It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

page: 31
141
<< 28  29  30    32  33  34 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


POTUS TWEET no longer seems to be avail on twitter.com but from archive:


I'm Landing Shortly...

Found using Trump tWitter Archive


WJIBOR


WJ-William Jefferson [Clinton] (Doesn't make sense, but first thing to come to mind)

IBOR-Internet Bill of Rights


OSTHCR


OS-Operating Ssytem
THCR-No idea Could be THC Communications, Stock Ticker (THCR). It looks like a dead Penny stock.
Company Profile Here


QKTHCR


QK-Q Kill
THCR-The OS


KSSHKA


K SSH-Key Secure Shell
KA-Kill Access

edit on 15-7-2018 by CoramDeo because: More, more.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: TomLawless

Thanks for that I think he's got it bang on!!

What I want to know is who is behind his media strategy, even more so than who is Q (of course I want to know that too)

Whoever it is they are fricken brilliant!!

Imagine creating this much buzz and support...for free!!!
edit on 15 by tiredoflooking because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:08 PM
link   
Water is calm in Helsinki.




posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

If it's true, we've been on the right track all along. Makes me look at the bitter invective thrown around here somewhat differently. There is now definitely no need to engage them.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:18 PM
link   



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:22 PM
link   
Finland




posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:23 PM
link   
a reply to: TomLawless




There is now definitely no need to engage them.

^That... right there.^



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: TomLawless

I think there's not much question!

Some version of this idea is true.

Will we ever have Q vindicated? Maybe, maybe not.

The strategy to engage people the way Q has is beyond brilliant.

I somehow doubt they will stop or abandon this bunch, to do so would be counterproductive.

Can they keep this going running up to 2020?

Or was /is the goal just midterms...

Seems like plausable deniability serves a purpose.

That had me questioning Q talking about asking DJT at this point. Maybe it was just to ramp up buzz.

It's entertaining and exciting no matter what.

I'm enjoying the show!



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:29 PM
link   
More signs of big trouble for NXVIM.

frankreport.com...



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:31 PM
link   
a reply to: CoramDeo

Thanks Coram, a great improvement on my suggestions.

WJ DOES make sense, when you see a decode I am about to post for #195 which references DJ for POTUS and GW for George W Bush!



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:34 PM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Me too. I was teetering a couple of weeks ago, but not anymore.

I think this goes way beyond mid terms. Trump's got more than one October Surprise in the works.

He's holding his cards.

I disagree with Rex on one point: I think we will definitely find out who's been talking to us. I still cling to the "Hope" that a certain pretty lady is part of the team (possibly two).



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:34 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

We have to stop. There is no point.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: TomLawless
More signs of big trouble for NXVIM.

frankreport.com...


This is a perfect description of what is going on at every level. Just take out the names and replace them with any of the names we know. It describes perfectly the ground up system in place for this entire process and why it takes a bit of time and a whole lot of patience, skill and silence.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Yeah, and the Swamp is BIG. Much bigger than NXVIM.




edit on 15-7-2018 by TomLawless because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: TomLawless

I get far too happy reading those reports!

Yes NXIVM child trafficking torturers, they have it ALL.

A perspective from the other side of the fence.

Imagine you are a person who fears an upcoming indictment all these months...

Reading along with Q.

Brilliant strategy whoever you are.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:51 PM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Allison Mack did horrible things. Nothing I can link or mention here. Word is getting out.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

I disagree.

Debate keeps us on our toes.

Weeds out the disinfo.

Also important for new eyes on the threads.

This isn't a cult.

We don't follow blindly.

Now that being said purposeful derailment attempts are different.

Also fighting with the same point over and over.

So bring it skeptics!

You will have to up your game.

We can bring it too, if we are defending truth?

ALL DAY LONG. 😘



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:54 PM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Skeptics are fine. Harping and derailing needs to be ignored.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Allison Mack did horrible things. Nothing I can link or mention here. Word is getting out.



She couldn't be the VP of a very powerful SRA cult without having getting her "hands dirty". Believe that.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: crankyoldman


As was alluded to by me, but flushed out by our more astute colleaque SS, P and S are FBI in name only (and maybe paycheck). She is his handler, and his rather satanic personality makes for a perfect ping pong agent. They've lost protection, but who's?


I'm gonna go with Iran/Clowns, Cranky.
Obama left 'em out in the cold to take fire.
Hillary was supposed to take over their care and feeding.

I wonder how "loyal" Obama's top people will be to him when they're put under oath to testify?

About what?


His Satanism, for starters.




This photo has been debunked by Ante, this whole start to this thread has fallen apart


Can you provide a cite for that? Thanks.



new topics

top topics



 
141
<< 28  29  30    32  33  34 >>

log in

join