a different tracectory. Nowhere does he say that people have never been beyond Earth orbit. You can't film an entire Earth view from Low Earth Orbit.

This is just turning into Moon Hoax bingo.

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: Itisnowagain
You can't film an entire Earth view from Low Earth Orbit.

I know!!
The famous blue marble is made from many different images pieced together.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

No, it is not.

www.flickr.com...

The first photos of Earth in that magazine are from LEO, then after TLI. Only once you get beyond a certain distance is it possible to get the entire Earth in a single shot, which they do many times over numerous observations.

Here's some 16mm they took just after TLI - not all the EArth visible in one shot. The blue marble shot was taken about an hour later.

apollo17.org...:50:31

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

I have clicked your 2nd link but I cannot see any pictures of the earth in the link - is in on the video?
I see the images of earth in the 1st link though. Thanks.